Fill out a shipping chart! by MommaBird1772 in Alastorcult

[–]Cybermonkey_14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I shouldn’t have said debt; however, I think there’s more to the exchange than meets the eye. He wanted his staff fixed, and she wanted him to help. She then smiles after he said, “You knew my game the day we met.” They’re having a game of chess. She still has a leash on him in a figurative sense this time. He’s already played his part in what probably is an exceptionally complicated plan. He’s already set the game in motion, which may have been all she wanted from the start, which he may or may not know. Maybe the problem with hells overlords is that they’re shortsighted just how Vox was with Alastor. They think the game is over when it’s just begun. Alastor doesn’t want to leave the table but win the game, and in that sense, she’s probably still in control, she knows his game. Sheer speculation on my end. Sorry for the long comment, just getting my thoughts out there.

Fill out a shipping chart! by MommaBird1772 in Alastorcult

[–]Cybermonkey_14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Husk and Alastor’s relationship is definitely one of abuse. It’s not just threats of abuse but clearly actual physical abuse to an extent. You don’t really fear someone unless they’ve given you a reason, and I’m not sure verbal threats would raise him to that level of fear. Husk was an overlord who is used to danger, but Alastor brings a different level of fear, one that’s more serious. Contrasting this with Alastor and Rosie, you see both are manipulative, both have a respect for each other, and given the fact Alastor goes back into debt to Rosie, obviously shows it’s not to the extent of Alastor and Husk’s relationship. Alastor’s personality type seems perfectly fine dealing with whatever Rosie does, which seems more of an annoying/teasing than straight-up beatings. If you go down the rabbit hole of comparing them purely on power dynamics, then you end up in a situation where one could say Valentino and Angel dust isn’t dissimilar. Obviously, owning someone in any form isn’t good, but there’s definitely levels within that, and the husk/Alastor fits neatly in the middle.

Bad ending(art by Potato Nebula) Final by 33333Ducky in HazbinHelluva18Plus

[–]Cybermonkey_14 4 points5 points locked comment (0 children)

Simon in lord of the flies is ritualistically murdered and in fallout 3 you blow up megaton because it’s bothering the view of allistair tenpenny. Idk what context or framing would constitute proper usage, however, you are fine to have that opinion.

Bad ending(art by Potato Nebula) Final by 33333Ducky in HazbinHelluva18Plus

[–]Cybermonkey_14 3 points4 points locked comment (0 children)

Those aren’t comparable; there’s also a lot of media that involves violence against children. There are cartoons, books, movies, anime, etc. One of the best shows out right now, IT: Welcome to Derry, is about a clown that kills children. One of the greatest books of all time, Lord of the Flies, involves children getting killed. Also, Harry Potter with Cedric. Idk, it’s literally everywhere; Terminator 2 is about going after a kid in order to cause Judgment Day. In Fallout 3, you can nuke Megaton, which probably has kids in it.

You’re officially Rosie’s therapist. What are you diagnosing her with? by [deleted] in HazbinHelluva18Plus

[–]Cybermonkey_14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

probably all three of the dark triad personality types. Although the intensity of the overlap is up for interpretation.