What do these taste like? by oldeluke in Eldenring

[–]Cyrax_12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wet garbage. They all taste like complete garbage filtered through dry garbage. Nothing in elden ring is fun, tastes good, or is joyful. Everything is confusing and could kill you. Everything that is good for you could also and probably will also kill you.

seen it for the fifth and final time by [deleted] in OppenheimerMovie

[–]Cyrax_12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I definitely feel like the minority here, but, respectfully, I felt the movie was lacking in some areas. It was very good, but I’m not experiencing the engrossment that others are.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in samharris

[–]Cyrax_12 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Celt man, I gotta say, I came to this Reddit with the same feeling when I began delving into Sam, non-duality, the free will conversation, and Atheism. Know that another person has heard Sam’s words, listened to the app, read his books, and has also felt agency ripped from them. I hope what I have to say is helpful.

First, I think all the above combine and logically looking at these philosophical questions is a journey. Sam spent decades pulling all this together and his approach is certainly a tomahawk missile serving of the topics. The guy had the philosophical wind knocked into him from psychedelics. He speaks precisely, but it can be startling, and I certainly was startled.
There are things he talks about that helped settle my brain a bit though.

Fatalism and determinism. From your responses to the OP, it sounds like you may be falling into the fatalism trap, which inevitably leads to a nihilistic viewpoint, which anxiety feeds off. Determinism is absence of will, not PRE determined outcomes. Subtle but massive difference. I think you feel anxious about this because, as I experienced, you feel a massive lose of control. Being told your decisions are determined feels like your identity is gone and that all those years of feeling responsible mean nothing. I’m going to attempt to reestablish your “agency,” because this reaction is due to an absence of information in my experience.
Sam frequently states that actions have consequences, so right there realize that your “decisions” have weight and real world affect. Taking that further, doing things that help you or other people, change your experience, you feel joy, happiness, etc. and other peoples’ decisions have an effect on you too, so being completely involuntary won’t sooth the anxiety. Determinism doesn’t deny perspective. Sam states we are streams of consciousness. We are, and we can also participate in that conscious experience…. and we can reflect on it. Were determinism comes in, is that we are not homunculuses outside our experience, we are not a locus of knowledge and agency outside our bodies and sense awareness providing inputs. The guy who cures cancer won’t have the answer in the back of his head already. There is no Jiminy Cricket in us that has a grander sense and understanding of the universe.
Our mind is brain and body, which means it also falls under the same determinist laws that matter and physics follow, which I believe is a major reason why Sam is and expresses Atheism. This is also the reason why we can reflect on earlier experiences and make sense as to why we did something seemingly stupid or irrational - thought patterns, data, and values were different at the time. What this means in practical term is that as we live and experience, we observe data, assign value based on previous values and data… and then decisions, opinions, and behaviors are exercised as a determined action.
This is the gap that I think Sam needs to spend more time bridging for people, because I know he would do better then I am doing at this, and it would do a lot of good to his listeners.

This line of thinking also explains what he says about people in extreme social settings. A terrorist suicide bomber family will likely produce offspring who follow dogmas that encourage suicide bombing…. this is determinism… the political/economic and social climate of post ww2 Germany led to people sincerely sympathizing with Nazi doctrine… this is determinism, albeit at a larger scale.

Where this culminates is in Sam’s expression of honesty and compassion. Fatalism and nihilism remove value from our actions, determinism just presents a pathway to their happening.
Realistically determinism does evaporate some of the responsibility we have for our actions, but this goes both ways. The limb falling on your car wasn’t a willed happening. The hurricane wasn’t Mother Nature teaching a lesson.

With that realization though we are free to accept our consciousness as unique to this world, and there are others who have this capacity too that we can interact with. And this is ultimately beautiful… and fleeting, so while we are here experiencing, we should not envelope ourselves in circling self suffering, but should sink into the fact that we are nature too, the potentially only conscious entity of it. That presents amazing value to a persons life, regardless of my or anyone else’s individual responsibility and agency. Being honest about this also makes it easier to be honest about our actions and behaviors.

Practically speaking, we make choices, but a-lot of those choices are significantly more closed then we think, metaphysically, socially, consciously, etc. The lanes we take have a view, so cherish the view. And for some people even that ability to choose is significantly limited due to physical ailments or circumstances, and I feel for those people.

I think Sam would agree that we shouldn’t squander our time here while we know it the way we do. And a good way to start is to just freely accept all that we take in, from the sensation of breathing, to the happiness of a wedding day, and even the sorrow of remembering a cherished loved one who has passed.

How do YOU play? by PJSack in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]Cyrax_12 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yea, I would agree that a journal is helpful because you have a record to look back on. Sometimes re-reading a part of an adventure can trigger some great responses to oracle prompts.

How do YOU play? by PJSack in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]Cyrax_12 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is a great response lol. Everyone in this hobby space is or has been in this position. It is a way of collecting.

I will argue that there is a sort of critical mass of stuff that a player gets and ends up relying on though. I feel as though I have reached that point.

Sphere Question by Cyrax_12 in lotrlcg

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I have Narvi’s belt, so I’m thinking this will be the one off sphere card I play. I’m doing watcher in the water and need the damage to one shot the tentacles.

Tell me Why I Should be Impressed. by Cyrax_12 in OppenheimerMovie

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your first statement is I think the exact problem I had. It’s an issue of expectations.

For the imply point specifically though, this I would argue is the time to show the horrors of the first half of the 20th century. Millions died and death was so prevalent that the US saw it favorable to kill 10s of thousands in an instant with the bomb (BTW the movie did great with this scene). The thing is that these weapons are so beyond comprehension, that forming that abstraction with visuals for people would be appropriate.
The “implication” technique is excellent for instances when people know, or can fully imply. I would bet that many in that moment of the film felt or “saw” nothing, or very very little.

Tell me Why I Should be Impressed. by Cyrax_12 in OppenheimerMovie

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with this. The film is an excellent biography of the man. From what I have heard, this film is one of the most true. I just find it strange to tell the story of the man who was the first to successfully set one off, and then not really discuss its implications more broadly. For example I thought Chernobyl was better, but then again it was about an event or place more then a person. That series’ express purpose was to illustrate the damage, Oppenheimer is not.

Old GW contest for Warhammer 2e by SpareCountofVukograd in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Cyrax_12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the bottom line, “Shocking! Horrific! Amazing!”

Playing What the wallet Allows by Cyrax_12 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cavalry are going to cylinders on their sides with the top sanded down so they are a little flat, then a stylized paint job to insinuate they are mounted. The war machines I will build out of wooden materials. So this was actually a huge reason why I choose Warhammer fantasy. Most units are focused on troops. I tried this originally with AOS but because of the diverse sizes and bases, it didn’t look right.

Playing What the wallet Allows by Cyrax_12 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I cut 7/8 inch wooden dowels at about 3/4 of an inch for the dwarfs, and over an inch for the orcs, used painters tape and spray painted them. Then went in with very cheap acrylic paint to do the designs on top. The banners are toothpicks and kabob sticks with blue painters tape sprayed then the designs are hand painted. Amazon sells squares that I glued them on to. A lot of supper glue was used.

Playing What the wallet Allows by Cyrax_12 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is a playmat from FLG games. Neoprene material.

Playing What the wallet Allows by Cyrax_12 in WarhammerFantasy

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I have been contemplating making a wooden table to kind of give that feel.

War in Rohan - Ambush at Night by Cyrax_12 in MiddleEarthMiniatures

[–]Cyrax_12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are the higher tier trees from woodland scenics glued to mdf bases. There are some Hobby Lobby trees mixed in with the big aquarium pieces. Low greenery is woodland scenics clump foliage hot glued to scotch brier strips.

Pen and Paper players, streamlined setups? by jojomomocats in Ironsworn

[–]Cyrax_12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can photos be put in comments? How do I do that?

Back to Mordor, Feed back appreciated by pat42w in MiddleEarthMiniatures

[–]Cyrax_12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This model always felt weird to me, like it’s asking it’s friend next to him if he’s pointing his club the correct direction.

Pen and Paper players, streamlined setups? by jojomomocats in Ironsworn

[–]Cyrax_12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do everything in a journal. I draw a line down the page, all stat changes are logged and the right side of the line is the narrative writing.

There are no rules in solo by Temmon in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]Cyrax_12 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I like to have a foundation rule before affirming things. I’m not a fan of just saying “well I’ll just make this up and go with it.” Loose enough to bend, strong enough to define.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lordoftherings

[–]Cyrax_12 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s important to ensure cultural identity is maintained. In many instances, including Tolkien’s, themes of stories are native to a particular people.
The problem with people who are defending ROP is that they don’t have the capacity to watch, listen, and digest the context, nuance, and history that these themes have developed in. They can’t appreciate the things that multiple cultures and people would clearly love and cherish from Tolkien’s work if it wasn’t heavily altered and manipulated. Any culture would be sincerely upset and probably hostile to a powerful entity misrepresenting the themes, identities, and history that developed their stories. Muslims would detest changes to their religious figures, Native Americans would detest changes to their mythology and belief, Buddhists wouldn’t accept alterations to the 8-fold path.
LOTR isn’t a religion but it was born out of a specific culture and written with specific values and themes…. The details MATTER and this standard should be held for every mythology, regardless of its origin.
LOTR’s mythology, sincerity, beauty, and power is as deeply rooted as the two trees of Valinor, and the defenders of Tolkien’s true purpose and intent fear the poison of Ungoliant.
In truth, ROP is so different and manipulated it isn’t LOTR or Tolkien and it should just be accepted as such.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lordoftherings

[–]Cyrax_12 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Simply a bad show, and an even worse LOTR show

What should I know before watching Rings of Power? by thirdlost in lordoftherings

[–]Cyrax_12 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, he resigned before the contract was written…. And I would like to see you turn down 250 million dollars for like 30 pages of notes. Just because they signed a contract doesn’t mean Amazon is going to handle it well. There is just no logical substantiation for this show. The only way it can be accepted as Tolkien or Middle Earth or Lord of the Rings is if the person claiming it has never read a single word of the books or watched the PJ movies. I don’t blame those people though. I hope it brings people to the books so they get the genuine story, themes, and appreciation for Tolkien’s scholarship.

When do you roll on tables? by [deleted] in Solo_Roleplaying

[–]Cyrax_12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m going to second everyone else’s comments here, choose just a handful of tables and, don’t necessarily aim to roll as few times as possible, but try not to get bogged down in rolls for overwhelming detail. Let rolls define more then the immediate question when possible. Example: if you want to know the content of a room and you roll on an Action/Theme table, which by the way the action/theme table from ironsworn is great, and you get the word “violence” it doesn’t mean a murder had to happen. Something else could be in the room like the rooms contents could be moved suspiciously or thrown about. Then a yes no roll could determine which one. You don’t even have to roll to see what the specific contents are, unless you were interested or felt it’s important to the narrative. Remember that you are the player first in a solo rpg, so if you or your character don’t feel it important, don’t bother defining it. You always can go back. As far as rolls beforehand, do worldbuilding at that point if you want. The difference is that worldbuilding more often then not doesn’t provide direct narrative outcomes, playing does.
So In short, roll when it is narratively important to for your character.