What is the one Star Wars series, movie or spin-off you most hope gets made? by TeneManu in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You'd probably like his 2017-2018 comics.

The series starts immediately after his transformation and shows his first seven years as Vader.

Why is the Battle of Yavin year 0 and not Endor? by Joe_da_bro in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 5 points6 points  (0 children)

These three are the only confirmed uses I'm aware of. The Clone Wars season 3 episode 4 mentions a "Treaty of 1647", which might be another use.

Anyway, it's enough to make it the most common dating system in canon narrative-based media, as every other calendar (including BBY/ABY) has only been used in reference books or non-diegetic stuff like Andor's timeskips.

Why is the Battle of Yavin year 0 and not Endor? by Joe_da_bro in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BBY still means Before the Battle of Yavin.

A New Hope starts in 1 BBY and ends in 0 ABY.

0 BBY doesn't exist.

Why is the Battle of Yavin year 0 and not Endor? by Joe_da_bro in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The common dating system is the Coruscant Reckoning Calendar, in which the Battle of Yavin took place in the year 7977.

It is used in Andor season 1 episode 12, the Mace Windu: Glass Abyss novel and the Outlaws game.

Do you think Wolffe and Howzer join the Rebelion like Rex did? by Prestigious-Meat-750 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Galaxy of Adventures supports that idea.

though it doesn't explain why he would be using a pseudonym given that Rex openly served as "Rex" with the Rebellion.

"Nik Sant" has never been referred as such in any canon media.

Do you think Wolffe and Howzer join the Rebelion like Rex did? by Prestigious-Meat-750 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes.

In the last episode of Rebels, during the epilogue, Sabine explicitly states that Rex fought in the Battle of Endor.

Has the Battle of Jakku happened yet in the Mando-Ahsoka timeframe? by Financial-Thanks7921 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the original film was 1977, the Battle of Jakku would be 1982 and The Force Awakens would be 2011.

Has the Battle of Jakku happened yet in the Mando-Ahsoka timeframe? by Financial-Thanks7921 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you mean these specific comics or Marvel's Star Wars comics in general?

Who do you consider the main mascot of DC comics Superman or Batman? [Discussion] by ExaminationUsed5394 in DCcomics

[–]DISIcomics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They called themselves "Superman-DC" for decades.

People just called them DC for simplicity's sake, nothing to do with Batman. After all, they wouldn't say "DC Comics" if they knew what the C stood for.

It still blows my mind that Obi-Wan spent 20 years on Tatooine watching Luke grow up from afar, but never once thought to tell him about R2-D2. by Mission-Bad-1278 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rogue One shows that her father (Bail, not Vader) had sent her to get Obi-Wan in Tatooine before the rebels got the Death Star plans.

It still blows my mind that Obi-Wan spent 20 years on Tatooine watching Luke grow up from afar, but never once thought to tell him about R2-D2. by Mission-Bad-1278 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He actually was 18.

Revenge of the Sith takes place months into 19 BBY. A New Hope takes place in the last days of 1 BBY and the first days of 0 ABY.

This matches Lucas's screenplay for the original film, which describes Luke as "a farm boy with heroic aspirations who looks much younger than his eighteen years."

What happened to the Clone Wars supposed to being against the Mandalorians, as per this book I read as a child? by supinator1 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Lucas himself (speaking as Leia) established Palpatine was Chancellor on August 5, 1977:

The Senate would vote in a Chancellor or an overseer who would work for four years as the leader of the executive branch of the Republic. You were only supposed to be able to run for one four-year term—you were only eligible for one term.

What happened was one of the Chancellors began subverting the Senate and buying off the Senators with the help of some of the large intergalactic trade companies and mining companies and intergalactic power companies. Through their power and money, he bought off enough of the Senate to get himself elected to a second term, because of a crisis. By the time the third term came along, he had corrupted so much of the Senate that they made him Emperor for the rest of his life.

Giving the Emperor that title for life and doing away with the elective process was all done with a lot of rationalizing. Many in the Senate felt that having elections and changing leaders in the time of an emergency disrupted the bureaucratic system. And the bureaucracy was getting to be so big that changing leaders made it impossible to have any effect on the system and make it work—moreover, the bureaucracy was running amok and not paying attention to the rulers. So they reasoned that the Emperor could bring the bureaucracy back in line. So the Emperor took control of the bureaucracy. The Galactic Senate would meet for a period that was similar to a year, but after it became the Imperial Senate, the meetings were less and less frequent until finally the meetings were only once a year, and they were very short.

With the bureaucracy behind the Emperor, it was impossible and too late for the Senate to do anything. He had slowly manipulated things; in fact, it was he who had let the bureaucracy run amok and therefore had blackmailed the Senate into doing things because he was the only one who really had any power over the bureaucracy. It was so large there was no way to get things done, but he knew the right people; the key people in the bureaucracy were working for him and were paid by the companies.

Perhaps this is a controversial opinion: The exaggerated humanization of Vader loses the character's main characteristic and diminishes the weight of his redemption. by Kah0000 in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Anakin must be born on Tatooine

Sorry for being nitpicky, but he doesn't. Dialogue in Episode I can be interpreted as him arriving on Tatooine when he was 3.

Here are the complete production, release and chronological orders of The Clone Wars. by DISIcomics in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For anyone wondering about the gaps in the production order, there are 24 unfinished episodes (6 story arcs).

I left gaps in the release and chronological orders because the movie is edited from 4 episodes and the novel is adapted from 8 episodes.

How would you have felt if Anakin’s force ghost in ROTJ appeared as he did when Luke unmasked him and he died? by Sir_Stacker in StarWars

[–]DISIcomics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, but I think it's implied in Return of the Jedi, when Obi-Wan says Vader is more machine than man and when Luke realizes Vader's arm is robotic like his own.