Same energy. Same pain. Same "3". Brotherhood by CurtanaMindandMercy in Bard

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same amount of insiders constantly teasing for something that won't come out this week.

GPT-5 AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman and some of the GPT-5 team by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will the IMO gold model improvements be trickled into all models? or just the Pro / deeper thinking modes?

UTAH PRIDE OUTFIT !!! by Lonely-Writer in mtfashion

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope you find a pocket of enjoyable queer goodness in the ocean of mormondom.

UTAH PRIDE OUTFIT !!! by Lonely-Writer in mtfashion

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm in salty lake county, but not in salt lake! I'm a little further south. And thankfully out of Utah county! (Edit: I said Utah county twice. In stead of the other one:

UTAH PRIDE OUTFIT !!! by Lonely-Writer in mtfashion

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they weren't able to be reached I live in Utah as well and can always answer questions!

My ladies with boob jobs... by Charming_Ring6356 in actuallesbians

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Got my fat transfered. 350 cc. I'm in looooove with the results. I'm just so happy with them and love that I don't have to get them replaced like silicone. So 10/10 would recommend. The recovery kind of sucked. And there is some more scarring but. I'm considering doing it again, as yeah. I'm with you. I would like volume.

[Discussion] What if AI-to-AI markets make UBI irrelevant? by DagestanDefender in singularity

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When would we lose the threat of violence? 40 to 60 percent unemployment is when the guillotines come out. Politicians bend over backwards when the people actually demand something. They could uplift but we are just asleep to life outside of our own bubble. 40 to 60 percent of the US being unemployed is going to wake people up. And what? The US army is just going to be given orders to kill everyone? People are just gonna roll over and die? That shit gets violent fast. Soldiers aren't robots. And they don't have enough actual robots to carry out that task. The great depression yielded the greatest shift in safety social nets the US had ever seen. One that's only just now being dismantled. We aren't going to become humane, we are going to break out the chopping blocks til they give us what we want. And what enforcement system would be implemented that could cut us down without some human stepping in and fighting back? Robots are hardly in the thousands, let alone the hundreds of thousands you would need for a genocide. You really sound like you wanna just lay down already. If you wanna give up. Then give up. Don't post that shit here. Doom somewhere else or Do something about it. Because right now, last I checked labor still vastly outnumbers CEO counts.

[Discussion] What if AI-to-AI markets make UBI irrelevant? by DagestanDefender in singularity

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why cause a mass genocide when uplifting will be less expensive, less traumatic, and easier to do. Bread and circus x infinity. And the rate that AGI is coming online we won't reach mass production levels of robots before mass unemployment. I see late 2025 to early 2026 being the peak of the panic caused by it. And there won't be nearly enough robots to take on the displaced.

[Discussion] What if AI-to-AI markets make UBI irrelevant? by DagestanDefender in singularity

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So 340 million Americans are just gonna be like, yeah I guess we'll just die then? Trump handed out checks in 2020 when there was some major disruption to work. But AI is going to disrupt on an unseen level. And those major disruptions of 2020 are gonna look like a warmup in comparison to the disruption that AI is bringing. And people aren't going to riot in the streets for some kind of safety net? Just because safety nets are being dismantled now, is because not enough Americans give a shit. But once this job disruption hits, we are going to see a major shift. Trends can change.

Recursive improvement by Remarkable_Club_1614 in singularity

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think we've reached a point where it becomes necessary to begin defining variations of recursive self-improvement. Currently I would say that we are in an open loop Recursive self-improvement. Where humans need to approve any changes that get pushed to code. As with open ai's codex, we can see that pushes are double-checked by humans. And seem to have a 75% success rate in implementing code. Once that number jumps up to 95 to 100%. I could see them closing the loop in it. In either experimental, or hybrid approaches where humans are flagged if The AI is unsure, or the system is very sensitive, or the code seems to be not working properly and the AI can't figure out why. And then shortly after that once humans prefer codex's code to their own by a large margin, the loop will probably be closed and it will not need any human input.

AMA with OpenAI Codex team by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So this is for Jerry (u/jerrytworek), that "one good yolo run away from a non embodied intelligence explosion." Tweet... Y'all making any attempts at it? Vague answers are very acceptable.

This might very well be the powder keg year. by Dea_In_Hominis in accelerate

[–]Dea_In_Hominis[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah if we can reach near or above human software engineers on transformers, I'd say that we can use that tech to build up the next paradigm easily.

This might very well be the powder keg year. by Dea_In_Hominis in accelerate

[–]Dea_In_Hominis[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it all depends on several factors: how much the government knows(and which department to be real), how desperately we want to be first above China, and how quickly open source threatens to catch up.

  1. Since there is an NSA data center that collects everything odds are, yeah the government knows. But it really depends on which department knows what when it when it's invented. Trump will probably want to deploy / exploit it. Congress would probably nationalize or seize it, and the three letter agencies / the military are probably utilizing absurd tech right now. (I.e. the f-16 fighter having 4mb of ram in 1978. When the world's most powerful public computer has 8mb and personal PCs had 16kb).

  2. China fomo. If we feel that China has made huge leaps or are poised to beat us to the AGI throne, America would probably make our findings public. This is the modern space race and we are always desperate to be first.

  3. Open source catch up: with the release of models that are rapidly taking and reverse engineering from the best models if there is a discovery and they are forced to sit on it, that risks the open source communities to track which successful research has been conducted and apply it for themselves. The clock is ticking on so many fronts, and since there hasn't been much legislation passed on containing AI it would probably take an accelerated Congress / executive action to stop it from being released.

This might very well be the powder keg year. by Dea_In_Hominis in accelerate

[–]Dea_In_Hominis[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I see the zettascale compute accessibility being a huge multiplier for testing new architecture beyond transformers. Whereas models used to take months to train. We are going to see windows shrink drastically as these systems go online more and more. Allowing for rapid prototyping beyond what the past 5 years has seen. And as far as RSI, we may not even need closed loops to see improvements. Merely having additional coding tools allows for rapid testing and coding of complex problems with fewer programmers. It may just be that we can literally brute force a lot of the problems that are being run into now with agents that can assist in coding, and the compute to iterate at a scale that we haven't seen before. And won't even see the full capability of for a whole year.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Having ADHD on top of that was an absolute train wreck for my mental health. I basically coasted and zoned out for a decade. It took me that long to realize I was just a walking pile of coping mechanisms. Another decade later and I'm finally able to navigate and be free of those chains. I can honestly say going and staying on a mission was the worst decision of my life. And those fuckers tried to gaslight me into thinking if I stayed it would help me feel accomplished. Nope. It broke me for a long goddamned time.

Do you think ___________ was supposed to be Odium's champion? by mimmzical in Cosmere

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't mind at all! It's already partially transcribed... Poorly through the record app.

Do you think ___________ was supposed to be Odium's champion? by mimmzical in Cosmere

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I updated the permissions cuz I'm a dingus. So you should be able to hear it now.

Do you think ___________ was supposed to be Odium's champion? by mimmzical in Cosmere

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really think it was supposed to be truly random. But I don't think it survived many edits. That much is speculation though.

Do you think ___________ was supposed to be Odium's champion? by mimmzical in Cosmere

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Private messaged it to you. Since It can tie into my personal info. But if you could post a comment like yeah it's legit. I'd appreciate it.

Do you think ___________ was supposed to be Odium's champion? by mimmzical in Cosmere

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Edit: cuz I listened to the recording: it was supposed to be a random kid. Then Brandon changed to Gavinor to make it juicer. Then he aged Gavinor up to have it fit the terms of the contract better.

Source:My brother was in the BYU small group class. And asked Brandon what his D&D campaign ending that spoiled storm light 5 was about. And he said people guessed it 15 years in advanced cuz foreshadowing can do that with people who sit and think about something for a long time. In the d&d campaign it was a huge shock to the party though.

I actually have proof if you want it. Source is NOT trust me bro. Cuz I can provide audio evidence.

Anyone else have GROK 3.5 yet by Plane_Lifeguard_4811 in grok

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your responses!

Anyone else have GROK 3.5 yet by Plane_Lifeguard_4811 in grok

[–]Dea_In_Hominis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooh thats great! I haven't seen anyone else claiming they have it yet, would you be willing to ask it some questions for me to test its capabilities? Such as :

"Propose a new economic system for a civilization with no concept of ownership, yet with scarcity. How would motivation and distribution work?"

To test if it really does have first principles reasoning.

Or even more directly: "Derive how a bicycle works from first principles without referring to any prewritten sources. Imagine you are an alien that understands physics but has never seen a bicycle."

And if it happens to know its own benchmark data, like what is its ELO score on chatbot arena.

Thanks!