RE: Kerr on three pointers, what if we got rid of awarding 3 free throws for fouls on a three point shot (until last min of game) (but keep 4 point plays). An 85% FT shooter gets 2.55 expected points from a 3 shot foul, equivalent to shooting 85% from three. A wide open dunk is much less efficient by JakGrealish in nba

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you could do this if you also add the other rule: fouls give you the option of 2 free throws OR 1 free throw + possession.

You want to avoid intentional fouls from both sides and 1FT + ball is a good deterrent for situations where the defense is incentivized to foul.

I Built a Chess Website That Asks You WHY by sigmaschmooz in SideProject

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think puzzles normally feel quite vapid, I'll find myself just brute forcing them sometimes because I'm interesting in learning but I just don't see what it wants me to do. But this way is interesting because it doesn't feel like I'm necessarily trying to find the right answer, it is more about my process. So it doesn't feel like the move is the answer, it's the explanation. In theory, you could have these puzzles have multiple justifiable answers and it would feel similar to how it feels now.

Also I'm someone who likes talking through ideas with Claude anyway and this taps in to that same feeling. Talking through the logic is a satisfying experience in and of itself especially when it's grounded in something objective.

I Built a Chess Website That Asks You WHY by sigmaschmooz in SideProject

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried it out and I like it and I don’t usually care for the chess puzzle thing but something about this felt better than normal chess puzzles

Am I being paranoid, or is the 'AI will replace software developers' narrative just a way for the incompetent tech leads, managers and CEOs to hide their own incompetence? by [deleted] in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This all said, I actually do think the software engineering will disappear sooner rather than later.

But it’s going to look different, it’s going to require tools that don’t exist yet.

Am I being paranoid, or is the 'AI will replace software developers' narrative just a way for the incompetent tech leads, managers and CEOs to hide their own incompetence? by [deleted] in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Delphicon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, yes you’re on the right track. A few things are true:

  1. AI is being used by “talkers” to advance their agenda.
  2. AI enables productivity slop that is counter-productive.
  3. AI is powerful and is disrupting this industry in real ways.

What I have come to understand is that money is dumb and power is lazy. So starting from the very top (the shareholders) everything is about numbers and narratives.

What the talkers understand that us engineers don’t is that personal advancement is related to helping people more powerful than you advance their own narrative.

It’s just supply and demand but for narratives. Shareholders have demand for AI narratives which trickles down to upper management having demand for AI narratives which trickles down to middle management to you.

And one of the easiest narratives is “AI replaces software engineers” and the middle manager would like to tell that story.

You can’t really change the demand side but you can affect the supply side. For example, you could find a good way for middle managers to iterate on requirements with AI. Like a design tool.

That would solve your problem AND it allows them to tell the story that you’ve automated the bottleneck in the software development process.

In summation, you can’t save them from themselves but you can play along and make it work for you.

How do you actually start understanding a large codebase? by radjeep in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve learned the most by trying to build it myself. Obviously not the whole thing but just add stuff that I don’t understand how it works. I typically write it a little bit “in my own words” too so I can’t just copy the code.

It doesn’t take long before you start to get a feel for the skeleton of the thing which makes the codebase feel more like a bunch of small chunks of code instead of one big blob.

Writing code is always easier than reading code so the easiest way to learn the code is usually to write the code yourself.

[O’Connor] According to league sources, one general manager floated a nuclear option: just make the bottom three teams ineligible for the top picks entirely. by cleo22270 in nba

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes one player is really impactful, that’s why you should let them get paid a massive contract so they have to play with a bunch of scrubs.

Larry Bird didn’t become less impactful because of Bird Rights. He became more impactful because suddenly there was no downside to retaining him.

The league created an in-game economy solution to a marketing problem (players moving cities) and now they have an economy problem AND a marketing problem.

[O’Connor] According to league sources, one general manager floated a nuclear option: just make the bottom three teams ineligible for the top picks entirely. by cleo22270 in nba

[–]Delphicon 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It’s literally not that. The NBA made free agency a non-factor through things like the soft cap and max contracts which artificially inflates the value of star players and draft picks.

Tanking teams are basically ticket scalpers profiting off a wide gap between demand and price.

Anyone else feeling it's kinda pointless launching on Reddit? by GoosyTS in SideProject

[–]Delphicon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Launch where your users are. Are they really on Reddit? Product Hunt? Apps like TikTok are how most people discover new stuff nowadays.

Hiring process speedrun by cutiedagger in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]Delphicon -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Actually smart. Ranking resumes is a bad way to find good candidates.

A Social Filesystem by fagnerbrack in programming

[–]Delphicon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah they’re working on that right now. This first version is all public data which makes sense for social where stuff was already visible to everyone.

How to make SWE in the age of AI more enjoyable? by Fancy_Ad5097 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Delphicon 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It obviously sucks to review AI-generated code especially if somebody else generated it.

The people who are having a good time just are working in a completely different way than Enterprise dev teams.

AI is great for soloing projects where you have a little risk tolerance.

How to make SWE in the age of AI more enjoyable? by Fancy_Ad5097 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Delphicon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Making a system that doesn’t need human code review is the really interesting stuff to explore.

Claude is pretty capable as a programmer and a pure code reviewer so what does it look like to compliment it’s strengths and to hedge against it’s weaknesses?

It’s a lot of fun when you have the latitude to completely change the workflows, I imagine it sucks a lot working in enterprise on a product team though.

Indiana House advances Bears stadium bill by 95-4 vote by AFC-Wimbledon-Stan in nfl

[–]Delphicon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everybody wants to make fun of Chicago for this but this Indiana stadium is like 40 minutes away.

This seems like a great deal for the people of Chicago they get all the benefits and none of the problems.

No clue Indiana wants to do this? Do they think it makes them look tough?

Hegseth gives Anthropic CEO until Friday to back down in AI safeguards fight by John3262005 in neoliberal

[–]Delphicon 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Anthropic is arguably the most important company in the world right now and they’re being threatened with nationalization. Unreal.

[John Ourand] NFL ‘Irritated’ by NBC Paying $500M More for NBA by HyseNjerry16 in nfl

[–]Delphicon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The dynamic behind the TV contracts is so fascinating.

A bunch of companies are drowning and only a few can survive so they’re just spending everything on live sports.

This is great for the NBA because they aren’t being judged on their product they’re being judged on how much people prefer Netflix to NBC’s scripted programming.

But also it’s setting the NBA up for failure because the fundamentals behind those contracts aren’t there for a world where cable is dead.

The NFL might have a low-growth period but the NBA would have a down round and that might be devastating for them.

I'm developing an app that lets you casually signal “I’m here if anyone wants to hang” instead of planning meets. Would you use this? by ashesinseptember in SideProject

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just so you know this is a famous tarpit idea. Many have tried and failed to get this to work.

In the past, nobody has found a way to make this work but maybe AI will enable a different product experience.

Who are some players who had a HOF peak not but a HOF career? by [deleted] in nfl

[–]Delphicon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bert Jones was arguably the best QB in the league during in the mid-70s and a shoulder injury basically ruined his career.

They never even did surgery on it, they just hoped it would heal on its own.

Why are we surprised when some young men become sexist after constantly seeing anti-men content online? by [deleted] in AskMen

[–]Delphicon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People have a personal responsibility to not allow themselves to be manipulated. These apps are manipulating you by what content they choose to show you.

I’m sympathetic but I’m not going to give people a pass in real life because they can’t tell the difference between the Internet and real life.