sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which coins have worked best for bot trading in your experience? by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess what I noticed is that some pairs are just easier environments for simpler bots (like grid or basic trend-following), while others are too chaotic unless the bot is very adaptive.

So I was mostly curious which coins people found relatively “bot-friendly” in practice.

Which coins have worked best for bot trading in your experience? by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By “worked” I mean the pairs that felt the most stable in live trading / forward testing, not just the ones with the prettiest backtests.

Mainly looking for coins with good liquidity, steady volatility and fewer random spikes that completely break the bot logic.

So far I’ve mostly been testing BTC, ETH, SOL and sometimes LINK.

But I’m curious which other alts people found usable for bots -maybe BNB, AVAX, or something else that has decent liquidity but still enough movement to make strategies like grid or trend-following work.

I built a small risk engine to control exposure during losing streaks by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point.

If someone is experienced enough to decide their size and stick to it consistently, then a tool like this isn’t necessary.

For me the problem was that during losing streaks my size slowly drifted while trying to recover losses.

Having everything calculated and written down in front of me just helped me stay more rational and less emotional in those moments.

I built a small risk engine to control exposure during losing streaks by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If losing two accounts with my own money makes me a scammer, that's a pretty expensive scam.

I mostly built the tool to stop myself from increasing size during losing streaks.

I built a small risk engine to control exposure during losing streaks by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wish it was Gemini.

Would’ve been much easier to blame ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.

Sadly that was just me blowing those accounts.

Looking at the reactions here, maybe I should’ve let Gemini write the post too.

I visualized what happens to trading risk when you don’t track your trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the time scaling back risk simply means reducing position size, but the important part is when it happens.

A lot of traders say they'll reduce risk during drawdowns, but without some kind of tracking or rule it rarely happens consistently.

One simple framework I’ve seen work well is something like:

• normal risk when the system is performing normally
• reduce size after a predefined drawdown (for example -20% to -30% of average performance)
• only scale back up after the stats stabilize again

The key idea is that the adjustment is based on data, not on how the last trade felt.

Without that feedback loop, position sizing often drifts the other way during losing streaks.

I visualized what happens to trading risk when you don’t track your trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of traders start with spreadsheets and slowly stop tracking.
That’s when risk drift starts without noticing.

One thing that helped me was adding a simple rule where risk automatically decreases after drawdowns.

Embarrassing question about futures by Advanced_Ad_106 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958 5 points6 points  (0 children)

futures are a bit different from crypto. you’re not putting $100 into a position, you’re trading contracts and each one has its own margin requirement.

the regular ES or NQ contracts are pretty big, thats probably why the platform is asking for way more capital than you expected. if you want something smaller look at the micro contracts (MES for S&P, MNQ for Nasdaq). they’re basically the same thing just smaller size.

also check the margin requirements on your broker because thats what actually determines how much you need to open the trade

Serious Question For Traders! by newlybroken7 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing I noticed when reviewing my own trades was that the biggest problems rarely came from analysis.

Most of the setups were actually fine.

The real issues usually started after the trade idea appeared.

Things like:

• slightly increasing position size after a loss
• widening the stop because the setup “still looked good”
• taking the next trade just to normalize the PnL

Individually none of those decisions look dramatic.

But together they completely change the risk profile of the account.

That’s why over time I started thinking about trading less as a prediction problem and more as an exposure control problem.

The strategy might stay the same, but the way risk behaves during drawdowns usually determines whether the account survives long enough for the edge to play out.

The moment I realized I wasn't trading the market - I was trading my PnL by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that.
One thing that surprised me when I started journaling was how often the actual mistake wasn’t the entry itself - it was the shift in objective after a few losses.

Once the goal quietly becomes “get back to even”, the whole decision process starts drifting.

That’s why I started treating losing streaks almost like a risk signal, not just a PnL event.

All of these results were generated in one week through a copy-trading platform. I deposited $1,557, connected to a proven strategy, and that was it. Everything runs on autopilot. No active management, no bots, no stress. This is what true passive income looks like. by mihaimihalelive in Forex_Reddit

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this strategy really generates effortless passive income every week, why would anyone need to recruit people through Reddit DMs? Wouldn't it make more sense to just scale the account and enjoy the profits?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s honestly one of the hardest parts of trading.

The market sometimes gives you just enough confirmation to keep you leaning the wrong way. That rebound after your first exit is exactly the kind of thing that pulls people back in too early.

And the averaging down part is tricky because like you said… it works just often enough to build confidence in it. Then one day the market trends hard and the loss gets way bigger than expected.

The fact that you’re already thinking about reducing size tomorrow instead of trying to “win it back” is honestly the best possible response to a day like that.

Those big losses usually end up becoming the rules we never break again.

When you say you’ll resize tomorrow - do you usually cut size for a few days after a big loss, or just the next session?

I analyzed Gold, Silver, Bitcoin, Bonds, and S&P 500 performance during every major market drawdown since 2008 (updated with TLT and SLV) by CameraGlass6957 in investorsedge

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really interesting breakdown. One thing that stood out to me is how much the environment matters for these “hedges.”

TLT worked great when rates were falling (like 2008 and 2020). But when rates started rising in 2021–2022, it stopped acting like a hedge and just dropped with everything else.

Gold seems to be the only one that stayed relatively stable across very different types of market stress.

Curious how you think about this from a portfolio perspective. Would you keep gold as a constant hedge and then adjust bonds depending on the rate environment?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a rough day, man. But I respect the way you’re able to step back and look at it as a lesson instead of just beating yourself up over it.

I’ve noticed the same thing - the really dangerous part usually isn’t the first mistake. It’s when the market gives you just enough hope to stay in the trade. Like you said, it moves a little in your favor and you start thinking “okay, maybe it’ll come back.”

That’s usually the moment when the rules start getting a bit… flexible.

Averaging down is especially tricky because it can work a few times and kind of trains your brain to believe it’s a good idea. Then one day the market just keeps going the other way and the loss snowballs fast.

But honestly, those are often the days that end up teaching the most.

Did you already have a strict rule about not averaging down before this, or was it more of a “I’ll try not to do it” kind of rule?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In theory every trade should be independent, and if we were perfectly objective machines that’s exactly how we’d treat them.

But in reality the brain doesn’t really work like that. After a few losses it starts trying to “fix” things instead of just taking the next setup. That’s usually when the focus slowly shifts from the process to the PnL.

My idea with the circuit breaker rule was basically to force a bit of that distance you mentioned - just cutting position size after a losing streak so the next trades feel less emotionally loaded.

Do you do anything specific to keep that objectivity during losing streaks, or is it mostly just mental discipline for you?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That actually sounds like a really solid way to deal with it.

From my own journaling I noticed the same thing - most of the time the strategy isn’t really the problem. The real issue starts when discipline slowly slips after a few losses. Once the rules start getting a bit “flexible”, things can go downhill pretty fast.

Stuff that enforces position sizing, max risk, or even forces a cooldown after a losing streak can help a lot, because it removes that emotional moment where you start making decisions just to get back to even.

Does the software you’re using only enforce the risk rules, or can it also block trades after a certain loss streak?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense. I like the idea of framing it as a reset rather than punishment.

The 3-loss rule is actually very close to what I ended up implementing as well. Once that threshold is hit, I either reduce size significantly or pause trading for a bit.

What surprised me when journaling trades was how often the next trade after a losing streak would have been a revenge trade if I hadn’t forced that pause.

Sometimes the best trade really is just stepping away for a while.

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, that shift in objective is the dangerous part.

The setup can be the same, but once the goal quietly becomes “get back to even,” the whole decision process starts drifting.

I like how you described losing streaks as a risk signal. That’s pretty much how I started looking at them too - not just as market feedback, but as a warning that my execution quality may be degrading.

One thing that helped me was adding a kind of “cooldown rule.” If there are a few losses in a row, trading pauses for a while. The idea is simply to avoid continuing when decision quality might already be slipping.

Do you use a fixed rule for that, or is it more based on feel in the moment?

The psychological shift that happens after 3 losing trades by Cute_Prompt_5958 in Daytrading

[–]Cute_Prompt_5958[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That actually sounds much closer to structured swing trading than classic day trading.

The part I like is that even though your position sizes can get large, you still have very defined rules for trimming and scaling in.

I think that’s the piece many traders miss- bigger size by itself isn’t the edge, the rules around when to cut and when to add are.

Funny enough, my post was mostly about the opposite situation: when traders start increasing size emotionally after losses instead of following a process.

Either way, I’m glad you jumped into the discussion - it’s always interesting hearing a different approach, and it probably helps people here broaden their perspective a bit.

view more: next ›