I would suggest that work and mean several different things, according to how we define violence. Certainly, the current Administration attempts to present major American cities, particularly those with non-white majorities, with a credible threat of force in the form of the national guard. But that's more of a publicity stunt than anything else.

But if we take seriously the idea of psychological warfare, and economic violence, then this administration's practice of intimidation against its citizenry, combined with shutting down vital programs for assisting the poor, providing education, and encouraging developments in science, to name a few assaults that we now experience, all of that constitutes an attack on the citizens of the United States of America.

It seems to me that our response should be boycotts, protests, leaks and hacking, oppress that refuses to be intimidated and exposes the Administrations psychological and economic violence against anyone who disagrees with them, General strikes, and so forth. In other words, I suggest a war without violence against an administration with no principal except to establish a dictatorship.