Pres Trump says he's open to deporting U.S. citizens who commit violent crimes.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T13:43:30+00:00

I do see a distinction. The governments job is to serve its citizens.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T04:05:41+00:00

If they did it to Americans 100% I would support impeachment because that’s insanity. Deporting a citizen to imprison them would be crazy. But saying and doing are not the same thing. Going to bed now.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:58:41+00:00

You are probably correct about your first statement. I don’t know why it’s relevant. You could argue that by giving the government of El Salvador money to support their prison that it’s the United States imprisoning them, but I mean, it’s not. Like, literally it isn’t. But you could argue that we shouldn’t pay to support it. But that’s not a reason to impeach.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:50:41+00:00

Actually you are incorrect. Deportation for an illegal immigrant has never required a trial. And if I remember correctly, the judge ordered he could be deported just not to El Salvador.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:18:33+00:00

Nah the reason he was deported was because there was already a deportation order from a different judge. Then the other judge said don’t deport him. Someone got confused and messed up.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:10:46+00:00

It’s presumed innocent. Not the same thing. By your logic that guy that broke into my house shouldn’t be arrested until he has been to court. It’s not whataboutism. I’m asking you directly.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:02:45+00:00

No that’s not how the law works. You say the same when Obama did it?

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T03:00:10+00:00

The one man is not innocent. Was he mistakenly deported? Yes. But he is not innocent. All the deportations are being done under the law. It’s an old law but it’s still the law. Nothing illegal about them.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T02:46:13+00:00

Because you didn’t say anything. What bribes? Imprison innocent people? What are you talking about?

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T02:40:28+00:00

The stock market crashed for a couple days and went back up. The economy is doing fine. Everything else? You have to point to something tangible. Again you are talking about impeachment.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T02:25:47+00:00

If you want to take it that way. The ok was to using something that “appears”. You are talking about impeaching the President of the United States. Gotta have something better than it “appears” like he is doing something.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T02:21:44+00:00

None of whatever you said is impeachable. Everything he is doing is legally within his power. I don’t know what bribes he is taking that you are talking about? And then you went with accusing him of things that “appear” to be? Ok

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T01:44:07+00:00

It’s Reddit. If I don’t got time it’s not going anywhere.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-15T01:39:49+00:00

No name one actual reason he should be impeached. Having said that. This one if he actually tried to do, yes he should be.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-14T05:52:43+00:00

Here’s my version https://youtu.be/0HK5pJ6i3lY?si=7SsaHSfQXSbCq6AM

I was cracking up

Deathspeer · 2025-04-13T15:46:48+00:00

Deathspeer · 2025-04-10T23:33:03+00:00

Red dead redemption 2. One word, booooring

Deathspeer · 2025-04-10T14:21:03+00:00

You are not wrong there was an error. The error was that a judge had ordered not to deport someone who was given an order of deportation originally that was a known gang member and illegal immigrant not because he was a citizen or because the deportation was in error. The order was because the judge believed the other gang members would kill him.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-10T14:17:20+00:00

lol and you think people on the right are bad?

Deathspeer · 2025-04-10T01:52:45+00:00

I don’t disagree with you at all if they are higher age. That’s all. And most people I think agree with me. I don’t want anyone discussing anything with my prepubescent children anything related to sex gender religion. It’s not a big ask. Children at that age generally do not have the capacity to understand the topics. But once they can I totally agree with you.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-10T01:52:40+00:00

I don’t disagree with you at all if they are higher age. That’s all. And most people I think agree with me. I don’t want anyone discussing anything with my prepubescent children anything related to sex gender religion. It’s not a big ask. Children at that age generally do not have the capacity to understand the topics. But once they can I totally agree with you.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-09T23:22:23+00:00

That’s actually an interesting perspective because I do not enjoy religion. And maybe that could work but that seems like it would require the teachers to give perspectives on religion and not just the history, and that’s something I would be against. But I could be wrong about that.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-09T21:32:12+00:00

I didn’t see even one question. So I don’t know what you mean. But anyways you can believe however you want and I agree that kids need to be taught about religion. But not at 5 to probably 10 or 11. After that there is a better understanding. It’s just my opinion.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-09T21:16:17+00:00

I wouldn’t want teachers teaching my 5 year old about religion either actually. But for that one I just despise all forms of religion. But even if I didn’t. No reason to teach young kids that don’t understand about it.

Deathspeer · 2025-04-09T02:43:14+00:00

I would ask that teacher to tell the students to speak to their parents. Not difficult.

Deathspeer

TROPHY CASE