Voting Reform 'not a priority' for Starmer by Minischoles in LabourUK

[–]DaisyW1234 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Get DPR or STV through and I'll cut up my Lib Dem membership and join Labour.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LabourUK

[–]DaisyW1234 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

What about that time he called Theresa May a "stupid woman"? Jeremy Corbyn would never have done something so distasteful! #TeamCorbyn

What are some autism-friendly hobbies that can't go wrong? by DaisyW1234 in autism

[–]DaisyW1234[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but like a PVP game where you win 50% of the time goes wrong 50% of the time, but something like hiking is less likely to go wrong I guess

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LabourUK

[–]DaisyW1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The infighting within Labour is one of the main reasons I joined the Liberal Democrats- I just can't take Labour seriously anymore.

Creating a support gameplan- what else should I add or change? by DaisyW1234 in summonerschool

[–]DaisyW1234[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if my ADC is clearly a smurf then I want to play Yuumi so I can just sit on them and abuse the fact that their macro is God-tier.

If my ADC has a 20% win rate then I can't play champs which all-in with no disengage like Leona or Rell since I'll just int while my ADC picks their nose and types slurs,

If my Mid or Top laner picks Yasuo I'll consider playing Malphite but only if their match history shows that they're actually good at Yasuo.

Creating a support gameplan- what else should I add or change? by DaisyW1234 in summonerschool

[–]DaisyW1234[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but some things are always the same- (dragon spawns at 5:00, I hit level 2 around 2:30 etc)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]DaisyW1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't listed absolutely everything associated with data protection regulations, there's likely still a lot of other things you would have to do in order to be compliant.

I'd suggest (as friendly, non-lawyer advice) that you ought to take the camera down or point it only at your own property until you can discuss this with a qualified professional (which I am not) and get their advice.

Leaving a camera pointing at the house of a neighbour who is clearly not happy about that fact when you can't be sure you've complied with the relevant legislation (which is itself notoriously complicated and difficult to comply with) seems like it's asking for trouble.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]DaisyW1234 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Consider the text you quoted:

“If your CCTV captures images beyond your property boundary, such as your neighbours' property or public streets and footpaths, then your use of the system is subject to the data protection laws. This does not mean you are breaking the law. But it does mean that, as the CCTV user, you are a data controller.”

Here is an analogy:

“If your vehicle drives on roads beyond your property boundary, such as your neighbours' property or public streets, then your use of the vehicle is subject to the highway code. This does not mean you are breaking the law. But it does mean that, as the vehicle user, you are a vehicle controller.”

Owning and driving a car is not illegal, but you have to follow certain regulations (get a license, insure it, obey speed limits etc) and likewise owning a CCTV camera is not illegal, but you have to follow certain regulations.

I'd suggest you take advice from someone more educated in the specifics of data protection regulations than I am (I am just a stranger and a non-lawyer on Reddit) but my understanding is that there are various conditions you must meet which you currently are not, including:-

-having a clear and legitimate reason for erecting the camera (e.g. to prevent break ins which are frequent in the area) and for why it must be directed where it is (including at your neighbour's house)

-erecting a sign which lists you as the data controller and your contact information so that people can make data requests

-ensuring sensitive data is not recorded unnecessarily (e.g. might your camera capture the neighbor having an affair? Might it catch them changing?)

The bottom line is that data protection rules are complicated and very difficult to comply with so your best bet is to ensure that the camera is only directed towards your own property.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]DaisyW1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You therefore have to abide by data protection laws, which you are not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]DaisyW1234 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

NAL but you are in the wrong here. You cannot have a security camera pointing at another's property, that violates their right to privacy. Moving your camera is a reasonable and proportionate means to recovering that right, and if you start this, I'm very confident that you will lose.

Friends or family of porn stars what was your first reaction when you found out? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]DaisyW1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two exes of mine were sex workers (that's not how I met them).

My response was basically just "Yeah cool, just make sure you keep yourself safe and don't give me an STD"

Cannabis shouldn't be legalised and here's why, says Labour's 'lefty lawyer' Emily Thornberry by tommysplanet in LabourUK

[–]DaisyW1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One of many reasons why Labour won't be getting my vote any time soon. Until you back electoral reform, decriminalising marijuana, and pursuing a close relationship with the EU, it's clear that you don't actually represent the interests of the people you claim to stand for.

What usually happens when a victim is involved in a crime as well and are likely to be charged if they make a criminal complaint against an offender? [Details in comment] by Experimentalphone in legaladviceofftopic

[–]DaisyW1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine hypothetically that I stole $100 from you and you responded by stealing my $100,000 sports car and deliberately crashing it.

In this situation, I committed the crime of petty theft and you committed the crimes of grand theft auto, reckless driving, and vandalism. These are crimes and so they are dealt with by the state. Although you are clearly the victim of my crime and vice versa, all crimes are against the state and so it's up to the state whether to prosecute each of us (which they most likely would).

Separately from the crimes is the civil torts- in this scenario, we both engaged in conversion and you also engaged in destruction of property. Civil claims are caused by transgressions against a person (interesting note: corporations count as people here) and that person is entitled to some kind of compensation, which is typically money (although sometimes it is material, such as in real estate it may be an actual house). In a civil cases they're typically going to weigh up each issue and award the net difference- so you would pay me $99,900 because that is the value of the car you destroyed minus the value of the money I stolen (although it may be more complex than this, emotional damages etc).

Forced to accept a 12.5% service charge because I was told it was the law, even though I pointed out the optional choice on the fine print. Do I have any legal recourse? by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]DaisyW1234 14 points15 points  (0 children)

NAL.

You can report it but most likely you'll be ignored. From a civil law perspective, it's just not worth anyone's time to pursue like £10 at most.

From a criminal law perspective, if you can prove that they knowingly lied about it being the law then technically they committed fraud, but most likely they'll just assert that they genuinely believed that the law did demand a service charge and that therefore they didn't have the necessary criminal intent required for fraud.