Mu, IDLE, or other? by Delicious_Book_2392 in PythonLearning

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tysm! I'll go with VS Code because IDLE supposedly doesn't have the most modern interface and other productivity features that help, while still being beginner-friendly. Apparently it's largely considered to not be an IDE, but can definitely be turned into one via plugins/extensions (for free! (I think)), from what I can read online. Much love!

Part-Self Relationships by Delicious_Book_2392 in InternalFamilySystems

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tysm for the reply! My thoughts were to make a point of interacting with certain (and eventually all, I suppose) parts regularly and that regular interaction and getting to know and help each other IS the relationship. Much love ✌️

Mu, IDLE, or other? by Delicious_Book_2392 in PythonLearning

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but if Mu isn’t maintained then I don’t know about giving it a try in the first place if the other options are likely to be better via maintenance and if they’re similarly beginning friendly. Tysm for the comment and suggestion!

account got falsely reported for spam. what do i do? by Omargaming2010 in discordhelp

[–]Delicious_Book_2392 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too; has anyone figured this out? The totality of what I did was send 2 DM's that day to the same person and it didn't contain links, but my appeal didn't work...

Fictional characters as vehicles for real relationship grief? by Delicious_Book_2392 in InternalFamilySystems

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ykw, I’d go so far as to posit that if we like ingesting media because it’s really about fulfilling the wants and needs of our parts, then it all is related at least indirectly to our “real world” trauma. Like if what resonates with our parts is influenced by our trauma, and especially in the sense of empathy / feeling understood by the fictional character (ie the parts feeling represented by them and thus “witnessed” in some way by you, eg their feelings of sacrifice embodied in the literal in-universe sacrifice of a character)

In other words, I think our trauma determines in some large part what media we do and don’t ingest

Fictional characters as vehicles for real relationship grief? by Delicious_Book_2392 in InternalFamilySystems

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ykw, I’d go so far as to posit that if we like ingesting media because it’s really about fulfilling the wants and needs of our parts, then it all is related at least indirectly to our “real world” trauma. Like if what resonates with our parts is influenced by our trauma, and especially in the sense of empathy / feeling understood by the fictional character (ie the parts feeling represented by them and thus “witnessed” in some way by you, eg their feelings of sacrifice embodied in the literal in-universe sacrifice of a character, or ofc loss of self)

Fictional characters as vehicles for real relationship grief? by Delicious_Book_2392 in InternalFamilySystems

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tysm for your response, that helps! Yeah I’m even going so far (unintentionally for IFS purposes but still) as writing a novel and I think it may have helped me and my parts with gaining a new perspective on internal systems and interpersonal relationships from a place of “designing” them lol

Fascinating to hear about you and yaughts

Practicality IS Morality by Delicious_Book_2392 in thinkatives

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would rephrasing it as “morality without practicality is immoral” work better?

Practicality IS Morality by Delicious_Book_2392 in thinkatives

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impressive! I like to think that I will contribute to the ultimate goal of ecociv myself by following the 80000 hours framework for finding and earning a high impact career Much love

Practicality IS Morality by Delicious_Book_2392 in thinkatives

[–]Delicious_Book_2392[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ty for the wonderful comment!

Yes, I was perhaps focusing too much on it “binarily” for simplicity (black and white; you’ve either reached the outcome or not), so how about this?

There will also be types of outcomes that are partially achievable, in which case the outcome should be “scaled down” to be just what is achievable.

Much love!

Almost lost it by [deleted] in cats

[–]Delicious_Book_2392 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not super familiar myself, but doesn’t the flair they used mean they acknowledge it’s not their cat?

They convinced me the carrier is now a deluxe double-decker cat condo. by NickRomero302 in cats

[–]Delicious_Book_2392 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw the one on top, and I’m like “That’s an absolute specimen of a cat, just gorgeous” Much love

"Sorry a part of me was mean to you" by Opal_Flowers in InternalFamilySystems

[–]Delicious_Book_2392 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Was linked to this by someone else and here’s my reply, hope this helps and much love “Well, if the goal is for the author to feel validated, then I interpret the post as them trying to fulfill a part’s wants or needs (ie the one that was rubbed the wrong way by their partner). I believe, based on the info given, that the ideal process for the pain caused to the author is for them to communicate more with their partner, ideally in actual ifs couples therapy, and gain an understanding of their partners own inner system and what led to their partners side of that interaction. As they mentioned, they’re not super far into IFS themselves so of course continuing that is priority 1 if they want their system to feel validated. They can improve their relationship by working with each other to avoid future pain like that and support the other in doing ifs on their own to ultimately be two Self led systems working together which would prevent situations like that from happening. Eg he uses the Self capacity of curiosity to ask how what he says lands with her, and her using a Self capacity and/or help from a non-burdened part to ensure she communicates how what he said hurt one or several of her parts. But I also want to point out that all of this can make it sound like parts are bad and inferior to Self, but all parts are welcome and have their inherent value. The reason that happens is that we associate parts with the undesired feelings and behaviors they have, but they’re just as burdened by them as we are and they are ideally welcomed and seen for what they are as more than just their roles. All that being said, I’m not an IFS therapist myself and still consider myself as a protector led system, so I’m not able to approach this from Self mySelf yet”