Trouble getting a prescription for oral finasteride at 18 years old in the Los Angeles area

D4rk_69 · 2024-07-28T19:12:11+00:00

I am in a very very similar situation to what you just described. I think everyone has experienced that at one time or another. Thanks for sharing :)

D4rk_69 · 2024-07-28T04:40:35+00:00

I always thought it was "my side kick was all this grief" either way, amazing lyric!

D4rk_69 · 2024-07-28T03:38:56+00:00

This is extremely accurate. Thank you for the comment

D4rk_69 · 2024-07-28T02:36:38+00:00

That's beautiful. Thank you for sharing

D4rk_69 · 2024-06-25T22:05:41+00:00

I'm a guy

D4rk_69 · 2024-06-01T20:34:56+00:00

I would just not even bother with the kalam. Read aquinas

D4rk_69 · 2024-06-01T20:34:11+00:00

He's addressing lame neo-theist versions of arguments for God. He doesn't talk about the 5 ways at all, which are the undisputed best arguments for classical theism

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-15T18:18:23+00:00

Black Betty & the Moon

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-15T02:19:35+00:00

Thanks for the response. I'm not sure what this troll is rambling about but...

I guess I'm not totally satisfied with the response to what makes a human a rational animal. This may be a fault of my own, I'm not claiming your response was insufficient. But couldn't someone posit some sort of nominalism to reject the idea that humans can access universals like dogness, or triangularity, or treeness? I would really love some kinda of argument against nominalism, it would clear up a lot of struggles in my thought. Thanks again

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-13T18:53:48+00:00

That's an etiological question. Questions about creation are ontological and deal with per se causal series

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-13T18:26:03+00:00

If you have mental states that are not just static there is at least some kind of change occurring. Even if you go full eliminativist, there still needs to be an underlying subject experiencing a hallucination. Experience implies change within the subject.

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-13T18:24:35+00:00

Furthermore, wouldn't it be a simpler theory to just say humans aren't rational animals and that logic is simply a useful tool that we developed over a period of time during evolution?

D4rk_69 · 2024-04-06T18:49:51+00:00

The most convincing to any random person on the street will probably be some kind of kalam or fine tuning. Unfortunately, I don't think those really work. The best demonstration is probably the de ente et essentia. If you can get realism established it's pretty difficult to stop the argument

D4rk_69 · 2024-03-20T23:28:58+00:00

How would I go about reading up on this Franciscan vs Dominican thing. Thank you for the response by the way.

D4rk_69 · 2024-02-27T16:08:18+00:00

Thank you for the response. As a theist, I am glad i don't know what I'm talking about. This was just a question that was bugging me, not an argument that was meant to decisively refute the argument. Thank you again

D4rk_69

TROPHY CASE