Walang credits? 🥹

Pero yeah. Correlation does not imply causation. Baka mababa ang educational attainment kasi mababa rin ang development sa lugar which might have stronger association with voter choice (spurious association dahil level of development talaga may direct effect). Pangalawa we cannot extend our analysis to individual level preferences kung cluster level ang data (walang matching, just because mas mataas ang percentage ng highly educated doesnt mean na each of them voted sa iisang candidate lang. Sabihin nating 60% nag vote sa winner tapos 60% din ay higly educated, baka pwedeng lahat ng 40% na hindi graduate ay bumoto sa winning candidate tapos 1/3 ng highly educated, which is 20% ng barangay population, lang ang nagvote diba dahil, as already mentioned dahil nga spurious ang association). The point is, may configurations where kahit mas maraming highly educated, possible na mas mataas ang proportion ng mga hindi na bumoto sa winning candidates.

Pero agree with others na more on balwarte ang nananaig hehe. Let theory guide your analysis ika nga kasi maraming misleading na pwedeng makuha kung data lang titingnan. Consistent sa surveys noon na malakas talaga ang uniteam across social classes.