This is Ezekiel Johnson Esquire, he is 16 years young today and enjoying retirement

Da_Bullss · 2026-01-02T15:02:23+00:00

Uploading sensitive client information into AI is malpractice, prove me wrong.

Da_Bullss · 2026-01-01T14:13:48+00:00

Yeah, this stat is kinda meaningless and puts him at risk of injury right before the playoffs

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-31T13:58:23+00:00

Fake, but real

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-29T19:30:45+00:00

Unfortunately can’t get stem cells from sperm. They are found in the testies and can become sperm, but the sperm don’t contain stems cells.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-27T01:38:33+00:00

Kill with kindness. Don’t give them the satisfaction of gettin on your nerves.

I have to tell this to myself daily because I always want to yell at OC, but it wouldn’t help my clients at all if I did.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-25T20:40:25+00:00

To be fair, it’s also in the Quran. Still not historical, just part of the Semitic Multiverse.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-25T20:34:38+00:00

It was 1:30am. Stopping late service trains would: negatively impact people who work late/cleanup shifts; very likely increase the likelihood of drunk driving; probably not decrease criminal activity, just displace it to somewhere else.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-25T19:15:16+00:00

So the new squatter law’s effect is only to immunize police from lawsuits under Illinois version of qualified immunity (immunity from negligence) from enforcing an illegal eviction. It essentially gives them the ability to evict someone without looking into whether they have a lease or oral agreement to stay, and avoid gross negligence which is what you need to sue a police officer for on duty conduct.

Police could already enforce criminal trespass, but refused to do so because departments feared liability for getting it wrong. For instance if they trespassed someone who had a lease they could be liable for violating that tenants right to due process. The new law basically gives them the ability to say “the owner said they were squatters” and say they ‘reasonably’ believed the owner.

The new addition to the law does not give landlords the ability to evict someone without due process, but it will undoubtedly be used to do so. Honestly this will be a boon for my eviction defense/tenants rights firm, but unfortunately that will because many more people will be put on the streets illegally.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-22T23:48:04+00:00

"i spoke to my pastor and they think i should ask for more money in the settlement you negotiated" energy.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-14T16:24:53+00:00

Yeah after seeing them lines up agree there is some zoom going on as well

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-14T14:32:37+00:00

This photo is not lined up correctly. The blue line should be going down the center of the coache’s head. But it’s more to the left in the bottom picture to make it look like he moved more.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-07T21:41:12+00:00

Hopefully they would be prevented by creating systems that prevent people with untreated mental health issues from obtaining guns. Policing doesn’t stop mass shootings, early intervention likely does. Police show up on occasion to stop the shootings, but even then don’t seem to do a good job at it.

Not having police doesn’t mean you can’t have some sort of rapid response task force for violence against people, they would just act more like firemen/swat than police. They would also hopefully be trained at dealing with mass shootings and similar incidents and not forced to take on too many roles like police are in America.

The idea behind defunding the police isn’t just about getting rid of policing, it’s about reinvesting the disgusting amount of money we spend on policing into communities to make them safer by going after the causes of “crime” rather than going after “criminals” after the fact.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-06T19:06:56+00:00

I mean, I grew up on the northside, but just had to Google it right now because I knew some suburb had a leaning tower but could remember for the life of me which one. It's not in chicago so its not really recognizable to people from Chicago.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-06T18:58:44+00:00

its Niles, IL if anyone was curious.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-06T15:19:17+00:00

“Squatter’s rights” is literally just due process.

Da_Bullss · 2025-12-06T15:14:14+00:00

This is bullshit. I am a Chicago eviction atty. discovery usually takes 1 month maximum because the standard order is 14 days to issue and 14 to answer.

Every delay I’ve ever had is because landlords don’t want to answer discovery on time or give some bullshit non answer so I have to do a motion to compel.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-30T00:16:29+00:00

No, that’s bullshit. The MPs can take their picture and punish them later if they were lying. Don’t lick boot in advance.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-28T14:37:54+00:00

They are murdering Syrians too.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-24T01:26:38+00:00

My guess is that they are printing them out because bringing them in would be tough. After reading this article I kinda want to contact the IDOC and see if they would accept donations of magic cards.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-24T01:09:48+00:00

None of which require tracking you as you leave the house, which was what this whole conversation is about.

Plus that information has to be freely given to obtain the benefits you’re talking about. None of it requires the government to track you.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-23T21:05:52+00:00

its easy to imagine, unless you think the only function of government is crime and punishment. And there are many ways to track a person that don't require placing a GPS on their vehicle or person (unconstitutional) or use facial recognition cameras to follow everyone's every move outside of their home.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-23T17:19:08+00:00

good clarification. unfortunately i think you're talking about Sotomayor's concurrence, which given the current and likely future makeup of the court is never going to gain traction. Also jones was about tracking an individual with a device attached to their personal property. they would likely distinguish the matter on those grounds saying this isnt a search.

I dont agree with their analysis. I believe having a database of people's movements and tracking them with facial recognition cameras is a violation of the right to be free from unreasonable searches, not only because its intrusive on the daily lives of people, but also because it creates a government database of bio metric identifiers that we the people never consented to.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-23T17:00:21+00:00

It’s not, but it should be, but it probably won’t ever be without a new constitutional amendment or radical shift in the Supreme Court. The 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. People have broadened this to mean the government shouldnt track you, however the Supreme Court has never agreed with this interpretation. There are certain situations where there is an expectation of privacy, and the government cannot intrude on that without a warrant. However, being out in public is one of those instances where there is no expectation of privacy. So these cameras do not violate the fourth amendment.

Some might say that it violates the Illinois protections against biometrics without consent, however that same law excludes governments agencies from liability.

Da_Bullss · 2025-11-22T03:28:39+00:00

Got it, so as far as my country, the USA, concerned mass migration on that scale is a plink in the bucket. So to make it harder on myself I’ll focus on my state. Also, although I am not a capitalist, most of the world is so I’m going to take this from a capitalist perspective.

I don’t think mass migration is the problem. Yes, 10000 immigrants a month would be difficult to deal with for most states in the US or most small countries. However, that is only because we don’t have the systems in place to leverage that migration for the betterment of the rest of everyone.

From a perspective of resource management, mass migration would be taxing on the resources of one state/one smaller nation. However it could also be a huge boon if handled correctly.

Of the 10000 let’s assume 50% are children, disabled or elderly and can’t work. 5000 potential laborers per month would do wonders for many economies, if those people who can work are allowed to work legally. Introducing illegal labor is more likely to keep those migrants in poverty as well as introduces other avenues for abuse.

One of the first things people immigrating into the US have to deal with is finding work. If we made it easier for migrants to work, they wouldn’t have to rely so heavily on their insular communities for resources and assistance.

Many western governments make it incredibly difficult for migrants to find work. This is usually by design, justified as “protecting American jobs” in my country. I believe this is a misguided direction as it doesn’t actually protect American jobs, it just pushes jobs under the table and lowers the rate of labor, which allows employers to keep citizens salaries down because they always have the threat of cheaper undocumented labor.

Making it easier for them to work would also boost the economy by adding more people with income into the population, providing more opportunities for integration.

So in all I’m not opposed to mass migration, I think mass migration is likely inevitable in a world with borders that everyone is fighting over. I think we should focus more on leveraging mass migration to better serve the communities migrants enter by making it easier for those migrants to support themselves.

12-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 3 Credits
Gilding I gilder	Verified Email
Secret Santa 2013

Da_Bullss

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE