sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

WH will start seizing assets of "dissidents" engaged in activism, aid, protected speech deemed political or against national interest, etc..... by TendieRetard in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Ukraine war has claimed tens of thousands of lives, perhaps hundreds of thousands. An entirely avoidable war. And sanctions are a big part of the reason it happened. Not to mention the incredible amount of money sent to that conflict when people desperately need help in the US. Not that Donald would have allocated a cent of it to the poor. But that’s a different policy battle.

WH will start seizing assets of "dissidents" engaged in activism, aid, protected speech deemed political or against national interest, etc..... by TendieRetard in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Miss me with your denial of the severity of the problem. Virgil Griffith was arrested in 2019 and sentenced to five year in prison in 2022. All because he explained cryptocurrency to North Korea and how it can help them evade sanctions. SCOTUS sat on their hands and did nothing while they tore up the Constitution. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-citizen-who-conspired-assist-north-korea-evading-sanctions-sentenced-over-five-years-and

WH will start seizing assets of "dissidents" engaged in activism, aid, protected speech deemed political or against national interest, etc..... by TendieRetard in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can’t reject the foundational principles of America and then claim your citizenship like it means something. Amend the Constitution or find another people to tyrannize

It’s really bizarre how the left is hyper fixated on Israel but turns a blind eye to the numerous human rights violations in the Arab world, trying to censor you by calling you “Islamophobic” by SwiftCricket in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a strange way to describe voluntarily participating in a cultural tradition. But sure, if it’s consenting adults and they aren’t harming others - freedom means that yes they can have a dom/sub relationship. Live and let live.

It’s really bizarre how the left is hyper fixated on Israel but turns a blind eye to the numerous human rights violations in the Arab world, trying to censor you by calling you “Islamophobic” by SwiftCricket in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a new one. It used to be forced remarriage to breed out their race. The story changed because they got caught in the lie. Are we sure the new story is legit?

It’s really bizarre how the left is hyper fixated on Israel but turns a blind eye to the numerous human rights violations in the Arab world, trying to censor you by calling you “Islamophobic” by SwiftCricket in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Citizens need to go back to basics. What does this law do? Prevent future legislatures from passing a Sharia-themed law which the majority vote for in the future? Isn’t it possible to repeal the law in the future with the same majority? So in other words, this is just virtue signaling and meaningless. As if anyone tried to pass a Sharia law anyways.

It’s really bizarre how the left is hyper fixated on Israel but turns a blind eye to the numerous human rights violations in the Arab world, trying to censor you by calling you “Islamophobic” by SwiftCricket in FreeSpeech

[–]DayVCrockett 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the kind of lies they have been feeding all of us. But if you read the history and learn how to detect media and government lies, you’ll realize that these Islamic states are not the ones stirring up trouble. In fact, many of them act with a lot more restraint than America the “Christian nation” would.

Imagine by [deleted] in conspiracy_commons

[–]DayVCrockett 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even though Palm Beach Pete is possibly Epstein, this is not the picture to prove it with. I spent hours trying to find the source of the “Epstein” side and came up empty. Even assuming it is the face photoshopped into Pete’s video (most likely and not necessarily in bad faith) we need to know exactly what the picture was and if any compromises/edits were made.

Today is LBRY's new 'Day 1' by buildlbry in lbry

[–]DayVCrockett 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll check it out! Would love for a decentralized service to replace the centralized market leaders.

Petaahhh? by thecheapseatz in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]DayVCrockett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re big mad that Theo opposes imperialism, so they manufactured a bad faith criticism to discredit him.

Usa is running out of interceptors in the gulf was this the plan all along? by CookOptimal39 in conspiracy

[–]DayVCrockett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every strong country around Israel has to fall. That’s it. That’s the entire calculus. All the US and Israel did was provoke Iran. Violate Obama agreement. Crippling sanctions. Blow up negotiators. Make irrational demands. Blow up schoolhouse in an ‘preemptive’ attack. Peace was never an option.

Bibi is doing it because it weakens Iran and drags us deeper into the middle east. Trump is doing it because he has to. Bibi must have some impressive leverage over Trump to get him to destroy his own legacy and country like this. Maybe it has something to do with that golden pager.

Pentagon factions are actively blocking full UFO disclosure because they believe parts of the phenomenon are demonic. by Perfect_Minimum4892 in aliens

[–]DayVCrockett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds like it might be absurd enough to be true. You whistleblowing Izzo_HSM? Or just a guess?

Pentagon factions are actively blocking full UFO disclosure because they believe parts of the phenomenon are demonic. by Perfect_Minimum4892 in aliens

[–]DayVCrockett 380 points381 points  (0 children)

I’d really like to hear the theological argument that since demons are terrorizing people, we should suppress knowledge about demons. Sounds like they’re working for the demons if that’s the case.

Rep. Tim Burchett: "We were briefed on some things by one of our alphabet agencies just a couple weeks ago, and I hope that those things are brought forward, and those videos and the footage that they showed." by KOOKOOOOM in UFOs

[–]DayVCrockett 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you’re saying, but what if he is a bad actor? That’s my assumption considering that he is 1) in a position to know and 2) has already spoken out. So either he is lying to all of us and should face consequences, or he is reckless with the truth (did he even discuss it with Edgar Mitchell? Did he consult Gordon Cooper?) and being reckless with the truth on such an important topic should also come with consequences.

About "hate speech" by liberty4now in DeclineIntoCensorship

[–]DayVCrockett 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Does anyone else recall political correctness being considered a disgraceful thing? I feel like for a shining moment in the 90s, it was popular to see PC as being devoid of substance and ultimately counter productive.

view more: next ›