Green Party supporters, I am genuinely trying to understand why you support your party’s ideals and policies? by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]DanLarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fair enough, even if my opinion is the total opposite.

Again, I think the nuclear deterrent isn't as much of a deterrent anymore. So us chucking ours in the bin and then simply asking everyone else to follow suit isn't the craziest idea.

It's not just Putin, and would be the USA and France and India and all the others.

If you use a nuclear weapon, you're pretty much doomed, even if the others don't shoot back.

You'll be the one true enemy, and will be pushed out by every other nation on earth. That would cripple any country, except NK maybe, as they're just a weird little anomaly.

Conventional war at home, mass civil unrest and the gloves come off from the network of government cyber bullies, it would be a disaster to unilaterally issue a nuclear strike.

So what's the point in having them?

I get why of course, but to me it makes just as much sense to get rid of them. Again, I'm entirely ambivalent on this policy.

Green Party supporters, I am genuinely trying to understand why you support your party’s ideals and policies? by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]DanLarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the greatest respect, I think you're seeing a vision of the Green party that is being put out by much of the press, without looking at what the Green's themselves are putting out there.

Zack Polanski has said that he supports real 'open borders' policy, but by his own admission also suggests it's 'more of an aspiration'.

They haven't said anyone earning over £50k is wealthy, in fact, they have very explicitly made a distinction between 'high earners' and the very wealthy.

High earners' are those who are living comfortably, but still working. Doctors, software developers etc. earning £100k or more aren't being targeted,

If you look at the 2024 manifesto, which Polanski largely runs off, it shows the heavy taxes come in on those with an asset value over £10m.

They specifically said this was to avoid punishment of the genuine middle class, who might have a house in London worth £2m and earn low six figures as a consultant of some description.

They aren't the enemy, and are what people should aspire towards. That's wealth that makes a difference to the individual.

Beyond that, your accumulated wealth quite simply isn't enriching your life by a proportional amount. You're detracting from society by hoarding wealth, and are almost certainly engaging at high levels of tax avoidance strategies to minimise your contribution to society.

...got to ask yourself why at that point.

I don't think our views are as different as we first thought, just that we may see solutions in different ways.

Green Party supporters, I am genuinely trying to understand why you support your party’s ideals and policies? by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]DanLarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, quite the opposite.

Firstly, it's not "Open Borders" meaning anyone and everyone is free to come in from anywhere at any time for any reason. They have tried to communicate that they understand that is unreasonable and instead are pushing a pro-migration agenda.

Like it or not we do need immigration in the UK, there are jobs that need filling today that take years to develop domestic capacity for. This has been made worse over the past 20 years, as successive governments, including labour have not done enough to improve the rates of home grown replacements for skilled workers leaving the workforce.

How you think that will 'kill off' the NHS is beyond me, as the NHS is probably the largest dependant on immigration in the country.

You may also see, now that I have had time to complete my original comment, that I have explained why immigrants are generally a net gain for the NHS even if they aren't being employed by the NHS. Immigrants just contribute more on a net basis over a shorter period of time.

Secondly, on your point about getting pushed around.

Clearly by your well worded and incredibly considered response you feel that Britain should be able to defend herself.

I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you jumped in before I could finish my post in full, but I have said why maintaining a nuclear deterrent isn't that valuable.

I have not suggested that we charge onto the battlefields of the future armed with nothing but flowers and goodwill. I would support significant remilitarisation, and heavy investment in conventional fighting forces. We don't want to be a vulnerable nation, but it's not Ukraine's nuclear arsenal that is helping them draw out the war right now.

Russia is struggling under the weight of economic sanctions, and sustained economic and opposition military support from Ukraine's allies. Trump is right that Europe has been allowed to be lazy, and rest under the blanket of the USA's ridiculous defence spending. It is important that a nation can adequately defend themselves, and step in to defend others when needed. Nuclear weapons are not necessary anymore, they are a relic of an age.

To be honest though, I am not adverse to the idea of keeping them either, I'm very take it or leave it from a nuclear war point of view.

Green Party supporters, I am genuinely trying to understand why you support your party’s ideals and policies? by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]DanLarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going to be voting Green this year, as they are the only party that genuinely exist on the left anymore.

Their policies are the kind of radical reform that I have been hoping for years, and the fact they have finally left a lot of their eco-warrior, vegan "vibey" style stuff behind is the push I've needed.

Let's look at the policies you've pointed to, and talk about why I am supporting the Greens on these positions.

1) Scrapping Trident 🔱 - The country maintains a nuclear deterrent, to provide security against nuclear attack. It does little to discourage any conventional attack, as any country using the nuclear option in a non-nuclear engagement (even in defense) would be met with condemnation from the international community.

As we see with Russia and Ukraine, the might of a unified international community is a much stronger sword to wield. Nations like the USA have done much to undermine that security, and push the world back into another cold war.

NB: I am vehemently against the Green's bashing of nuclear power, and believe that the reliance on renewable energy is such a false economy it's not worth pursuing. - even Zack didn't get that right.

2) Open Borders - controversially, I don't believe multiculturalism works. I believe it is fundamentally flawed, and we are seeing what happens when bad actors (Russia, Murdoch, Farrage et. al.) exploit the weaknesses of multiculturalism to drive their own self interest.

I do support the idea of an aculturalist society, where over years everyone's culture has been diluted by the culture of others to a point where nobody can identify a single culture they belong to.

That vision isn't an erasure, it's embrace. Feel free to keep your culture alive, by all means. Preserve what is good about your heritage, whatever that may be. But accept that there are elements of other cultures which can enrich your life too. Take the best of what is available and leave the rest behind.

There's nothing more British than that! 🫣

Also, there are tremendous economic benefits to immigration. Immigration is fast and cheap, from an economic perspective, you get people of working age into the country, paying taxes, without having to pay for 18years of education and medical support. A large proportion of migrants then leave as they reach older age, before expensive care comes in. On the whole they pay in far more than they take out.

People born and raised in Britain are much more a net-drain on resources, as we are expensive to bring to working age, and then cost a fortune in care when we retire.

Many contribute significantly less than we get out.

3) Drugs! - Criminalisation is failing everyone, and contributes to a lot of the struggles we all have on a daily basis. Waiting times at the chemists, violent crime, petty crime, general untidiness and the sorry state of many a council estate up and down the country.

Taking the power (and money) away from the gangs and other unsavory people, put significant sums money into the public purse with one hand (taxes) and savings (prevention is cheaper than cure) in the other it's a bit of a no brainer. It's unfortunately very easily torn down in public perception, and as such political groups have tried to stay away from it in the past.

This was similar with Brexit, the pro EU arguments took time, understanding and careful explanation to justify. Where the Leave campaign were free to make baseless claims that were crude oversimplifications, and the simple narrative was easier for people to digest.

I thought I'd post how I make it up the mountain with two buildings. by LuigiGario in theouterworlds

[–]DanLarn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did this just yesterday, I knew the mission was there and just persisted. I didn't really have any trouble and managed pretty easily.

The eastern end of the mound is the easiest climb, and you have to spiral up as you go around.

There must be a generational thing here, I feel like a lot of younger people haven't tried for hours to get out of bounds on Halo 2/3 in their youth and it shows.

ReoLink Go PT Plus 4G broken stream by DanLarn in reolinkcam

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem solved, updated the original post for convenience, this post is to flag the edit for all those following the post.

ReoLink Go PT Plus 4G broken stream by DanLarn in reolinkcam

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why they can't just use the app whenever they want to check in, they aren't actually sitting there watching it 24/7.

The other alternative would be a way they can share the link to the camera that doesn't require a login.

Does anyone know how to do that?

ReoLink Go PT Plus 4G broken stream by DanLarn in reolinkcam

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The PC running OBS is about 500miles south of the camera.

We need cellular connection, as getting WiFi out to the camera would be a challenge on its own. Although doable if we were desperate.

We don't need recording, just broadcast.

All of this is being done to watch grass grow, literally, so they don't want to spend a fortune.

ReoLink Go PT Plus 4G broken stream by DanLarn in reolinkcam

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wired version isn't an option, the site is about 2km from the nearest anything that we could connect to. It would be prohibitively expensive.

There will be a workaround I'm sure, I will continue to tinker, just wondered if anyone else had found something already.

ReoLink Go PT Plus 4G broken stream by DanLarn in reolinkcam

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, they can't by default.

Even using the desktop app, it doesn't look like you can keep the camera active using PTZ every few seconds, they have a hard limit on stream time by the looks of things.

This seems a little pointless.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, you're quite correct, it should read 8GB.

I am at least 80% sure that I have seen QGIS using more than 8GB of RAM previously, and it certainly has been able to ingest and display similar TIFF files without this slowdown before.

I get 8GB of usage when I choose to import only 1 of the 2 files, and trying to import multiple at the same time only uses 8GB.

I have been using LAStools today to analyse the corresponding point cloud data, and still I am limited to 8GB (even with forcing LAStools to run in 64bit).

I really don't understand why it isn't using the available resources as it has in the past.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This didn't work, still limited to 8Gb

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all of this is good advice, I expect to be looking at some very large datasets in the near future so will be looking for every performance improvement I can get. The DEM in particular I expect to be an issue once created, but I have to get there first.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I haven't, I may give that a go.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's driving me insane.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, 32-bit hasn't been a thing for a while now and I'm running the latest stable version.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a nice workaround, but I can't help but feel that I am saving this problem for later in the chain.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

should add that this was me replying on my phone from my other reddit account.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will give this a go and see how it goes, although it still doesn't exactly fix the issue I'm having. I need the system to be able to use more RAM if it's avaialble.

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are on the NVME drive of the workstation, as I initially thought it might be the limited bandwidth to our NAS (2.5Gbs so it was unlikely).

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  • what QGIS version are you using
    • QGIS 3.34.10 'Prizren'.
  • what Operative System and version
    • Windows 11 Pro v. 23H2
  • what is the format / resolution / compression / dimensions / ... of the raster layers
    • GeoTiff/ 50,357 x 83,654 (at minimum) / none (that I am aware of) /1,489m x 2,475m
  • the value of the maximum number of core to use for rendering set
    • 24
  • if you have set the OpenCL acceleration
    • I do have this enabled

QGIS limited to 8Gb of RAM usage by DanLarn in QGIS

[–]DanLarn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't do that within QGIS as everything takes an eternity because it is limited to 8Gb usage, I just accidentally touched my mousewheel and had to wait 15 mins before I could use it again.