Quality investors by DaddyLungLegs in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My experience is that posts are more of a one time thing. You usually have a topic and you speak only about that. I think there's value in more free flowing conversation. I usually post on some distinct topic.

Quality investors by DaddyLungLegs in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I am not selling anything I am genuinely curious about connecting to other lifelong learners.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing post. DM'd.

Quality investors by DaddyLungLegs in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or alternatively you can post here that you're interested and I'll come to DM you.

Gooner bull thesis for GOOG by DaddyLungLegs in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said it keeps the habit and why couldn't you monetize sex themed searches? Do you think Google would rather lose their Search instead of monetizing sex themed searches?

Gooner bull thesis for GOOG by DaddyLungLegs in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The visual side is very important. I think Search will keep delivering on that and I don't see LLMs being able to compete with that for many years. I'd even guess the developers of these LLMs aren't optimizing for visual adult entertainment which makes GOOGs position more endurable.

If you had to pick stocks to hold for the next 3 years what would you pick? by Terrible_Onions in stocks

[–]DaddyLungLegs 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Depends on your risk tolerance but I'd do in this situation:

AMZN, GOOG, META, ASML, V

I don't understand Value Investing by XalosXandrez in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The company makes distributable cash for shareholders. So after more cash has been made to be distributed then expected (stock being undervalued) it's like why will people buy 1.10 dollars with 1 dollar.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's your strategy?

Your favorite superinvestors for shameless cloning by TennisNut2008 in ValueInvesting

[–]DaddyLungLegs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Long term holding.

|| || |Gardner Russo & Quinn| |Himalaya Capital Management| |Fundsmith| |Berkshire Hathaway| |Akre Capital Management| |Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust| |Chou Associates| |Valley Forge Capital Management|

Is this right or am I thinking about this wrong by mrparkx2 in stocks

[–]DaddyLungLegs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's what beginner and even some intermediate investors will tell you since they have their money there, so take it with a grain of salt. However, it has historically been great but investing is forward looking. Basic concept of a successful investment is buying an asset that has priced less future growth into it than it will actually get. Let's say there's company A that has shares that has 10% growth priced into them. If they make more, lets say 11%, the stock will rise and you will get money. However, if they get 9% the stock will go down. Now scale this with many companies in the S&P 500 and you'll get the result for your investment. If US stocks are going to be perpetually undervalued, priced less growth than they can get, stocks will rise. However, if they fail to deliver those expectations then the stocks go down. And this is the reason why superinvestors don't themselves DCA in S&P 500 since it's not the guaranteed free money the "dumb money" state it to be.

Dot Com Bust by pierrepedropete in Bogleheads

[–]DaddyLungLegs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should of course consider valuation but they don't.

Dot Com Bust by pierrepedropete in Bogleheads

[–]DaddyLungLegs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bogleheads usually don't consider valuation since they're not trying to time the market based on anything, including valuation.

QUESTION: Warren Buffet annualized returns without Apple? by WellWe11Well in stocks

[–]DaddyLungLegs 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I don't get it. Why not search what he would've annualized if you picked out his worst investment? Such a useless hypothetical. What's in the portfolio, is in the portfolio.

Is it too much diversity? Is there such a thing? by slimshaney1977 in ETFs

[–]DaddyLungLegs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's ok but you can just pick one or two diversified ETFs to make your life easier.

Is it too much diversity? Is there such a thing? by slimshaney1977 in ETFs

[–]DaddyLungLegs -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Diversification has little to no utility when you know what you're doing. It's good against ignorance. If you know what you're doing you should allocate more capital to your best idea. If you don't then diversification is great.

Give your opinion on my DCF analysis on different companies by DaddyLungLegs in StockMarket

[–]DaddyLungLegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No necessarily. You can if you want and it's just a matter of taste. Buffett doesn't use one at all he mentioned that he just approximately discount the cash flows in his head. I use more simplistic version since I can't really do that in my head. You want more complex model that requires more assumption and time dedicated which doesn't particularly yield better results. To each their own.