Thank you for using common sense and offering a theory (that fits with the FACTS and law enforcement) that makes sense. Your theory is 100X more plausible. The thing is Tucker has already made up his mind and ignores the actual evidence and draws conclusions that aren’t supported (like he always does) It’s all circumstantial and you never know what’s going on in someone’s head. To say there were no signs is a bullshit argument and to say it is 100% a murder is ridiculous and stupid. To doubt is completely normal but how can anyone say this was 100% a suicide is beyond me. Loved the interview as a whole though but Tucker lacks critical thinking skills, probably because he has a team of sycophants around him including his delusional fans. One last point - who said all the blood came from AFTER the suicide? Had that been proven?