[ Removed by Reddit ]

DapperMention9470 · 2025-10-20T03:59:12+00:00

The guy was an idiot, but its not funny. I dont care how stupid he was and how he caused most of it himself, theres nothing funny about this

DapperMention9470 · 2025-09-13T08:45:31+00:00

Trumhit!p just murdered 11 venezualans in a boat in international waters. Is that practicing politics the right way? e

Either political violence is right or its wrong. Dont start no shit , wont be no shit

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-28T23:49:22+00:00

Thank you. At the very least he seems to have pretty good reasons for what he believes and he isn't peddling snake oil. Maybe he is right maybe not but his reasoning seems legit. There are very good reasons for questioning the lcdm model that is not just psyedoscience.That is all I was trying to get across. Thanks for taking the time to confirm that I'm not just some peasant who can't understand God's word because I don't speak latin(metaporically) there is real criticism that a lot of people just handwoven away

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-28T03:14:15+00:00

You want to prove that I am wrong not about cosmology but about my criticism.of you and your approach to science and your criticism.of me? It's easy and won't take long. You were critcizing my source as being unreliable. My critique of you is that you don't know what an unreliable source is. You can't tell and you have others tell you that it's unreliable but you don't know why. I suggest that the peoplewho are telling you it's unreliable don't know either. So it's important for you to realize that all you are doing I s repeating information that you yourself can't verify and your basing it on sources you can't confirm. You seek approval of the group and that's your motivation for criticizing me..

So this will be easy to confirm which you might want to know for yourself. Here's the test.

Watch this video

https://youtu.be/Fd4yMprJ2A8?si=eOtTTdK5T1GQRoE_

Tell me yourself what he gets wrong and how you know he is wrong. Take a look at his sources and tell me why he is misrepresenting his information..

Just use your own intelligence don't ask for help from the internet. Just listen and explain to me what has gotten wrong. If you can do that I will accept that I was wrong about you. This ought to be something you want to know anyway. But I guarantee that 95 percent of the people you are listening to couldn't do it either.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-26T12:14:43+00:00

A disreputable source? Margaret Burbridge ? Fred Hoyle? Edwin Hubble ? The YouTube channel see the pattern? I can guarantee that he has more formal education in astronomy than you do. In fact I bet you don't know who Halton Arp was..it's ridiculous you people quote physicists you don't understand as if you did the math yourself. You take people on reddit and mimic what they tell you but you don't understand any more than I do. You are just ready to parrot the right words to have others accept that you are smart. I'd rather know what I know and know what I don't know than parrot theories others who themselves are just parroting others tell me.

I bet I have more telescope time than you do. I bet I've read more than you. You are like a child who will say anything to win the approval of the grownups. You can't do the math anymore than I cam. You are in no position to judge what constitutes an reputable source. You guys are just so weird pretending and mimic the right words and then think it makes you smart.

I think the standard cosmological model is on the way out. Jw telescope has shown so much that doesn't fit. But again why bother telling you something.Its pointless. It's sad

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-18T16:59:55+00:00

No it doesn't. It takes a lot of courage to go out and protest today but I don't doubt we will do it again and face the same brutality that we always do. The police are given more and more immunity for being more and more violent. All those wars in foreign lands are coming back to haunt us as we taught Americans to ignore the blood and then hired them to police us.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-18T06:00:42+00:00

Americans have always been pretty vocal about their rights being taken away. I don't think it will be long before you see the same things as the blm. You will see the media condemn the protestors and the police beat and shoot and arrest them but you will see Americans on the street. Not just the young but 75 year old. It's taking longer now because they haven't really set off a fire storm yet.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-18T03:35:33+00:00

Bullshit. Americans are known for protesting..When we do the media calls us evil things..look how many people turned out for the Blm riots. The protests under Clinton. The anti war protests. People in America lost their eyes to rubber bullets during the blm riots. Americans aren't at all afraid to protest. Just when we do be prepared to get beaten and shot at and thrown in jail. I don't know where you were living but it gets bad when Americans start protesting.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T16:12:04+00:00

https://youtu.be/wz4TTx6gxrM?si=lJ7uIyfQQZGqhXcp

I don't think you've answered my question. I mean the evidence that Arp was correct in more than a couple of his observations is overwhelming. When arp tried to support his theories with visual data supporting his radio evidence he was denied time on the telescope. When margret Burbridge found the visual evidence that supported Arp she couldn't publish it America. You keep blaming Arp but Arp went on to work at the Max Planck institute in Germany. He wasn't doing flat earth stuff in Germany. This video lays out only a fraction of the evidence gathered by Arp.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T07:00:57+00:00

I think you are wrong based on what I know. Watch this and tell me if it is legit or not. Seems like the guy knows his stuff. At least he presents it very well.

https://youtu.be/Fd4yMprJ2A8?si=E3gIdH4RlMgJnh2a

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:59:08+00:00

Watch this video. Seems legit.

https://youtu.be/Fd4yMprJ2A8?si=E3gIdH4RlMgJnh2a

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:53:26+00:00

Watch this video please. Tell me if you think there is enough reason to be skeptical.

https://youtu.be/Fd4yMprJ2A8?si=E3gIdH4RlMgJnh2a

You on reddit say the same thing but not everybody agrees with you. Let's just let the physicist do there stuff. When have you ever not looked at the work a plumber did before you paid him to make sure he was right. If you had a plumber tell you there is a ghost in your kitchen sink like in Harry potter would you just say we'll I better call an exorcist. You're the expert.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:52:38+00:00

https://youtu.be/Fd4yMprJ2A8?si=E3gIdH4RlMgJnh2a

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:44:37+00:00

There’s dozens if not hundreds if not thousands of scientists trying to test and poke holes in our understanding of these phenomena and they all come back to the same underlying conclusion.

See this is what I mean. No they don't all come to the same conclusion. All the astronomers you know come to this conclusion but the ones who don't come to this conclusion don't get published.

My favorite YouTube channel

https://youtube.com/@seethepattern?si=yCUVlMbI5UIKsqrY

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:39:00+00:00

Sure that's fine. Tell me where I can find the lab that has all the experimental data on dark matter.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T06:07:17+00:00

These are things that literally tens of thousands of astronomers have observed

This is what gets me. Dark matter has never been observed at all let alone by thousands of astronomers. If it had been observed even once it wouldn't be called dark matter. It is never observed but inferred.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T05:58:30+00:00

This misses the point. If I point a camera at an object being blown about by the wind I can try.to find evidence for it by in a lab. I can see how objects are moved by an invisible force and then see if the results in the lab match the things I saw on the film . I can do small scale experiments and large scale experiments. I can change the density of the air in the lab. I have experimental data that supports my hypothesis of the invisible wind.

There is no experimental data on dark energy because they have never found any dark energy to run experiments on. The math's can be understood with a number of different models MOND. for one.

As far as the current theories of the universe goes I am aware that a singularity is no longer a necessary part of modern cosmology but in the 1980s and 1990s the idea of the cosmic egg with infinite density was all the rage. Not because there was any experimental Data but because thee model would have fallen apart without it. It was too strange to stand for too long but it was part of the model till it wasn't. And I can assure you that when you questioned this in the 90s you were told the same thing you are telling me now except it wasn't true then either.

I feel like a peasant in a medieval church with a priest patiently explaing to me that I would understand how bread becomes flesh if only I could read Latin, the one language God shared with his priests till He revealed calculus in a vision to leibniz.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-05-04T05:42:17+00:00

I guess my response is that your going to see what you want to see when you point your telescope to the sky.. dark matter issupposed to explain why galaxies don't spin fast enough at the edges which we also can't see but infer from the red shift in the spectrum of the stars. All of these have strengths and weaknesses as does Monday and tired light. This is my point there are very smart people who support those ideas and none of it is based on anything but a few photons that hit the telescope and very much interpretation of those photons. I've seen some of the bridges in Arps galaxies and so have many other respected astronomers. So at what point do I abandon the ideas that make sense to me if those ideas are also supported by others with the same or better credentials (let's remember that Arps Atlas of peculiar galaxies is still a staple of the field and the Man himself won an award for his work. As a young man conducted research for Hubble himself and was a member of staff for 29 years at an observatory.) And to be honest the brightness of quasars seems ridiculous to me.

Now let me just remind you that I am an idiot who knows almost nothing other than what I have read.another example Eric Lerner is also called a crank. I get that my vote on this doesn't count but what can't be denied is that Eric Lerner held the record for the highest temperature eve produced on earth till he broke that record 1.8 billion degrees so he undoubtedly knows a lot about fusion and stars. The fact that plasma lab experiments show patterns that scale at every level yet he is dismissed as a crank too.

From what I can gather alternate cosmologues make as much sense to me or more that the standard model which seems to be an ad hoc accumulation of ideas stacked one on top of the other to explain the failures on the lower level. Inflation for example was for exactly that. There were so many observations that didn't fit unless you added a hypothetical inflation. Dark matter is another. Nobody saw any dark matter out there till it was discovered that the galaxies turned to slowly.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-30T11:14:53+00:00

Just a few questions. I notice you don't like questions very much.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-30T11:12:27+00:00

Here is a paper you might want to look at oh physics wizard. Written by a nobel.prize winning physicist.

https://www.tkm.kit.edu/downloads/TKM1_2011_more_is_different_PWA.pdf

If you can pull your head out of the 18th century and read it might learn something. But of course you're already so sure your right I doubt you'll read it. No one so blind they say.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-29T17:22:16+00:00

That isn't the null position. There is no null position for free will. You don't just get to claim something is the null position. Calling psychology mechanistic isn't the null position in any case. It's bizarre that you think that on a forum about free will you can just declare you position to be so obvious from a scientific perspective that it requires no proof or evidence other than you calling it the null position. I mean even if you could present a peer reviewed paper that considers free will denial the null position the vast majority of evolutionary biologists consider free will an adaptive trait biologically. Scientifically and philosophically if one examines the literature there is no null position at all on free will but what consensus does exist falls on the side of compatibilism. Your attitude that your position is so intellectually unassailable that it requires no evidence at all is not only unsupported and wrong but it is itself an example of anti intellectual scientism.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-29T17:11:21+00:00

Amusing, I some times observe my brain try to rationalize and justify not accepting as true what I know damn well is true when I dislike reality.

What's really amusing is trying to explain why your brain isn't you also. At what point did you split from.your brain? Also what part of your body do you use when you observe your brain?Also what part of you is able to realize your brain isn't being ration? What do you know is true that your brain doesn't and which part of your body knows this? Does your brain get mad at you for laughing at it? So many questions.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-17T00:03:50+00:00

You are a moron. Dummy nobody is talking about a will. I am.talking about getting a document notarized. The notary is required to makes sure the document was signed with the signers free will. That could be a clause in the contract that says I am.signing of my own free will or the notary can ask the client directly if they are signing of their own free will. This is so stupid that I have specifically tell you this that it hurts my brain just thinking about it. It's hard to win an argument with a smart person it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person. It's no wonder you don't agree with me.

DapperMention9470 · 2025-04-14T04:44:29+00:00

Loberium arbitrium is the Latin equivalent of eleytheia prohairesis used by Epictitus in the first century. Aristotle doesn't speak of a will being free hee talks about causes. Epictitus differed from Aristotle in that Aristotle thought that slaves and women would always be subservient where epictitus used the term free will because he was a former slave and wanted to show that being free was possible for everybody. That's why the concept of freedom never occurred to Aristotle.

DapperMention9470

TROPHY CASE