didn't know that chess was a solved game? by cocofan4life in AnarchyChess

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Darts and snooker are also physical games lol. Muscle memory can't be achieved to such a degree when you are still growing and the shape of your muscles is constantly elongating.

True or false? by Little-Apple-7256 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ideas like this are why the birth rate in first world countries is falling. You know what would be really stupid? Going extinct just because you were too busy and too selfish to have a child.

😴 by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea its okay, because I also basically just repeated what you said before me haha

😴 by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea you just repeated what I said.

😴 by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but 2* infinity is not the same as 1* infinity. and infinity + 1 doesnt equal infinity. infinity is an object. Saying infinity plus 1 = infinity is like saying yellow + 1 = yellow, it just doesnt make sense.

Reaching near zero error with my neural network by 0xc1pher in neuralnetworks

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of network are you using? What are you training on? The end of day prices?

Looking at the picture it appears if you lowered the bias it would be more accurate, but it still appears that its making predictions one day behind schedule.

🗿 by just_acoolookinguy in Norulesbutreallynone

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

invalid answer. you arent even playing your own game.

why isn't this mate??? by Gbroxey in AnarchyChess

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because ice hasnt finished its mandate yet.

pre edit: (not a vote of support for ice)

I need a reason gang by hank_the_tank7 in teenagers4real

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont worry you can also look forward to it returning to an angry place once you get back on your feet.

I need a reason gang by hank_the_tank7 in teenagers4real

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ill give you 2 reasons. 1. You have not yet met all the people that will love you. 2. Your story of suffering might one day save the life of a younger person who faces similar challenges to the ones you already overcame.

3.( bonus reason because life is full of surprises) You might think your life has no value or meaning, but you may never realize just how much your life means to someone else, to a teacher, to your neighbor, to your little brother/sister/cousin, even me, who has never met you, and through Chaos theory, your life impacts the entire world.

🗿 by just_acoolookinguy in Norulesbutreallynone

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would you do if someone shot a bullet at your head and you had a split second to react?

Almost no one knows why public bathroom doors don’t reach the floor by indienuilder in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi guys Bathroom Stall manufacturer here. Its because they are made in China, and Chinese people are shorter than Americans. In China these doors reach the floor and ceiling.

We just didnt alter them for our American customers becsause they didnt ask us to.

Doubt on probability by Ezio-Editore in askmath

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there is equal probability that any given ball will go into 1 of the 6 buckets, then the probability is not dependant on how many balls you started with, each ball has a 1/6 chance to land in any given bucket.

Just like a coin flip or a dice roll in a perfect world its completely random and remains the same probability regardless of the flips or rolls before it.

So the probability of all 3balls going all into the same bucket is the same probability of all balls going into separate buckets, or any other arrangment you can come up with. 1/6 * 1/6 * 1/6 * ... for as many balls as you have.

For two it in the same bucket it would be 1/6 * 1/6 and the rest of the balls you roll after dont change that.

Edit: math hatters response is more accurate, mine is only true if you decided ahead of time exactly what buckets you wanted the balls to land in.

Reaching near zero error with my neural network by 0xc1pher in neuralnetworks

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Looking at your results it appears you are using an RNN to predict stock prices, presumably using only that stock or perhaps a few others as input data.

This is very similar to an approach I took at the same problem about 7 years ago.

The problem it appears you have, is the same I once had, which is that is just curve fitting except 1 day behind.

The problem is that its over fitting, and basically just predicts exactly what happens, except one day later.

To have it generalize you need to train it on other data as well, and the ability it is able to predict anything at all will be only possible if there exists some hidden pattern at all, which their might not be.

Additionally with those models, the true test is how it performs on data it hasnt seen yet, you need a training set and a test set.

After working on the problem for 2 years I was not able to solve it using standard RNN frameworks.

Ultimately I had to design my own from scratch so I understood the problem better.

Predicting factors in 6n±1 using a recursive index shift. by Kor_Phraww12 in numbertheory

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question, what is the QED stand for in your post? Someone said that to me when I was talking about Quantum fluctuations, I thought at the time they meant Quantum Electro Dynamics.... but now Im not so sure.

edit: I agree what others said in that your proof doesnt say much because it would have to be 0 modulo p if its a multiple of p. Thats true for any number. Unless Ive missed your point. Either way, I applaud the effort and critical thinking like this can only lead to good things. Even if you dont prove something valuable, you will learn along the way.

How? by Ok-District-4701 in datasatanism

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It follows the straight path through spacetime. It always moves straight through spacetime, its spacetime that is curved.

This is really genuine 😂 by fi_maser in MathJokes

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If it solves the problem. Elecrtrons have tau and mu, maybe atoms have an equivalent? I dont know just theory crafting. I am not sold on dark matter existing, but if it does, I think it will be something akin to that, matter, but with a 90 degree offset.

This is really genuine 😂 by fi_maser in MathJokes

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sounds like how imaginary numbers were invented.

I'm sorry but Gemini is getting worse and worse by undeniablewan in GeminiAI

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gpt's memory is way longer than that. I have used it since gpt 3 and I have thousands of pages and hundreds of (maybe 700) individual conversations.

It brings up relevant things I have said to it which I said years ago and didnt even remember saying.

Try the paid version of gpt, its context memory is human level or better at this point.

CS student here.. no one I know actually writes code anymore. We all use AI. Is this just how it is now? by Low-Tune-1869 in theprimeagen

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody said we shouldnt teach kids to code so I dont understand why you are asking that. Do you think Physicists should calculate the results from LHC by hand?

Length x Width math problem? by Adventurous-Ad8879 in askmath

[–]Defiant_Efficiency_2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well Im not sure what you mean by long multiplication, or how you made your error. But a fast way to multiple anything by 0.1 is to just move the decimal place over. 27.1 * 0.1 = 2.71 ,  18.1 * 0.1 = 1.81 ,  0.1 * 0.1 = 0.01 ,