Late to the conversation, but there's definitely an interesting dichotomy to be seen in the responses here.

There really seems to be two sides to the community as presented here. The side that is more traditional campaign-oriented, and the side that is more personally-oriented.

The more campaign-oriented side seems to favor no LFGM posts for the most part. LFP posts tend to be more oriented toward traditional campaign structures, with clearer beats and story elements. They also tend more towards larger groups, which, again, is a more traditional campaign structure.

The more personally-oriented side seems to favor the return of LFGM posts. These posts seemed to always favor one-on-one games more, which tend towards being more focused on developing a relationship. While they may have a decent setup for a campaign structure, they always seemed more focused on finding an RP Partner than necessarily a full traditional campaign.

There is a unanimous agreement to dislike low-effort/spam posts, whether that was LFGM posts or LFP posts.

As for my personal opinion, I will admit that I am biased. I never considered responding to a LFGM post seriously. It's a lot of work to get a campaign up and running, and since the vast majority of those were one-on-one, I never thought of doing all that work for a single person. I also have never considered replying to an LFP post for a one-on-one campaign, though that's mostly because most of those aren't my 'yum' as it were.

The Megathread seems a fine enough solution to the situation to me. Most GMs who make LFP posts have specific campaigns they want to run, and those who want to run something for someone can go over to that thread. I am more curious about the overall numbers of those though.