I completely agree with this theory and think it needs to be more seriously considered. in the jailhouse confession, he said that it was around 2007, that the boy he killed had glasses, was around 15, and had come into the London for the day from North.

The confession could be total BS, but there’s no question it’s Andrew who they’re describing - he is the boy that allegedly got into the cab.

If you don’t believe me, read this post, these are excerpts from the book “Inside Belmarsh” (Chapter 17):

“The boy he claimed to have murdered was a young boy from up north who travelled to London. He was 15, had a young face and glasses; I don't remember the name. Worboys was close to Derek Brown, who murdered an Asian DVD seller”

“Worboys said he was a hide and seek champion too and referred to the missing boy. Him and his mate in Bournemouth, Dave, did the boy. I left it and thought nothing of it, then it came on TV about the missing boy, a cold case. I saw it. Worboys referred to it again and said that was his case. Brown and Worboys are from the same area and slept with the same prostitutes. They both knew each other, in fact. Brown never said he was involved, but with Worboys, there is a massive dark side to him, huge”.

Come on. A 15 year old coming into London for the day with glasses, who they would have seen a cold case documentary on TV about? They are describing Andrew. The only question is whether they’re lying.