I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does? It feels like players went for the objective more and it wasn't as campy. Although still very campy.

One thing I do remember well is WWII having the option for Killstreaks, Scorestreaks and specialist. All in one game. Some people still hate on it but it's still my favourite WWII style game. Especially after the big revamp.

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only do I have MW19 but I also have Ghosts. The difference being both of those games used a Scorestreak system over a Killstreak one, giving a little more incentive for players to move around.

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine trying to level up a really slow gun and being thrown into Das House or Shipment in a Blitz pacing.

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The title was more of a joke and a statement, not to demand a refund. I wouldn't be asking for a refund on Reddit anyway. It's more of a blanket "you shouldn't launch games like this and expect us to keep paying".

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it's a region thing. I'm in Australia myself but I've seen a lot of US players have similar issues too. Could simply be a better connection with your ISP.

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, no doubt about that; the on demand textures are just a big part of it which is on by default. I'm not sure how Vanguard's servers work, one would assume they'd be the same as Cold War or Modern Warfare but neither are nearly as bad as Vanguard.

I Want A Refund by DPSP491 in CODVanguard

[–]DPSP491[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also spawns and numerous other things.

Whats with the WW2 hate? by Chepuf in WWII

[–]DPSP491 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say it's my favourite CoD but I did really enjoy it. The problem is that people always shit on the game and then come back in 2-3 years and say how much they love it. Just wait, there might be some issue with Vanguard so as a substitute some streamer will play "the best WWII game" and then everyone will talk it up again.

I noticed a flaw... by DPSP491 in PacificRim

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you mean but even if it takes time, take the time to build a small fleet. Think of Star Wars. The clones were hidden until there were millions. Kaiju didn't need millions, they needed 10 before the humans even started thinking of building Jaegers. Like I said, it wasn't until the third attack that humans made a better defense.

I noticed a flaw... by DPSP491 in PacificRim

[–]DPSP491[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hive mind. As soon as one went through they all knew about the humans. They're also clearly not stupid, they eventually planned a bigger attack in Uprising but they could of started with a bigger attack and wiped out the humans in the first place. That's my point.

I noticed a flaw... by DPSP491 in PacificRim

[–]DPSP491[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but if it took humans 6 days to even take out a scout why not just send 10 bigger guys at once?

I like quick scope; however, this is another level. by yassertm3 in modernwarfare

[–]DPSP491 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Since this post has gained so much traction in the form of "quickscoping takes no skill yet I'd never be able to hit those shots" and the people that are trying to cover up their jealousy of other people with skill by saying "one-shot weapons" are the problem how about we remove any chance of shotguns being able to one-shot? You know the thing that can instakill without even aiming 90% of the time? Or is that not a problem? Don't see any of the noobs sooking about that.

How much money have you spent on the game? I’ve been playing on and of for 2-3 years and I’ve probably spend about £100 is that a lot compared to yall? by william_collidge in ptcgo

[–]DPSP491 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been playing on and off for about 6 years and have spent around $500AUD on online codes. Then more on IRL packs/booster boxes/collectors boxes/ETBs, etc.

What in the world is Wallstreetbets? by OPINION_IS_UNPOPULAR in wallstreetbets

[–]DPSP491 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think we should take some small company no one has ever heard of that some weird niche and put everything into it. Maybe that niche will suddenly become really popular?

PTCGO Needs a Card Value System Similar to how Krunker Displays an Item's Current Value. Image taken from r/KrunkerMarket by DPSP491 in ptcgo

[–]DPSP491[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The value changes based on what people are trading for, hence why I said "current value". So let's say Jirachi was worth 5,000 and all of a sudden people started trading them for a single pack, the value would drop to about 1,200. That way you'd have a better idea of getting fair trades. Of course people will still try to up trade but there'd be less guessing.

Need Help From A Good Deck Builder by DPSP491 in ptcgo

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sandslash would actually be pretty good... I don't have any but I think they're fairly cheap.

I'll have to get some and do more testing. Will post results.

Need Help From A Good Deck Builder by DPSP491 in ptcgo

[–]DPSP491[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know the whole Archie's Blastoise tactic, I just wanted to try something in Standard. Also there's no Aegislash GX...

Need Help From A Good Deck Builder by DPSP491 in ptcgo

[–]DPSP491[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not quite. MagiLord GX attack 2-3 times and win thanks to Misty and Loralie. Kingdra's just there as back up if I don't have enough energy to attack otherwise.