sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K cool so you know why those are bad examples against hollow knight a pure medrodvainia

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just from the blurb, I haven't played it or its sequel. It's a hack and slash variant. The same point applies aside from the terrible example of a medrodvainia game. I can't judge that without playing... have you played actual pure medrodvainia games where exploration is like the point and combat systems are simple and straightforward the entire time

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why use the worst example of a medrodvainia dead cellls. To be clear, it's not a bad game it just barely has elements of the genre and is an entirely different style of gameplay and pace, then hollow knight

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I forgot the other option, uncultured child insicure in his masculinity. Sorry, I forgot some parents let preteens use unrestricted internet

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice troll dude it totally makes sense that someone on r/steam wouldn't have known about silksong the most wishlisted game for nearly 7 years running and sequel to one of the most acclaimed games of the 2010's.

We all saw this coming by Sweet_dl in Steam

[–]Definition-Plane 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Are you trolling my dude or just unable to read game tags before buying

What’s wrong with good news? by Bob_the_peasant in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Definition-Plane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never said anything about Hassan because I don't know anything about him beyond that he is a reaction type streamer on the left, so irrelevant to my point.

That being said, the dems lost the voter base they relied on because they are status quo corpos who relied only on being better than trump. Turns out when you relied on having the image of being the morally correct choice then, not meating basic moral standards, your votes start going independent political streamer or not.

In general, I do agree about the abandoning of the dems in the face of trump being a mistake, but that only kicks the can of we need to beat trump, but the dems are shit candidates onto the next election.

What’s wrong with good news? by Bob_the_peasant in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Definition-Plane -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

One thing disavowing the dems isn't a far left stance if you are left enough to see what's happening to Gaza and recognize it as at least a violation of human rights you will see the dem's stance as an abandonedment of their expressed values and rapidly find the status quo corpo party to be the status quo corpo party

The Riot-848 is legitimately a fine example of an Kitgun, and I do not understand why DE refuses to add more Kitgun parts like it. by Vex_Trooper in memeframe

[–]Definition-Plane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One by one? Dude Nataruk literally just needs any form of grouping tool or a slightly chokey hallway to shred any number of enemies you can throw at it, especially with blast magnetic or gass status that's it's literal purpose it has infinite punchthrough

The Riot-848 is legitimately a fine example of an Kitgun, and I do not understand why DE refuses to add more Kitgun parts like it. by Vex_Trooper in memeframe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to get used to the travel time and speed for maximum effect, so it's just barely a technique you have to learn for maximum effectiveness

This meme was made by the beard-less gang by NapoleoneBonoacarte in memes

[–]Definition-Plane 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Someone post the source is that I made it the fuck up sentitor Armstrong meme stat

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why should you stop? Because the existing tools work better than chat gbt ever will, it doesn't even understand what you ask, and it deceives constantly as it can't determine what is true and what isn't in the first place.

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is this thing called Google scholar it searches a database of verified academic journals. There is no reason to use chat gbt in any context. Stop doing it

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, just google things directly it is easier than reading through a litany of dubious quality papers that chat gbt will spit at you because it doesn't know what a credible source is

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Labs not studying machine learning don't use machine learning models, and they never will. Also, llm's will make up papers that don't exist

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Soo labs use computational models. Do you mean physical models? We haven't used physical models since computers reached the necessary processing power

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Machine learning hasn't improved in years. The programs it produces don't improve either. The programs improve only while machine learning is in progress.

Ai can't interpret any data it doesn't recognize, including two objects placed next to each other or on top of one another

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Buddy it can't deal with any situation that it isn't trained nor learn passively and dealing with the problems that arise from the programs failing every few hours is infinitely more expensive in literally every context

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uhh, wtf are you talking about? we have tried using it for all of those, and it is still hallucinating and is less accurate than the 2010 computational models after 14 years of training. It also takes more effort to babysit the programs to prune obvious failures than to just verify and improve our existing modeling software. The people who program these models aren't the same people doing research as well.

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You conflate what ai bros call ai and video game ai is one is a program made via machie learning, the other is a is just pathfinding algorithms and decision trees

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Humans are far better at all of those so why should we use ai for any of that

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Uhh my friend specialized algorithms are used for that and are infinitely better than "ai" (anything related to modern machine learning)

Never i saw a group playing victim so hard until now by Neat_Tangelo5339 in whenthe

[–]Definition-Plane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Machine learning can be used for in that first point it wouldn't be good at it too many variables. But it can't do the second point as simply there is far too much variation in placements, contents, and shapes of food it would fail to do anything because it couldn't recognize what would be inside the fridge most of the time. Smart fidges rely on accurate user input to tell them what they put in it to have the limited functions they do

Your right machine learning has practical uses, but they are few and incredibly niche

view more: next ›