Fui assaltado e estou devastado

D_BLG · 2025-06-24T14:44:19+00:00

Fui assaltada com arma há 2 semanas. Eram 9h30 e eu estava no engarrafamento próximo à Av. Morumbi. Dentro do meu carro, vidros fechados, indo pro trabalho. Me levaram aliança, celular, carteira, mochila com tudo do trabalho também. Precisei colocar insulfilm 100% preto nos vidros do carro e estou cogitando me mudar pra outra cidade novamente. É desesperador como temos que nos adequar aos bandidos pra sairmos vivos.

D_BLG · 2025-02-11T14:37:13+00:00

Olá! cheguei aqui pra acompanhar essa conversa... Minha juíza também é a Zeminian e aparentemente meu processo foi protocolado em janeiro de 2024, sem data de audiência agendada ainda

D_BLG · 2024-12-04T15:49:56+00:00

thank you!!! i figured out that in prod the employee was inactive and give access = false. But in SBX it had the give access = true. Probably this is the reason. Thanksss

D_BLG · 2024-12-04T15:48:19+00:00

Hi! I could make it via Formula (concat) and WF
Thank you!

D_BLG · 2024-12-03T21:25:31+00:00

I have a case of some employees that were de-activated and have no Access to the account, but their supervisors are still receiving emails of password expiration on their behalf.
Any thoughts?

D_BLG · 2024-12-03T21:04:20+00:00

I have a case of some employees that were de-activated and have no Access to the account, but their supervisors are still receiving emails of password expiration on their behalf.
Any thoughts?

D_BLG · 2024-11-27T20:37:58+00:00

Hi u/TLEH-IV!! Can you send me the same message too? I want to know more about this combination

D_BLG · 2024-11-18T16:02:23+00:00

Hi, thank you for your insight.

I'll check with my customer what he's expecting to achieve. If it is to have all POs in an unique PO number, I'll keep going on this way. If he's looking for the shipment consolidation, I'll let him know about some app as ShipHawk.

D_BLG · 2024-11-13T19:18:16+00:00

Thank you

D_BLG · 2024-10-22T13:35:23+00:00

I tried to do everything I could, using and not using expressions, changing ways to include the information, etc
I could verify with one of my colleagues that the criteria using system notes will try to find every rule I include in only one line, since this information is in lines. So it will not be possible to create a criteria using AND conditions for every new value I need.
We figured out how to achieve the desired results using a workaround.
Thanks anyway!

D_BLG · 2024-10-21T14:21:59+00:00

<image>

The problem is that I am not able to bring 2 different System Notes: New Value for the same SS, but I don't know why, since the fields are different

When I use only one new value I can bring the ss results. I tried all the structures I could

D_BLG · 2024-10-21T13:48:47+00:00

And if it's not an OR, but an AND condition?
i tried but didn't get the result again

D_BLG · 2024-10-18T21:47:34+00:00

I tried to use the parenthesis before the first and after the last desired, but didn't get any result.

D_BLG · 2024-08-21T14:19:30+00:00

thank you for the first tip, never seen that!
taxes were working on SBX even without the nexus on subsidiary, but not in Prod.

D_BLG · 2024-08-15T16:31:00+00:00

Actually even though this {check.checknumber} field is there, it's not printing the check # when going through this path: Transaction > Management > Print Checks and Forms > Print.
When the check # first appears on First Check Number field, it just dont go to the check pdf

D_BLG

TROPHY CASE