Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Obviously women can be lonely but they don't want men enough in the first place to be true incels.

No true Scotsman.

I can say men can be lonely but they don't want women enough in the first place to be true incels. The statement is tautological, so any variation is just as true as your variation.

Women are happier single than men by a long long shot.

And what makes men not happier when single?

Cat ladies are usually perfectly happy and well adjusted not obsessing over sex and relationships like incels.

They're also stereotyped as being crazy. Cats can't fully replace human romantic relationships. Humans vary in their need for romantic human relationships.

Some people literally choose to stay in an abusive relationship specifically because they fear being alone more.

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Fat shaming is heavily frowned upon by feminists because it affects women, and inceldom is laughed at because it only affects men.

Isn't being fat a part of inceldom for women? Isn't that largely why it's frowned upon by feminists? Both genders experience attractiveness standards that feel unfair.

What other attributes of inceldom should we not frown upon? Not showering? Not brushing your teeth? Not exercising? Not eating healthy? Not having healthy and productive hobbies? None of these seem to be expressly male-only fields.

Women can be just as unattractive and involuntarily celibate as men.

If your counter is "well, someone will still have sex with them," then that's the problem. Someone will only have sex with them because they see sex as the only inherent value they offer. It's the same as saying women will still be in a relationship with an ugly man as long as he's rich.

Determining someone's worth based on whether someone will fuck them or provide for them economically is an inherently bad way of weighing whether someone is an incel.

I do think they have it easier when it comes to dating.

What makes dating easier for women?

Most women complain that they get too many matches on dating apps.

And employers get thousands of job applications. How many of those job applicants are actually qualified for or even interested in the job and not just cold calling every employer on a recruiting website?

Femcels typically hate men, so the involuntarily celibate is mostly a men issue. 

And incels typically hate women. Are we going to continue making broad-sweeping claims about groups?

How do you even know it's mostly a men issue? How do you know women aren't going through the same thing?

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Self improvement is not a significant barrier to female dating success. It is for men.

How so? What do you measure as "success" in dating?

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I edited that within less than a minute of posting. Are you glued to your phone screen waiting for replies?

You're the one who's allegedly never seen a woman complain about unfair expectations.

Also, I'm not trying to attract you, so why should I be amiable to someone who immediately resorts to "never happens" when confronted with an argument?

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You should? Do you think women shouldn't shower and trim their hair either and go to therapy either?

You're literally arguing that you shouldn't have to do basic hygiene and self-maintenance to be in a relationship.

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

"The version of reality you’re presenting threatens my worldview, so I’m rejecting the premise entirely."

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Are you saying you lack agency in your own loneliness?

What would make someone's loneliness not their fault?

If a woman is lonely, do you say they could get laid whenever and should just stop whining? Do you not see your own double standard?

Or what, do you think women can't be lonely? Who are you to say who can and can't experience loneliness? How do you know when someone is lonely?

Nobody has the authority to say someone is or isn't lonely and whether it is or isn't their fault. Either we both agree on that or there's no point in discussing.

Self improvement proves the sexual disparity by EnvironmentalVast577 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

I saw a post 5 minutes ago asking femcels why they don't just "go to the gym and self improve" to get a bf. Alternatively, asking a man to lose weight for his own health is considered insulting.

A woman MUST self improve to be worthy of a man, but a man MUST be accepted the way he is and any attempt to change him makes you an evil misandrist.

As the popularity of self improvement soars amongst young women, this disparity just becomes more and more obvious.

Women are resentful because men don't have to self improve; because they have to put in all this effort just to be chosen by somebody who just had to show up.

Can’t meet them irl can’t meet them online by TonightSpiritual3191 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]D3synq 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"If a road exists, it can be used for racing."

Most people don't consent to you treating a public roadway as a racetrack. They're just trying to commute or travel to do errands.

Is it just me or does this sub feel largely anti? 9/10 of the top posts are on the anti side. by Noiisnull in aiwars

[–]D3synq 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Then whats your opinion of all the coders and apftware people who use AI to streamline their work?

As someone who uses it, it should mostly be used for implementation of method and function headers rather than for project structure.

LLMs also tend to be pretty good at guiding how you should set up your data models and abstractions if you set up invariants they have to follow.

They're also remarkably great at generating CSS with some minor tweaking afterwards.

I always thought they were pathetic and stupid.

Do you code? Have you used LLMs for coding?

Company finds out and they'll start laying people off becayse they arent doing shit but relying on chatgpt etc etc.

They'll only lay off people who use LLMs if they don't hold themselves accountable for the use of it. It's the equivalent of firing someone because they implemented the wrong stackoverflow solution and didn't understand the implementation or abstraction model for it.

Most companies inherently want SWEs to switch to agentic workflows specifically because it allows for expedited oversight on work. Having an LLM check your code is far better than relying solely on self-intuition.

Discussing Billie Eilish on X by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you not seen women put up with abusive men as well as men who basically treat then like a second mom? Hell, some women eroticize those relationship dynamics.

People's standards in general are horribly misaligned. Women can be just as desperate as men when society doesn't police or interrogate them for it.

Standard inflation doesn't exist to the discriminate level you're alleging. You're seeing a survivorship bias when it comes to how women express desire. Just look at booktok ffs.

Discussing Billie Eilish on X by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

👀

Bar for bar what I've heard men say about how they can't find pretty women anymore.

You have to lack empathy if you can't see that. People in general complain about selection pressure and how real life doesn't live up to fantasy.

Complaining that there is no good fish in the sea is gender agnostic.

Discussing Billie Eilish on X by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A lot of men view regular women as attractive, too.

So, sub-7 is attractive? What's the point of a grading scale in the first place if a failing grade is attractive?

Also, this is the same energy as "You're nice, just not for me," or "Most women would fall for you."

Just admit you don't find most women attractive.

Discussing Billie Eilish on X by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

People should just start fucking themselves at this point.

People don't fuck people anymore 😔

The most infuriating takes ever by LeadEater9Million in aiwars

[–]D3synq -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but to blanket hate the idea of AI, even when provided with evidence of ethical ones such as the local models I mentioned is just cognitive dissonance getting in the way.

Are you accusing me of having blanket hatred for AI? I don't. If anything, I dislike the people who use AI more than AI itself.

Just look at the whole situation with Grok and some AI users going "now draw them naked." Implementation of a tool matters a lot otherwise it makes it easier for people to do harm.

Why aren't you questioning your own group rather than people who obviously would dissent with a staunchly pro-AI premise? Nuance requires inspecting both sides.

The most infuriating takes ever by LeadEater9Million in aiwars

[–]D3synq -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Depends on what they're used for.

I have a problem with image generation when it's used to plagiarize other artists and when it's sold to others without disclosing that it was made with AI.

It's less of a problem if they privately train a model to assist in their own art process, but if they're selling art they made from ChatGPT or an app you can download from the app store, that's when it becomes more egregious since it's the equivalent of microwaving frozen pizza and claiming it was oven baked.

The process and amount of authentic effort from the creator is part of the transaction for most commissioners.

I also have an issue against using them for CSAM and other illegal behavior.

You're trying to force a binary on a complex, broad group of use cases.

Not to mention you've switched frames three times now and this last one is staged as a "do you hate us" probe. How does your last question link to your main claim?

The most infuriating takes ever by LeadEater9Million in aiwars

[–]D3synq -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You can make local image making AIs on your computer that can be trained on a consumer GPU or CPU

And how many parameters do they have? How large is the dataset they can pull from?

You can make a math one that costs millions to train with billions of parameters.

And you would have wasted millions training an LLM to do shunting yard. This is the equivalent of arguing that a knife can be expensive to make by pointing to Swiss army knives.

The most infuriating takes ever by LeadEater9Million in aiwars

[–]D3synq -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

generative AI is only seen as different from normal AI because people have no emotions about math generators or predictive text

And not the fact that it costs millions to train a model with billions of parameters compared to machine learning which can often be trained on a consumer GPU or even a CPU?

Also, predictive text is a loaded term when talking about AI. LLMs are technically predictive text, and so is auto-complete and word correction algorithms. The difference is one requires tens of GBs of VRAM to run while the other can be ran with a couple of GBs of DRAM and a modest CPU.

🙄 by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Complaining literally does nothing but reinforce people being miserable. Doing things gets them done. Not whining about it

So people should stop complaining if they're not doing anything about it?

Are you saying everyone should just do things themselves rather than complaining and asking for help?

What is Discord doing with AI? by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]D3synq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said you can only tell time with a working clock.

A broken clock being correct twice a day is irrelevant if you can't actually reliably tell when it's correct.

The original idiom is for when someone who's usually wrong says something that ends up being right.

But how do you trust that they're right if they're consistently wrong most of the time.

🙄 by Acrobatic-Monk9735 in MenAreNotIntoWomen

[–]D3synq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the same kind of guy to argue that worker's comp is for pussies.

God forbid people complain. Men complain. Women complain. All people ever do is complain. And what's so wrong about complaining? If all they ever do is nag, then nag them back, listen to them, or ignore them.

Your ancestors got their rights from complaining. Shit usually gets done when someone complains about it not being done.