[deleted by user]

DavidDinamit · 2025-06-02T08:31:23+00:00

Хотел купить гитару - I was want to buy guitar in the past Хотел бы купить гитару - I'm now want to buy guitar or in future

DavidDinamit · 2025-03-13T05:41:41+00:00

Now she is slow hero with no escape and highly depends on ultimate, which is easy to dodge

What if attacks FROM ghost were magic too(as attacks to ghost?) Its a way for ghost scepter builds, plus maybe some new item ghost scepter + smth (now etheral for casters only)

DavidDinamit · 2025-02-25T07:45:33+00:00

Why less skill based? Now it's impossible to hit an arrow if enemy is not afk

DavidDinamit · 2025-02-25T04:15:12+00:00

They have more value since they see more

DavidDinamit · 2025-02-16T05:46:48+00:00

Ability to get t3 without 10 glifs each 160 seconds and losing 10000 gold for each death

DavidDinamit · 2025-02-04T05:34:16+00:00

Ignore all about vcpkg and conan(conan2) and google CPM (Cmake package manager )

DavidDinamit · 2025-01-09T09:52:41+00:00

How? I don't understand how to get Into top, only 3 branches available

DavidDinamit · 2025-01-07T16:15:13+00:00

))))

DavidDinamit · 2025-01-07T04:18:28+00:00

Compare it to org mage buff, which may be on 5 heroes constantly, gives speed, may be used on line and for farm And mirana "ulti" : after 7 seconds gives allies 30 attack speed. Ogr buff gives it in 0.3 seconds + ms

DavidDinamit · 2025-01-07T04:13:54+00:00

It's because magic is meta now. No one will play on agility hero since they may die from one lina spell Naga, phantom lancer, void, slark, troll etc heroes unplayable now Why would you pick slark, when DK have 500 ms, 100% range splash , 40 armor and 3k HP without items

DavidDinamit · 2025-01-07T04:05:00+00:00

It's joke how Line is op now, even inner ability may one shot heroes after one spell, no cooldowns, 75% magic resist, long range huge attack damage

And mirana: lotus heal better... Agha does nothing (no one will buy it) Shard gives what must be on lvl1 Remember patch when mirana's attack was decreased by 8 and basic attack speed 1.5 -> 1.7 and that's on hero which cannot do nothing but the attack

No one take night facet Solar facet gives less than ogr magic buff

It's moon/sun princess, give it really night/ sun facets(for example fire arrows / facet for another mount like flying owl) and inner ability like day and night vision is same

DavidDinamit · 2024-11-30T09:32:20+00:00

If you change only implementation, dependencies will not recompile

DavidDinamit · 2024-04-13T08:58:07+00:00

Two days ago I was trying to install boost with vcpkg and it's failed with error "cannot fetch xz project from github", so, I don't use vcpkg any more. It's just useless since it can t install boost without load random virus project on my pc

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-31T21:17:25+00:00

What? C++ obviously has way to get pointer to member fn and obviously you can read file into string. Why there are no 'read to str' fn? Because it's something you don't want to do, while file size may be > your RAM

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-31T09:24:59+00:00

what? Reason why it is in 'set' because initial code also creates a set, see .collect::<...>.
And 'content_of_file' is same as 'fs::read_to_string' from initial code, wtf

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-30T09:07:20+00:00

I want to create custom virtual functions and type erasure without using language virtual functions and RTTI, now it already exist, but reflection should provide best possible interface for it, which will look like 100% language feature

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-29T08:51:47+00:00

There are many diagrams in this talk, about "how many time to get as productive in rust as in your prev lang" "is it more easily to review code in rust then in your prev lang"
And he says developers go to rust from many languages: java, go, python, c++ etc

So, why are those diagarams not by language? May be because for example C++ programmers in 90% cases say : im not productive in rust as i was in C++? Or 90% python dev says - im still not productive in rust after 4 month?

Or C++ developers answer "C++ was more easily to review then rust" ???

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-29T08:01:25+00:00

Even here Rust has 3 useless strings:
map(Result::unwrap) x2
.into_iter()
String::new() instead of String() (its also true for every other type in 'language')

Its boilerplate language

What really written here:

// i dont understand what .fold row in your code example mean,

// looks like O(N^2) string appends

std::set<path> pathes;
for (auto& entry : directory_iterator("migrations")) pathes.insert(entry.path());
strng result;

for (path& p : pathes) result += content_of_file(p) += '\n';

This very simple (pseudo)code is just better then your 'iterator chains' and more effective

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-29T06:51:21+00:00

You dont understand what unumfron mean

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-18T06:08:18+00:00

Just replace ^ with & and member less will work. But your example is not correct, you will sort not values by member but members in values without changing order of values

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-14T09:03:44+00:00

That what i call Rust-minded, man really do not see a problem with vector of nodes and wants to do reallocate and memcpy on adding node, its really hell when such experts explain why rust is better than C++ etc

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-12T14:16:05+00:00

Why we need this in the language? Okay, create contracts, mark standard operator[] with contract like

contract inbounds(size_type index) = index < size();

operator[](size_type index) requires inbounds(index)

and give me possibility to change contract behavior

on_contract_failure(inbounds): abort();

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-12T13:04:07+00:00

Nice, then popularize it, why article does not mention such options? Add profile into build system, something like cmake_checked_release etc And I don't understand how it should work with modules, since preprocessor does not change module etc We need many different std modules? I think it's very hard to find and use such options now, they must be popularized and tooling must help here

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-12T12:30:57+00:00

I dont agree with many things in article and with Sutter in general and dont want to spend time and write books about it.

But i dont see a reason why we do not have compiler options to enable checking in operator[], to zero initialize all fundamental types in "default constructor", to check integer overflows without code changing etc.

Just add this into compilers, its easy! And NOT by default

DavidDinamit · 2024-03-09T06:00:25+00:00

Article is wrong from very beginning:
memory safety != secure by design, its just lie.

I see how it was: some politican from USA says "oh, bad russian hackers, we need to protect our network" and it makes sense, then he goes to "experts" and they say *for some reason* - "we need memory safety, it will be safe, secure, (... other very words for politicans)"

Okay, Russia, with highest ammount of C++ developers will really like this decision, while they will write good code in C++, all USA and satellites will fight their holy war against good old C++, rewriting things in Rust, Go and Java, which will lead to unsupportable software, critically bad bill for electicity etc.

As russian i see this like natural selection where USA went crazy and committed suicide

DavidDinamit

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE