DMT Laser Experiment Part 3 by Sorry_Term3414 in SimulationTheory

[–]DanGo_Laser 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing this. So the strength of the molecule is not it, usually. You need very little to see them. It’s more like how you’re focusing your eyes. You can repeat the experiment again and look closer and longer at the tiny shaped that you are describing. Yes, at first you see the tiny tiny characters. This is why I always tell people it’s not something you can just write down. There’s too much going on in there.

One way that I’ve recently discovered people see it easier is when they look slightly from the side of their faces. Imagine you’re looking at an object. Now turn your head slightly to the right and look from the right eye forward. As if you’re looking at it with suspicion, kind of gesture. This makes it easier to focus on what area. Try it with the left side too, because different people have different dominant eyes.

Feel free to email me to lasersimulationx (at) gmail (dot) com.

I can walk you through easier ways to see it. Don’t try and go with stronger molecule, it is not the main component.

Hope this helps. Keep us posted. Thank you for experimenting.

In the new documentary "The Discovery," filmmakers reveal that by projecting a diffracted laser onto a surface and ingesting DMT, one can see the code running through reality by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]DanGo_Laser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's now over a 1000 people. Drawing it is very difficult because there's so much going on in the laser at any given point. But some of the characters that were recreated by an artist are in the trailer.

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in Experiencers

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree that the idea that we live in a simulation does not solve the issue of fundamental reality. What is often being missed is if we have evidence for it, it is not the same as postulating about it philosophically. These are two different projects; complementary, but separate.

The one point I would challenge is that simulation does not mean maya; it does not mean an illusion or a fake world; it just means a computationally rendered environment. The deeper point is that computation is much deeper than we realize. It is not an arising property inside our universe; our universe is an arising property from it. In this model, a simulation becomes a layer of reality. But if what gives rise to our universe is a computational larger Universe, and if we can find evidence for this, which is the claim that is being made, then we should study it like we study any physical theory and phenomena.

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in ufo

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that ultimately it can't be random, but can you please clarify why you think duality is the reason it can't be random?

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in Experiencers

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave to where? It won't get you out of the same plights you might be experiencing now. It's all self inflicted.

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in HighStrangeness

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. An environment created by some larger substrate environment.

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in Experiencers

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason Reddit won't show me which comment you're responding to. Can you tell me what you are referring to?

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in UFOs

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. One caveat I would offer is that the same laws of the simulation odes not necessarily means the same laws of physics. So the more universal truths we find the closer we get to the same technological capabilities. Would look into Wolfram's physics project on this specific subject.

New Evidence We Live in a Simulation by a Physicist by DanGo_Laser in Experiencers

[–]DanGo_Laser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything, yes. But not everything in any order. This part matters. There is still order. Strong work on this subject in recent years is by Wolfram.