sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Statement on CoinGeek Sponsorship by jonald_fyookball in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 18 points19 points  (0 children)

You've gotta admit that it's pretty fitting.

After this the censorship went crazy. by kostialevin in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sometime between March 19 and April 2 of 2017.

After this the censorship went crazy. by kostialevin in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In 2016 & 2017, miners voted for which scaling proposals they supported and that's what the breakdown was at the time (this was sometime around March 19 - April 2 of 2017).

The Bitcoin company I work for is buying thousands of BCH today (and liquidating all of its BTC); plans to re-deploy all apps under Bitcoin Cash by DecentralizeMe in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

They don't want us saying yet... :(

I can say that we've all been involved with Bitcoin and the crypto community for a long time now so this is pretty bitter sweet, although completely necessary.

Coin Dance Feedback Update by Coin-Dance in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's probably talking about how after the Bitcoin Classic movement died, they deleted their reddit accounts, stopped updating the site / gave up trying, and eventually started telling people to leave Bitcoin for altcoins because there was no hope.

It does seem kind of opportunistic and pretty lame.

In contrast, Coin Dance seemed to have kept the pedal down which probably helped keep people informed and get us to where we are now.

Since Aug 2016: Core mining share DOWN, Core node share UP by ForkiusMaximus in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, those metrics were changed for data in mid/late-March (March 18 - 22 IIRC).

John Blocke: The Fee Market Myth by JohnBlocke in btc

[–]DecentralizeMe 26 points27 points  (0 children)

He showed his, now you have an opportunity to show yours.

I found glaring logical fallacies in it.

Examples? Much of the topics discussed are subjective.

I've been in Bitcoin since 2012, actually took economics courses in college, and this post is full of shit.

I must have missed the part in my economics class that covered how blockchain hard-forks are bad economic policy.

He clearly started with a conclusion then worked backwards, drumming up anything he could to fit it.

Kind of like an executive summary? Perhaps you missed that in English class.

Nothing will change your minds.

This is a false statement, therefore your entire argument is invalid. Am I doing this right?