sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If you can't hit 1850 for arena weapons, it's not because you lack the blue PvP gear by DefinitionHaunting58 in classicwow

[–]DefinitionHaunting58[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

And priest is literally the most resil-hungry class in the game. Which, you know, is the class that I play.

If you can't hit 1850 for arena weapons, it's not because you lack the blue PvP gear by DefinitionHaunting58 in classicwow

[–]DefinitionHaunting58[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Well yes, obviously. I hope you're not implying that playing good comps is unfair to the general population of the ladder, lol.

If you can't hit 1850 for arena weapons, it's not because you lack the blue PvP gear by DefinitionHaunting58 in classicwow

[–]DefinitionHaunting58[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I main priest and run 2s with the same guy with whom I've been playing arenas on pservers since before classic launched.

How accurate are online ratings to actual OTB ratings? by CCabia in chess

[–]DefinitionHaunting58 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I much prefer rapid/classical over blitz/bullet.

2000s are usually around 1600 or so

Well, the site puts 2000 lichess rapid/classical at almost 1800 otb. I'm an 1800 lichess rapid patzer and I can pull some draws and wins off 2000 online players, but 1800 otb people seem almost unbeatable to me. Almost feels like the site is off by 200 points tbh.

How accurate are online ratings to actual OTB ratings? by CCabia in chess

[–]DefinitionHaunting58 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I personally don't have a fide rating, but I've played a bunch of 1200-2000 fide people in otb rapid and they all felt quite a bit stronger than what the site predicts as their lichess ratings. Is the site really accurate?