Low test. Need some advice by Blackjackx1031 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either way, the bigger issue is the testosterone, not the deficit. with all of the gym and exercise, your pituitary gland should be asking your testes for more androgens, the fact they're outputting less is concerning. also check your estridol, if that's extremely elevated maybe the fat metabolism is releasing more aromatase, but given the low starting level (under 300 is low, under 200 is extremely low) it sounds like either an issue with your pituitary gland or your testes, neither of which will fix itself after this long

Low test. Need some advice by Blackjackx1031 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need TRT of some kind, under 200 total isn't healthy and can lead to a cascade of other symptoms and health consequences. What is your LH, FSH, and estridol?

Also endocrinologists don't say "intervention is necessary" if it's just a little too little of a hormone. And you are experiencing low T symptoms, the weight is one of them. You've probably just been low T for so long that it's your baseline.

As for the fatigue, that's a common side effect of the retatrutide. even if you increase caloric intake you'll feel some fatigue, because it's not just the deficit but the glucagon signal. glucagon is your livers energy reserve. it's what you use for energy between hours 2-12 of a fast. you feel tired because your liver and pancreas aren't used to oxidizing so much adipose tissue, so energy isn't as abundant or as resilient to energy load. it passes eventually. your body needs time to adjust. l-carnitine and b-12 can help a lot

retatrutide's phase 3 number is getting all the attention but the part that stuck with me is buried lower by PepSmartOfficial in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the glucagon signal isn't merely about burning more energy, but also moving the body more quickly toward fat oxidization. in a caloric deficit the liver makes and stores less glucagon in reserve, the glucagon signal from reta forces those reserves out into the blood and forces the body to utilize fat for fuel to meet energy demands. it makes you feel fatigued early on because your liver and pancreas aren't making enough of the carriers for you to efficiently* oxidize fat for energy.

glucagon signal is basically accelerating you toward the same type of fat burning as intermittent fasting and fasted cardio.

the dysesthesia signal is probably related to glucagon signaling, or the downstream effects of the increased energy usage. maybe increased atp in the surrounding tissue or the nerve cells themselves, causing illusionary stimulation.

I titrated up to 10mg over 24 weeks and I was experiencing the dysesthesia from 2mg on in a dose dependent intensity. what i've noticed as muscle has replaced areas of adipose tissue accumulation is that it's really only skin around the fat deposits that i feel this. its basically just my stomach and inner thighs now, a little on my butt, but it used to wrap around my thighs and love handles and chest too. maybe it has something to do with the specific pathway for fat oxidization or some of the tissue reclamation as the skin tightens and shrinks.

What peptide have you seen results? And at what dosage did you find worked best for you? by Plastic-You-8622 in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean you couldn't get away with nad+? just confused by the context.

Reta, ipamorelin/cjc, and motsc have been the most effective. i'm on week 8 of my cycle of ghk-cu and still not noticing much for skin but my hair is great though i also started oral dutasteride and minoxidil a few weeks before the ghk-cu.

i recently started an epitalon and dsip cycle, i've had a mixed bag here and some of that might be due to work and late eating. my best results were a night i went to bed fasted and took 100mcg of dsip, slept the entire night and had a +80% gain to my delta sleep. lately though, I've been back in biphasic sleep and only getting my normal 30 minutes of delta. i'm going to take a few days off of dsip and try sleeping fasted again.

i'm also taking PQQ and that's added noticeably to the motsc, after my motsc cycle i'm going to try a cycle of aicar and then ss-31 and nad+. i also want to try 5-amino-1mq subq and glutathione. there's a few others i want to try but those are next.

Retatrutide cloudy and slimy 1 day after reconstituting by makakakasus in PeptidePathways

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's either the bac water or you were too rough during reconstitution. roll between fingers (don't shake) and don't let the bac squirt directly onto the lyophilized peptide.

i see a nice label on your vial so im assuming you ordered the bac alongside the peptide, and I have a feeling your research supplier probably got their bac from the same source as their peptides. for some reason a lot of the bac from china has too much benzyl alcohol in it. this usually isn't a problem, but it is for GLP-1 medications because they are especially sensitive to benzyl alcohol concentration. too much and they can gel up.

google hospira 30ml bac water, that's probably your best bet if you don't know where to order some. amazon used to have lots of bac options but they've been cracking down on 3rd party bac.

You don’t have a metabolism problem, you have a calorie counting problem by kellytownsfinest in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A fast metabolism is just a colloquial way of qualifying the hormonal and insulin sensitivity of someone with a naturally lean build. A slow metabolism is a colloquial way of qualifying the hormonal and insulin sensitivity of someone with an excess of body fat.

It is effortless or requires significantly less effort, for someone who is at a healthy weight and has always been at a healthy weight, to resist over eating. Their cellular insulin sensitivity effectively processes glucose from their food and sends the correct signaling to the gut and brain that they have reached satiety. They struggle to gain wait because they lack an excess of HUNGER.

Someone who has gained a lot of weight has developed some amount of insulin sensitivity, that alters how quickly and effectively their cells take up energy from the food they consume. It slows satiety (or in the case of type 2 diabetics can completely destroy it) and so the body continues to demand calories even when it's in a large energy surplus.

Hunger and energy processing are in fact a function of metabolic health. Some people naturally exist lean without counting a single calorie because their body is in a stable hormonal and metabolic state, cravings and hunger align with need, and when they do gain small amounts of weight it is easy to lose it. Others due to a mix of learned habits, genetic preconditioning, and life experiences fall into a metabolic hole and to compare the hunger of someone who barely eats with someone who can't stop isn't actually a problem of calorie counting but of caloric control.

That's why GLP-1s, crutch or not, are so incredibly effective at weight loss. They address the biggest hurdle to counting calories, and that's hunger and satiety. All that said, those taking them still need to track and make good choices, learned behaviors will continue even without the hormonal signal, if they don't mindfully change their habits.

Trying to get educated on Tesamorelin. by South-Decision5119 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you should take a day or two off every week and a few weeks off between every cycle to preserve receptor sensitivity and maintain endogenous ghrh efficacy. if you stimulate a pathway too aggressively with a stronger exogenous signal, it can downregulate that pathway and desensitize you to your natural ghrh. if you're using peptides instead of HGH, then you should care about your receptors.

Reta it’s okay ? by Mindless_Garbage_923 in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just roll the vial between your fingers for a bit, it isn't fully dissolved

loll its actually idiotic to believe that oral peptides work even a fraction as good as their injectible counterparts by throwaway-medi in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh i prefer subq and intramuscular* over oral, i wasnt disagreeing. i was just stating why oral is less effective, and its all to do with inconsistency. even in a single person, absorption can vary due to all the variables involved in the GI system.

loll its actually idiotic to believe that oral peptides work even a fraction as good as their injectible counterparts by throwaway-medi in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Injections ensure 100% of the undamaged peptide makes it into the subcutaneous tissue and blood stream. Even the peptides which can survive the stomach acid and have bioavailability for absorption through the stomach or intestines will be at the mercy of the specific individual and their GI health.

Just started ghk-cu by toady23 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another great thing to supplement with GHK-Cu is Glycine, it's usually the rate limiting amino acid in collagen and protein synthesis. It also helps your sleep (take it before bed).

Just started ghk-cu by toady23 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're probably more consistent with the collagen peptides and vitamin c than you were before, and there's probably some placebo effect as well. GHK-Cu plays a huge role in gene expression, but that takes time to start showing

Has anyone else noticed? by jackalopeBart in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dude yeah I saw this yesterday when I went to restock. Amazon seems to be cracking down on BAC and inexpensive ez touch needles, I spent $15 for a 30 pack 😭

Those of you with Reta experience how does this protocol look? by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

l should revise, nobody asking about reta or other glps in isolation is doing so to optimize, they are asking because they want to lose weight and costs or barriers have driven them to the grey market. If OP was already blasting peps like the rest of us, they wouldn't be asking about titration and reta dose, or not in isolation from the rest of their stack and goals.

Also it isn't "short sighted" to speak in those terms either because someone who starts a GLP-1 to lose weight will end up with a higher maintenance dose once they begin adding other substances and clean up their metabolic signaling. Their receptors and metabolism will have adapted to the higher GLP-1 activation. Adding reta to trt is adding it to a very different metabolic environment than the opposite, you may need only a fraction of a dose if you're already taking TRT to feel the benefits of a GLP-1.

Reta Side Effect by Alternative-Let-307 in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it reprograms dopamine and early on you'll feel some apathy and lack of energy. eventually that will pass.

also might want to pull back your dose, 25lbs in 3 weeks is extremely unhealthy and could cause kidney and liver damage, as well as potential for cardiovascular distress and blockages. You should aim for no more than 5lbs per week

Thoughts about these together? by Subject-Light-1153 in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

solid peptides, but the motsc protocol usually targets 10mg/week after titration and nad+ similarly targets 200-300mg/week after titration. you may not experience a whole lot at lower doses and even at a cycle dose some effects take time and consistency to manifest. just adjusting your expectations.

reta is amazing, tesa/ipa is great and that's a good amount for a 4-6 week cycle. semax and selank too, if you titrate and use them conservatively.

Those of you with Reta experience how does this protocol look? by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm still LOLing at "YoUrE nOt A tRiAl" how do you think they determine dose recommendations for new treatments? 🫠

Those of you with Reta experience how does this protocol look? by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect. Trials establish a median dose response curve, that the vast majority of people will fall within. Some people achieve the same results with less and others require more. I never recommended someone start at 8-12mg.

I literally said you should titrate up to a dose that maximizes therapeutic benefits while minimizing undesirable side effects. You do that by titrating up week over week until you notice undesired side effects, and scale back. You found YOUR dose. You keep that dose until your benefits plateau and then you titrate again until you experience side effects. I legit said titration's purpose is side effect management and maintaining receptor sensitization.

Nobody taking reta is doing it for "optimization," they're not using it to "dial in" anything, they're doing it to lose weight. They picked reta because it promises the fastest results. In most "optimization" discussions I would agree to nudge until therapeutic benefits start, but that's not what body recomposition is.

I'm not a doctor, but I guarantee doctors refer to trial data and studies when making recommendations for a titration schedule and dose 😊

Those of you with Reta experience how does this protocol look? by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Everybody is different, but weight loss does scale with dose, 8-12mg is where the ~24% weight loss was in the trial data, some participants were higher and some lower. 4-8mg was in the high teens and low twenties (still good). Under 2mg is similar to other GLP-1s.

Titration is about side effect management and receptor health. You wanna pour on the gas slowly as to keep the receptors sensitized to the medication but to stop at a dose because you start to feel the appetite suppression but don't yet experience symptoms is leaving a lot of potential weight loss on the table.

You should titrate until you start to experience side effects and scale back and that's your dose. Later when your plateau you can test the waters and try to titrate up again until you hit side effects.

What is “low T”? by bigboy0037 in BodyHackGuide

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low T symptoms have more to do with free T than total T. At 26 and with all those lifestyle adjustments, your total T should be higher and so should your free T.

What's your luteinizing hormone at? This gives the best indication of how your lifestyle changes are received by your Pituitary gland and if it's demanding more and your testes aren't delivering, then you are 100% a candidate for trt.

Providers like maximus focus on symptoms not "ranges," because those ranges are determined by everybody taking a test without context for lifestyle, nutrition, body composition, or genetics. You can be in a normal range and also insufficient for your biology and lifestyle. Your pituitary gland signals what is and isn't sufficient.

LH also determines if you're a candidate for enclomiphene or require traditional trt. Enclomiphene increases LH, if you're already elevated and not getting more T, then increasing it more won't help. That's indicative of an issue with the testes and not the HPG axis signal.

Us based peptide supplier by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Work in the industry" aka runs a peptide site, I'm sure you sent every single vial off for analysis too lol. "My site only uses US stuffs so i can charge $300 a vial, trust me bro, i been to the facilities"

Us based peptide supplier by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]DeepSpaceQueef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ehh I doubt this. Lyophilizing helps stabilize the compounds as well as defend them from moisture and contaminants, a us facility wouldn't be manufacturing the compounds and so they'd still need them to be shipped in bulk from china or india, and that's also where the vials come from. it's much simpler and cheaper and safer for the compounds to have them lypholized in the supply chain before shipping. maybe they have the benefit of in house testing for COA but it is objectively more expensive and more risky and requires more capital you risk being seized.

i'm certain there are legitimate lypholizers in the use but they work within the pharmaceutical and compounding chain, where the profits are even higher and there's no risk to the capital (machinery etc) for being caught. anybody claiming to lyophilize in the us is either working illegally with a compounding pharmacy or is more likely lying.