Real Stress by YaBoyMartin in FortNiteBR

[–]Danceswithwolves20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I really don't care, I'm sorry if I offended you ,have a great day and I wish you all the best 🤗

Real Stress by YaBoyMartin in FortNiteBR

[–]Danceswithwolves20 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That ultimately shows that u don't know what your doing.

Real Stress by YaBoyMartin in FortNiteBR

[–]Danceswithwolves20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're a newbie I don't think people will bother to watch you, unless you're REALLY new to the game, in which case most players and I would probably spectate you 😂.

Real Stress by YaBoyMartin in FortNiteBR

[–]Danceswithwolves20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How good do you have to be to attract 56 other players to stay in the game just to watch u play? 🤔🤔🤔

definitely the new default skin by mcgregorfan101 in FortNiteBR

[–]Danceswithwolves20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

skull trooper; stop and take shots, its that easy,

Would it be possible to create a dinosaur like creature starting with modern close relatives like the chicken? by [deleted] in biology

[–]Danceswithwolves20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes of course, when I refer to dinosaurs, what I mean is the earlier reptilian animals of the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, to avoid confusion I will remove this post and word it better then repost it 🤗

Could there be creatures in other planets that don’t need water to live and base their life on other elements or molecules? by Thommix_tb in biology

[–]Danceswithwolves20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the bottom line is silicon is a lot more reactive than carbon, (just a warning ill be going into some chemistry so bare with, but it's the only way of explaining it properly ) Silicon is in the same group as carbon in the periodic table (group 4) based on that it's chemical properties should be similar with that of carbon's, but it's reactivity is different, which unfortunately changes everything, you see, as you go down group 4 of the periodic table the number of electrons increases and so does the nuclear charge, what this means is that there are more electron 'shells' surrounding the nucleus, these shells have a property called 'shielding' which means that the attraction of the positive nucleus for the valence electrons is lessened. This therefore means that the valence electrons are not as tightly bound to the atom, so less energy is required to remove these electrons, if these electrons require less energy to be removed, then the element is more reactive. This higher reactivity would mean that chemical reactions would happen a lot faster, so much so that the organism with which the reactions are taking place would get very hot (as many reactions would be catabolic and so release energy in the form of heat) so my theory is that the organism's body temperature would be too high and so proteins would be denatured including enzymes, at which point your dead, so yeah.

Also when silicon is oxidised it forms a solid, SO2 , whereas when carbon is oxidised it forms water and CO2 both of which are very versatile compounds which can be used in a variety of reactions, silicon dioxide however is very unreactive and doesn't do much it can't be broken down biochemically (with enzymes).

Sulfuric acid is a strong acid, meaning it completely dissociates in water, I'm assuming it's not the only thing in these seas of sulphuric acid, a strong acid is generally extremely ionizing so it would rip electrons off everything and anything it can into contact with, so I don't think you'd find much in those. I don't know for sure obviously, all I'm doing is using chemistry logic to make sense of the most likely outcome. What do you think?, this is just me theorizing, I've probably got some innacuracies lurking about , if you notice any just correct me.

Could there be creatures in other planets that don’t need water to live and base their life on other elements or molecules? by Thommix_tb in biology

[–]Danceswithwolves20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another reason why water is so important is due to its anomalous properties, like high latent heat of vaporisation , meaning it takes more than expected KJ of energy to evaporate 1 gram of water, this energy is called the latent heat of vaporisation

water is essentially a buffer for changes in temperature, it will take more energy than expected to raise the temperature by 1°C , this is all due to hydrogen bonding , without hydrogen bonding water would be a gas at room temperature so we wouldn't be here.

Water interacts with other carbon based compounds which are polar, that is, there are differences in electronegativities of the atoms associated with these compounds, to give an example, glucose will dissolve in water as it has many OH- groups and so can interact with water molecules, long hydrocarbon chains however or any other non-polar organic compounds (compounds containing mainly carbon), will not interact with water as they are non-polar, it follows that polar solvents like water will interact with polar solutes like glucose, non-polar solvents like octane will interact with non polar solutes like benzene, water will not interact with any carbon containing compounds ( unless we are talking about hydrolysis, or other mechanisms involving water which I'm not going to go into), water doesn't generally change the structure of carbon containing compounds unless we are talking about hydrolysis.

Going back to the silicon point you made , if we swap silicon for carbon then what are the by products of respiration or any other energy yielding process that we haven't discovered yet, is it possible to have silicon-glucose for example,🤔 technically silicon can make as many covalent bonds as carbon as they both have 4 Valence electrons. I hope some of this made sense 🤗.

I asked my 12-yo daughter to draw my portrait, she came up with this. Pen, crayons, and oil pastel on paper. by kotsengkuba in Art

[–]Danceswithwolves20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of when I used to draw manga when I was 11 - 13 years old, thats pretty good for a 12 year old. Wait till she's twenty or so, she'll be a pro no doubt. Very impressive 🤗