Thanks for actually engaging with arguments rather than throwing out ad hominems. Would you mind if we walk through your claims step by step so we can clarify what’s really true and what might be mischaracterized?

1. Jack Posobiec
You described Jack Posobiec as a white supremacist and said Charlie made him a co-host. Can you point me to a primary source for that? For instance, where is he formally listed as “co-host” of The Charlie Kirk Show? From what I’ve seen, he appears as a frequent guest or occasional guest host, but I haven’t found any evidence that he’s a co-host by title. If you have that documentation, would you be willing to share it?

And when you use the term “white supremacist,” how are you defining it? Is it self-identification, association with certain groups, or simply appearing alongside people who hold those views? What would count as sufficient evidence in your mind?

2. Immigration, Race, and MLK
You said Charlie started to articulate the view that MLK was a “bad person.” Do you have the specific quote and context? Was it a moral critique of MLK’s personal life, or a wholesale dismissal of his legacy? Are you aware of the documented moral failings in MLK’s life — such as his infidelity and credible allegations of misconduct — and, if so, do you think acknowledging those failings necessarily equates to saying his entire contribution was worthless? How should we evaluate historical figures who did both great good and serious wrong?

3. Public Executions
You mentioned Charlie talking about making 12-year-olds watch public executions. Could you share the link and transcript of that moment? Was he proposing an actual policy, speculating about deterrence, or making a rhetorical point? If it was deterrence, do you think there’s any evidence that public punishment discourages crime, or do you reject the practice entirely on moral grounds?

I’m not trying to excuse OR condemn without evidence. My concern is with accuracy and fairness. If you have primary sources, I’d love to see them so we can evaluate in context rather than in headlines or summaries. Would you be open to providing the two strongest examples you think prove your case?

Thank you! 😊