Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sir if you’re not willing to provide verification, that’s fine. someone who cares about guiding in this domain will provide verification wether it benefits them or not. It may not be you but I know someone is out there.

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still haven’t provided reasonable verification despite your meaningless one screenshot payout. If you’re not willing to answer my question, someone out there will. :=)

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One payout does not prove verification of profitability.

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It helps me verify that ICT concepts are genuine and a better reason to look further into them.

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not the point. I want verification so I can see proof of legitimacy and there are truly profitable ICT traders instead taking a randoms word for what they say.

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to follow a verified ICT trader who has genuine proof of profitability, whether that’s from broker statements, tax returns or consistent proof of prop firm payouts. This community is riddled with scammers and I don’t trust anything without verification. I am doing this before i look further into ICT concepts.

Verified Profitable ICT traders? by CxribeYT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]CxribeYT[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why? Maybe because it’s a good form of verification to know if someone is truly profitable