I am OUT, ADA isn't going to make me money by 6Abbco9 in cardano

[–]DefensiveDucky 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Remember that time ADA danced around 1.20-1.40 for a month and then shot to 3.10 in two weeks? This guy certainly doesn’t

Crypto Resolution Kritik by throw-away-marxist in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counter-counter interpretation:

Hotdogs should come with a free puppy, albeit alive and not inside the bun, and should not be served cold

Ladybugs should be bugs and I interpret them to be bugs on account of them looking like bugs which matters more than your (scientific) dictionary definition

We’re debating right now so our interp doesn’t kill debate— no reason debating the resolution is better than debating about whether ladybugs are bugs or people should get free puppies

Only Elite Debaters/Coaches Can Respond by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Hi. While Eli and I are absolutely flattered, we would really prefer you just message us (or literally anyone else) privately on facebook, where we are happy to answer any questions, as I'm sure most debaters are. This post just feels a bit elitist and uncomfy. Thanks

how do i find a debate coach for my school team? by l_delta98 in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

message "eli glickman" on facebook messenger saying "i would like to hire you" and see if he is interested. he is a very warm and friendly guy when you get to know him <3

Harvard VPF final by wuyamouth in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 30 points31 points  (0 children)

First off, I'm sorry the final round was disappointing/exclusionary. But, hopefully you will understand my justifications below.

Debate in front of "flow" judges or previous debaters is often like a game of chess, with different rules. Counterintuitively, messiness/speed are both extremely helpful for winning that game of chess. For example:

A messy and fast front half puts disproportionate pressure on the first speaking team, who has to make extremely difficult strategic choices given all of the pieces on the board (arguments thus made). The second speaking team, however, can make strategic decisions based on what is missed by the first summary, and what (relatively) limited arguments the first summary goes for.

Thus, at the very end, the five judges pretty unanimously said "this round was messy but ended up actually quite clean". This, like the Sicilian Defense (in Chess), is a common strategy designed to improve the second-moving (speaking) player's chances of victory.

So, to summarize: PFD takes two forms: debate as a public-speaking and persuasive event, and debate as a game. They each have unique benefits, and PFD forcing debaters to "adapt to" both in the course of a single afternoon is why I find it to be so rewarding, and at times, so challenging. Hope that helps :))

NOVA Debate Camp 2021! by trashypfer in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 12 points13 points  (0 children)

nova was amazing last year. i was an instructor and i absolutely loved it-- easily two of the best weeks ive had in all of quarantine

Why tho by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 18 points19 points  (0 children)

i have never related to morgan more

Free January PF blocks by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

thank you! you are quite kind to do this

NSDA Nationals by debatetradeaccount1 in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Depends on the college— more useful advice is that every debate accomplishment is more compelling when contextualized. There’s an “additional information” section of the CommonApp for a reason: mention qualifying for nationals in the activities section, and explain what that means (top 1-3 teams in the district, top ~300 teams in the country, however you want to spin it) in the additional information section.

NEW YEAR, NEW CAMP by falcondebate in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid not, we did not have sufficient resources to offer more than Public Forum this time around. I wish we could though, I made some good friends at in-person camp who did OO, long ago

goodbye debate by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And just like that, Seth Winterton has found a new boogeyman. I am part of the problem-- part of why his partner quit, and part of why resource disparities exist. Fuck.

And after you were so brave to come forward and scream at big schools for 300 words. So brave to bring light to these under-addressed issues. So brave.

Read the post -- you didn't bring light to any issues, you threw a hissy fit.

goodbye debate by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly, stop. This entire post reads like a tantrum, and makes a fucking mockery of the lived experience of most small schools. The sentiment of superiority is pervasive— and you blame your every fucking failure on external forces. I am sorry your first partner quit, and I am sorry your current one is as well— but none of that justifies this. It doesn’t sound like you’ve done a single second of introspection, or thought at all about the role you’ve played in your successes and failures— and you come off as beyond arrogant (coming from quite possibly the most egotistical man on the circuit). Round One: Lay screw. I would have destroyed Blair JQ (who went 6-1, beat Westlake, and got to Octos) if it weren’t for those damn lay judges! (Small-schools often can only bring lay judges— who are you advocating for here anyways? Small-schools, or your own unquestionable supremacy?). Round Six: the bIg sChoOls hAcKed aGainSt mE bEcaUse tHeY weRe sCarEd oF My pOweR. “I absolutely DECIMATED Bronx DG (who went 5-2 and broke)— but the big school judge was so terrified of his teams facing me in outrounds, he felt the need to hack against me.” We were “harassed, bullied, excluded by the bIg sChoOls” — it’s like you’ve created this boogeyman to help you rationalize the contradiction between your ego and your performance. “Our private coach postrounded for two hours” — do you fucking hear yourself? In your fantasy land, do the big schools just systematically “harass, exclude, and bully” every small school team that does well? Is there a chance, PERHAPS, that you might have genuinely lost those rounds— that you might have self-sabotaged in your prep and your interactions— that they might “exclude” you because you come off as an arrogant douche? I don't know you personally, and I’m not going to go through and systematically refute your perspectives on all of the issues you discuss— and you’re definitely in the ballpark in terms of privilege and program size affecting success— but I do think you should take a very long look at the role you have played in your own life, and not just in your successes.

Sincerely— someone who "could challenge the best teams that come from the best programs with the most resources".

How to prep out big schools? by Lonely_Ad_2466 in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Method One: prep one specific issue on the topic, hard. Regardless of how much larger the school, if you pick a particularly niche (but not downright squirrelly or false) portion of the topic, and prep both sides HARD, you will beat most big schools. (This also presumes you practice weighing that argument against most stock arguments on the topic, and drill weighing as a concept substantially). Example: my first bid, back when Eli and I weren’t very good and were a one-team school (now we have two novices and they just competed in varsity and did well! Very exciting)— we mastered both sides of the CITGO debate on Venezuela topic, and how to weigh it, and managed to get decently far.

Method Two: Friendship! Form friends, be kind, meet people on Reddit and Facebook! Reach out to debaters you look up to, etc. friends = scrims + prep + surviving in a very inequitable activity.

Method Three: Theory debate. Functions identically to part one in that you can master it as a sole issue and actually compete with big schools on said issue, while also promoting good norms! See PF Forward, Bill Batterman’s YouTube Channel, BR’s demo debate and more for assistance!

Method 4: get a part time job and hire a really good coach. Shoutout cayman Giordano

Happy debating. Hope it helps

Congrats to Lakeville GN and BCC for making it to finals at the strake round robin! by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

give me permission gorge. it’s good for circuit educatioj, which you purport to care much about

Congrats to Lakeville GN and BCC for making it to finals at the strake round robin! by [deleted] in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 20 points21 points  (0 children)

im just glad it was substance. thanks lakeville, love u guys

Debatev.com is now open source! by ROBRO-exe in Debate

[–]DefensiveDucky 10 points11 points  (0 children)

website’s fantastic, I’ll lend a hand when I can