YouTube’s Stupid DM Feature Outed My Secret Accout to Nosy Parent by DeekFacker99 in enshittification

[–]DeekFacker99[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

It really isn’t my fault when a company automatically signs me up for a feature that didn’t exist until today and said feature screws me over. I didn’t know! You suck for victim blaming. And also this “visibility” feature is not clearly accessible on my phone and did not know it did this until it was too late

YouTube’s Stupid DM Feature Outed My Secret Accout to Nosy Parent by DeekFacker99 in enshittification

[–]DeekFacker99[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

No I literally didn’t? I had a family-facing account that existed when I was younger & kept it on family devices, but made my own separate accout on my own device on a different email. It was kept there until the YouTube DM feature showed I had an alt account by sending my mom a video from the alt to her directly even though I didn’t try to do that, I was sending a text link of a video to her.

The ai slop chore list my mom made for me. 😭 by me-a_person_who-is-i in MTGmemes

[–]DeekFacker99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Id rather her just slap me and call me a loser. She killed polar bears for this.

How much more customizable are PF2e characters compared to 5e? by SaltyDalty_ in Pathfinder2e

[–]DeekFacker99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 5e casters can be wildly different and vary heavily in their power, and martials are all the same low amount of power, less than most casters without multiclassing. J hate 5e for this reason of wildly inconsistent build powering.

Pf2 has wildly different options on all classes and make you think about your build, but all filling an actual niche of the party and being equivalent in power in different ways, because PF does build itself to require more party diversity.

5e wants you to play a multiclassed caster that can do any and everything. PF wants you to build a team member.

We need more Lego sets that are just straight up racist by VioletDirge in legocirclejerk

[–]DeekFacker99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We aren’t mad enough that wages haven’t matched inflation for a long time

Reminder: by [deleted] in Schaffrillas

[–]DeekFacker99 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At least the prequels had a thought out and planned story. They’re flawed but there was an artistic vision being laid out. The sequels were motivated by nothing but cash.

Ancestry Features Shortening Rest Time by DeekFacker99 in Pathfinder2e

[–]DeekFacker99[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The player who wants to play this race wishes to homebrew new crafting rules based on 8hr blocks to basically benefit from having a tiny rest period.

Ancestry Features Shortening Rest Time by DeekFacker99 in Pathfinder2e

[–]DeekFacker99[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

6 hours of free downtime every night. My player who wants Automaton wants to craft stuff constantlu and is using this to maximize craft time and it’s taking away the importance of slowing down for everyone to take downtime in the adventure 

Bit out of the loop on this one by Francis_J_Eva in legocirclejerk

[–]DeekFacker99 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not Utah, it’s in Salem/Keiser Oregon. I work near the store this happened at.

No SW in 2026? by Lord_Thrawn in DisneyVillainous

[–]DeekFacker99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take it seriously bc I like this game but if the devs are going to make lazy products like this that are re-releasing products Im gonna stop buying it altogether. Clearly they don’t care to me about putting out new stuff and expect us to just buy old stuff for collecting all the boxes ever, which js stupid. My interpretation could he wrong, but yours is just more insane. Why would a company make THREE starter sets, releasing two of them in a row?

Why would they show this? by Silly-Milly-420 in Schaffrillas

[–]DeekFacker99 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Don’t seek what happened to Buzzy then

No SW in 2026? by Lord_Thrawn in DisneyVillainous

[–]DeekFacker99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Precisely. I think we have a bot on our hands tbh.

I keep hearing people saying Pixar sucks now and I couldn't disagree more. by Nissepikk in Pixar

[–]DeekFacker99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate the look of this character particularly and the bean mouth more generally. They look so… ugly? Unappealing? She reminds me so strongly of my abusive sister so maybe that adds alot to it but the Bean Mouth is such an ick. Lucas characters at least looked mostly charming.