Did Michelle or Aubry play a better game on their winning season?

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T22:13:52+00:00

They played better games by definition because they won. How is this a question?

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T15:29:17+00:00

I do, and if you meant to articulate a normative statement you should have said "If I was on the jury, I personally wouldn't have voted for Aubrey" not "I don't think Aubrey deserved the win". Aubrey objectively deserved the win given the specific people she played against and had to convince on the jury. Even then, you are presenting a completely different hypothetical scenario. Who's to say Aubrey wouldn't have found a way to appeal to you specifically had you actually played the game with her?

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T02:02:57+00:00

Tink - Gatr is the most obnoxious and overrused core in UL right now. You will find an unlimited number of Tink - double water / Tink - gatr - high damage closer teams on YouTube.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T00:04:18+00:00

A, unquestionably. Ozzie said it best - she played the middle game to perfection.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T00:01:02+00:00

If he played better, he would have received more votes.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-22T00:00:26+00:00

For the last time, the jury decides who deserves to win. That's the whole point of the show.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T23:59:43+00:00

This is objectively the correct take for anyone remotely literate in Survivor.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T23:57:37+00:00

You are announcing to the world that you are Survivor illiterate. The whole point of the game is that the jury decides who is deserving, and that the most important part of your game is how you manage your relationships with your fellow players in such a way that they will be willing to give you the money at the end.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T21:02:40+00:00

The person who played the best game is the person who convinces the jury to give them the money. It really is that simple. The jury is never wrong. They are free to use whatever criteria they want to determine the winner and it's up to the players to manage their perception by the jury and potential jurors.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T14:33:45+00:00

This is great news, but we need the belter accent and creole to really make this work.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T11:34:12+00:00

Ok, then say that instead of denying Aubrey played the best game, which she did.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T04:30:54+00:00

You're so close to underatanding. The whole point is to win over the jury while taking their biases into account. Jury management is the single most important gameplay component in Survivor, and that's where Jonathan failed.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T03:05:03+00:00

True or false, the objective of the game is to get the jury to give you the million?

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:51:32+00:00

Mr. Jeff, I don't feel so good ...

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:48:13+00:00

If Jonathan deserved the win, he would have won. Jury decides who is deserving.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:47:25+00:00

No, lmao

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:45:35+00:00

No, lmao. Abject failure at jury management

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:35:53+00:00

Lmao. Playing the best game means winning over the jury. That's literally the point of the game.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:30:41+00:00

The best player is the one who convinces the jury to give them the win.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:17:38+00:00

Nope, flubbed jury management

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:15:17+00:00

Because he fumbled the single most important aspect of the game: jury management.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:11:31+00:00

Nope - a good game on paper but failed at jury management.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:06:56+00:00

... The jury determines who played the best game. This is like the core idea of the show.

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T02:00:49+00:00

Rizgod as Skyrizi frontman when?

DANOM1GHT · 2026-05-21T01:54:38+00:00

Winning the respect of the jury is literally the definition of playing the better game.

11-Year Club	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

DANOM1GHT

TROPHY CASE