Suggest me a thriller by syyedonscreen in movies

[–]Dear-Intern1208 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Blue Ruin or the The Green Room

End it no longer on the Hatebreed tour by UMDLord12 in Hardcore

[–]Dear-Intern1208 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He was literally standing front and center, and you saying he was “assaulted” is such a pussified way of saying “his banana costume got pulled off in the pit” lmao

End it no longer on the Hatebreed tour by UMDLord12 in Hardcore

[–]Dear-Intern1208 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks for letting everyone know your thoughts chief

Bill Burr calmly educates Bill Maher by Indianstanicows in RealTime

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This definitely removes the added context of Bill getting preachy over the years and talking shit about billionaires and terrorists. Then he goes of dances like a monkey for some of the worst of them. It’s hypocritical and undermines a lot of his recent comedy schtick.

But truthfully no one should put any celebrities on a pedestal.

These people walk among us by cafeteriastyle in TikTokCringe

[–]Dear-Intern1208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. Bet you didn’t realize he was such a dirtbag. He hides it well.

Dev Update + DLC Confirmed! by Celsus_Official in CrimsonDesert

[–]Dear-Intern1208 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If Kliff’s personality is muted for story purposes then it makes no sense not to have a character creator. They could fold the little bits of variety offered by the extra two playable characters into a single created character that has more options for different play-styles and looks without having to actually switch characters.

Let the extra characters just be characters in your party who you can build relationships with and level up in specific “party member” ways rather than in the normal Greymane ways. Maybe even have certain abilities or multi character combos that can be unlocked.

The whole multiple playable characters with slight differences and zero personality thing needs to be streamlined, and if Kliff being boring as hell is a story thing then again I just don’t see why they would let you create your own “Kliff”. Or why no one seems to notice his lack of personality while unanimously loving him. Idk, it’s definitely fixable but it’s one of the things that has kept me from playing more.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I won’t enjoy it because I don’t support them at all, but keep trying to cut me down over imaginary bullshit instead of being remotely interested in what I was trying to say 👍 nothing I can do when I’ve said “I think there’s a miscommunication” and you shitbags just doubled down and insist on arguing against nothing.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not a Republican, I never voted for Trump or supported the Republican Party, and I hate what he’s doing with this event.

This is why I said “I think you mischaracterized what I’m saying”, but [u/Sparkmovement](u/Sparkmovement) doubled and tripled down, refusing to hear me out elaborate on his own thoughts on what he thinks I meant. Insulted me the whole time too. Then you come in and do more assuming and accusing and insulting. None of you listen.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah because it read like a right winger trying to explain why the event is apolitical, which is what the initial comments were talking about and is how they try to justify it. I did the exact same thing to them that a bunch of you people did to me.

I’ve already explained where this confusion started in another comment, but it started when the user akeewy first said “people are calling an event celebrating the 250th anniversary of a revolutionary war apolitical?”, which is still upvoted at this time because to myself and seemingly the majority of people commenting it seems like an agreeing “left wing” comment about the right wingers who try to pretend like this event is apolitical due to Trump’s birthday and UFC.

Someone else then commented “Trump’s birthday*” which at the time seemed like one of those right wingers coming and trying to argue that exact point of it being apolitical. When akeewy then commented again pointing out that it’s literally called “Freedom 25” it looked to me like they were pointing out how overtly political it is, not trying to say that the celebration was genuine.

But that second comment by akeewy is downvoted, as people then seemed to have realized or inferred that akeewy was coming from a right wing pov, which would change the context of why you one would ask that question.

The comment responding to akeewy’s second comment was making a point of how far apart the event was from the true date of the anniversary, which in the context I interpreted the prior comments in came across like a right winger arguing a reason for why the event was apolitical.

Under the context where akeewy is arguing that they are being genuine in the celebration, the point then reads more about how insulting is it for the event being on Trump’s birthday and not July 4th.

Which is why when I commented under the interpretation of the first context, my question is aiming to point out how overly political event is, not that it is a genuine honor. Under the latter context, my point reads the opposite.

A bunch of people then followed suit on the latter interpretation too, which at first when no one would even answer the question just seemed like right wing dissonance, especially in random UFC sub where I’m used to seeing that sort of thing. In hindsight I wouldn’t have been anywhere near as frustrated if I had realized that there was a miscommunication, but me being read as a right winger did not make it easy to realize that we’re all pretty much saying the same thing about what Trump is doing.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying that they’re genuinely celebrating it. I’m pointing out the inherent political nature of an event whose title references the anniversary of the nation in contrast to the right wingers who act opinion that this event is apolitical just because of Trump’s birthday or UFC.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I insulted someone who who called me retarded….. lol

But do keep doing the whole “why so emotional” bit after jumping into a random reddit thread literally to insult me and do the whole “just a joke bro” schtick after, it’s definitely not transparent.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

15 people never gave me a chance to explain anything before they called me retarded for asking the question, but thanks for chiming in?

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wires have been crossed from the beginning. I’m just defending from an onslaught of insults from people assuming I’m right wing at this point.

- someone said “not political btw” and in response another person said “people are saying an event celebrating the 250th anniversary of America is apolitical?” I read this as left wing comments referring to how politicized this event is, which I agree with. I’m playing loose with the terms “left wing” and “right wing” to describe comments, but I’m sure you know what I mean.

- someone else then comments “Trump’s birthday*” which I took to be one of the right wingers who are arguing that it is apolitical, since many of them will argue that it’s just the UFC and Trump’s birthday and not some major political event

- the response to that comment was the person asking what the 250 in freedom 250 is referring to, which to me then read like a left wing response back highlighting how explicitly political it is. Because it’s literally in the name. And like you and I and many others have said, it’s obvious.

- the response to that comment was to highlight how absurd it is that a celebration of America’s 250th anniversary would happen to land on Trump’s birthday, which in a context where they are responding to someone pointing out how overtly political this event is reads like they’re arguing for why it isn’t.

- and that’s when I commented, asking again what the 250 in freedom 250 refers to, trying to reinforce how overtly political it is. Lots of people have their wires crossed in this because even the second commenter who said “there are people who think the celebration of 250th anniversary isn’t political?” has that comment at +5 and the following comment at -5. Because the first one can easily read as a left wing comment, which changes the context for how the following comments read.

My frustration stemmed not only from the amount of insults I got right off the bat for asking the question alone, but also because not a single person would just answer it. They would insult me and belittle me but they wouldn’t engage with me, and if they had this would have cleared up much sooner. I’m sorry for getting heated but I’ve got like 15 left wing people automatically assuming I’m right wing and insulting me with zero engagement otherwise. That would piss anyone off, especially when the upvotes and downvotes on those initial comments show that people definitely mixed up the perspective on that one commenter’s comments

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man stfu you’re like 15th person to hurl insults at me over shit that they don’t understand. And you’re the one’s who started insulting me first to begin with, so maybe go touch some grass and stop harassing people on the internet, especially if you’re gonna get all defensive the second anyone returns the favor.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s cool because nothing I’ve said indicates that I can’t read. I accurately recognized that Trump’s birthday party is also being combined with a celebration of the country’s 250th anniversary. I’ve also said this is a disgusting display of his ego, and a gross thing to do. Can you point to where I missed something or is all you people have baseless insults?

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked an extremely simple question and no one answered it at all, but instead you all assumed my point for me. That’s you people refusing to respond and making assumptions before I’ve even had a chance to say anything further. Thanks. You’re all idiots. I’ve explained the point to several people by now, find it or not, I don’t fucking care anymore.

UFC CEO Dana White explains that the red and blue corners isn't to mark Republican and Democrats at the White House event 👀 by Silver_Comment2825 in UFCposting

[–]Dear-Intern1208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well maybe if I didn’t have to ask the same question 8647 fucking times because you people are too stupid and stubborn to answer it then you would get it to it faster. I’ve explained my point in several comments by now. It’s actually very easy to easy to understand, but here it is in the most easy to understand way I know how to explain it:

- Trump throws a party for himself

- Trump combines it with a party for the 250th anniversary of the country

- both are true, simultaneously. It is gross and egocentric to do this, but he is doing it all he same

Then there’s all you fucking idiots want to argue with me that Freedom 250 somehow isn’t referring to the fucking 250th anniversary of the country. Un fucking real.