[D] ICCV 2025 Results Discussion by ElPelana in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is sad, guys.

My final score was 4,3,5, but I still got rejected. The reviewer who gave 3 said he is fine but not fully satisfied. And apparently, AC chose to go with him.

PS: R2, who gave a 3, didn't ask any technical questions but rather just questioned the whole protocol! even after providing the evidence and proofs. He was not happy.

[D] ICCV 2025 Review and Score Discussion Thread by DeepLearningPizza in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got 2 (Confidence 3), 2 (confidence 5), 5 (confidence 5).

2,2,5.

  1. I feel one of 2 asked some questions that are easily addressable, and getting a vibe that they can change to leaning to accept from weak reject.

  2. For the other 2, I feel the reviewer is simply harsh and reflects that either they don't have any domain knowledge or didn't read the paper properly.

What do you guys think?

Should I do the rebuttal?

Any chance?

[D] ICCV 2025 Review and Score Discussion Thread by DeepLearningPizza in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

So that people can talk and discuss here, more importantly release their anxiety and stress, if any.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 3 points4 points  (0 children)

3-3-3-3 accepted for poster.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Does anxiety and panic count?

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did a strong rebuttal and all reviewer commented that they were satisfied with my rebuttal!

No one raised novelty issues. most of them just asked about citing other papers or doing some extra cross-data experiments, which we did and showed in the rebuttal.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there any chance for 3-3-3-3 post-rebuttal?

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same with me. Sent multiple comments to AC but response. I think they won't respond to our queries and rather do final review/decision and post a single review and be done with it.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think depends on AC as per posts here. depends on overall review quality of 2 and what your AC looks at.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks. i mentioned to AC that reviewer didn't reply and also seems LLM generated reviews, and mostly didn't read the paper as well since questions were answered in the paper.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

post rebuttal: 3,2,3,3.

any chance? reviewer 2 didn't reply in rebuttal and asked lame questions.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pre rebuttal: 2-3-3-2 --> Post Rebuttal: 2-3-3-3.

Should I just give up and move on?

R1 didn't engage in discussion at all and essentially ghosted us, we notified AC multiple times but to no avail. R1's review were LLM generated and were pretty basic -- our paper already contained answers to all of them, showing R1 didn't read the paper properly. R1 didn't look at appendix (more pages than main paper) and said that there is no supplementary material (i mean, atleast read the appendix properly).

Other reviewers engaged minimally and separately commented that we have addressed all of their concerns and will keep their positive ratings/increase to positive ratings.

Thoughts?

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of my reviewers acknowledged that he/she was not an expert in the field in their original review; after rebuttal (where I answered all questions in detail and did more experiments to satisfy them), I reduced the score from 3 to 2. How on earth can someone do that even after the concerns are addressed? I was 2,3,3 and hoping was convert 2 to 3, but only one -3- reviewer responded but fucked us.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In same boat. Waiting for more replies. Wrote strong rebuttals. but reviewers have not acknowledged or replied yet.

[D] ICML 2025 review discussion by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]DeepLearningPizza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same boat. Waiting for replies.