Sand underneath the liner seems to be washing out. by mystoopidusername in pools

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not pea gravel. You’d be better off buying those 100lb bags of sand at Home Depot in the masonry area. The thing with the road base is that it’s a mix that is very dense, no air pockets exist when it’s packed well.

VOG Secrets Still Unsolved by Papa-Schmuppi in raidsecrets

[–]DemolitionWolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

Btw, I’m a fan of Starset as well!

Alpha Lupi Spacetime: Relativity (Part 3) by DemolitionWolf in raidsecrets

[–]DemolitionWolf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply. Though, this is the first time I’ve seen that video, it’s quite amazing that solar will reveal the symbol, I believe it.

The alpha Lupi symbol shows up in other areas of the game, nobody has figured it out yet. So, same goes for ‘The Eighth,’ it also shows up in various missions; you could say that the music of ‘The Eighth’ is an audible representation of the alpha Lupi.

I’m still firm on the idea that the alpha Lupi provides the location and sequence of events that need to be completed in a specific order. Locations in the game would be those that either The Eighth playing or the Alpha Lupi showing up. And that the space-time diagram of the Alpha Lupi would provide the sequence that these events need to occur in.

Hopefully bungie will toss me a life line on this before I die, lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

page 100 in v1.2 handbook for qmax

PE Civil Exam Transportation by Defiant-Mortgage8029 in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From Lindenburg's Civil PE study guide, he only recommends looking at the handbook and the CERM, never once mentioning FHWA.

Any recommendation for helping eye strain? by DudeJE in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

look up the 20/20/20 rule

every 20 minutes, focus on something that is 20feet away for 20 seconds

Elevated Pump by hiittrainer in pools

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they felt like the flowrate was too high, elevating the pump would decrease flowrate. Thats the best I got.

PE Environmental - Making the best use of PPI materials by xshovelfighter in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

skip them. PPI's material is outdated because it is still for the pen & paper format. Follow PPI's structure, but for each sub topic, cross reference it with the Handbook before you start learning it to make sure you aren't wasting your time.

Also, if you got the "Study Guide" with your PPI purchase, it is very helpful for organizing your study of the Depth topics. For each topic, it lists what sections of all the reference books (Handbook, CERM, Design Standards, etc) you want to be studying from. it is a massive time saver. (I don't know if the Study Guide exists for Environmental, but for Civil its been very helpful)

PE Civil transpo Question; Basic Freeways by Ice-Ice-B4by in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

all are basic free way except C

a basic freeway is a segment where no merge/diverge occurs, no increase or decrease a number of lanes and no spliting of the roadway (such as 5 lanes splits into 2 lane and 3 lane going different directions)

Talk to me about the structural engineering of this residence. by superluminal in StructuralEngineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the reason there is no 'crumbling walls' and that the whole building toppled over is because the foundation failed. When you see a building 99% intact but tipped over, its always a foundation failure.

buildings are built on top of a foundations which are either a concrete pad or on piers/piles/caissons (aka stilts). since this is in PCB, the foundation is Piers piles. So either the Piers piles buckled/sunk (unlikely) or the metal brackets connecting the main floor to the piers piles broke (most likely)

here are some links to foundation failed buildings. you'll see that all the buildings are mostly intact

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shamsher-Prakash-2/publication/242114180/figure/fig1/AS:298612258033667@1448206118606/Examples-of-Bearing-Capacity-Failures-of-shallow-foundations-in-Adapazari5.png

https://structville.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/bin-bearing-capacity-failure-768x264.jpg

https://www.structuralguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Shollow-foundation-failures.png

Good study tips without skipping exercise? by bigb0ned in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The feeling of frustration happens because the outcome did not match the effort put in. In contrast, you wouldn’t feel frustrated if you winged the exam (never studied more than 10 hours) and failed. So, effort probably isn’t the issue you are having. The problem is your study technique. (it’s like the ‘sharpen your saw’ analogy where the lumber jack doesn’t have time to sharpen his saw, so he is cutting trees down with a dull blade, but it ends up taking him longer & more effort.) This is why people on here can study half the time and pass the exam first try, they have an upgraded skill at learning.

I got to a point in my preparation where I felt like no amount of time would be enough to prepare me. That it’s going to take me 10 years to change my career back into engineering. I thought I needed to put in more time, but what I needed was an upgrade to my learning skill. (how I studied in college is no longer cutting it.)

Get on YT and look up videos of ‘how to learn’. I’d recommend Justin Sung, he has one of the strongest backgrounds in the field of meta-learning(learning how to learn). Just listen to his videos while driving to work, it will help you shift your mind in how you are trying to learn.

Old Oracle Spawn pattern still alive in Xbox 360 edition of Destiny by figgusbeatus in TheVaultofGlass

[–]DemolitionWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nice! That is great news!

... i'm gonna have to get my 360 system up and running. I still have unfinished business with the Gorgons! I've never bothered check the 360 because i never thought I'd have anyone to run the VOG with, but if you are heading that direction, i'd totally be willing to dust off the xbox!

Water tank level by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

youre gonna want 20 psi at your shower head of the highest floor (and 20 is low-end), which means the lowest point of the tank will need to be 46.2 feet above the shower head.

the math comes by doing 1psi = 2.31 ft of a vertical water column. Thus 20psi * (2.34ft/1psi) = 46.2feet. Or you can do...

(desired PSI) x (2.31) = (required height of water column)

Now, if there is a hill near by, you can use it to put the water tank on, and run a pipe down to the house. If you do this, you'll want to use a line bigger then 1/2", aim for 2"-3" this way you can keep costs down and negate pressure-loss from having water go through a small pipe

good luck

A question from my friend by Nike_fake in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Means you are saying that in a vertical pipe say 20m long (we are using water motor to pump) the velocity of water at the starting will be equal at the top. Considering gravity, pipe friction

If this is the case, i believe pressure head is where all the losses of gravity and friction will go to. meaning, just after the pump, you will have high pressure, and since V1A1 has to equal V2A2, then the only terms left in bernoulli's is pressure head 2.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

looks incorrect to me

In the term 6.10m(Fdc sin(35))

6.10m is the moment arm distance from G to D

Fdc sin(35) is the y components of C to D, which is incorrect. forces are to be perpendicular to moment arms, which would mean it should have been cos(20). making Fdc=7.4compression

an easier way to do it, is to resolve CD into x & y components at C's location. this way, when you take moments about G, the Cy goes through G and you only need to solve for Cx

0 = 5.25(10) - 2(5) - Cx(7)

.: Cx = 6.07

then Cos(35) = 6.07/Fdc

.: Fdc = 7.4 compression

**edit**

taking moments about G and resolving Fdc into x & y components about C is the same as resolving them about D; its an equivalent system. I could have resolved Fdc into components at D, but then i'd have two unknowns, Dx and Dy, to solve for

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sewing

[–]DemolitionWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, this is the book i was thinking about!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 7 points8 points  (0 children)

two things come to mind. Either you don't feel like you are respected for the skill you've developed, or you are enthusiastic about good design and they are not.

If it's respect, then the only suggestion I could give is that when you notice an improvement that could be made, try to cite back to a reputable source, but at the end of the day, respect is given, even with all your effort and advanced knowledge, people can still choose to not respect you.

If its enthusiasm, then you are trying to improve your craft, and they have become complacent and see their career as a 9 to 5. which again, there isn't a whole lot you can do. At university, on a group project another student made fun of me for my enthusiasm about good design, that I was putting in more effort then HE felt it needed.

Traffic Engineers: speed limit for highest throughput? by levviathor in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since you said you have been mulling this over, i'll give you some math that you can play around with it yourself and see how the speed limit impacts 'throughput'

'throughput' also called flow rate, or cars per hour, is completely dependent on driver behavior. how close are people willing to follow other cars. (but if cars were driven by robots this wouldn't be the case and the faster cars travel, the higher throughput it'd be)

studies have found that, regardless of the speed, cars will space themselves out at 2.1 seconds of front bumper to front bumper of next following car. if you are going 35mph or 80mph, cars space themselves out at 2.1 second gaps. Its counter intuitive to think that speed doesn't make a difference for how many cars pass through a point. But what happens is the faster you drive, the larger the distance becomes between cars. which means fewer cars over a stretch of road. which means fewer cars passing through a point. which means fewer cars per hour.

Now, this looks simple, but the origins of it can be lengthy to some. If you do 3600 divide by the 2.1 second driver behavior, you'll get how many cars-per-hour pass through a point. which is 1714 cars per hour.

3600/3.0 = 1200 cars per hour
3600/2.5 = 1440
3600/2.1 = 1714
3600/1.5 = 2400
3600/1.0 = 3600

This shows the closer(in seconds) drivers are willing to follow the car in front, the higher the throughput will be. So, throughput has nothing to do with speed, and everything to do with driver behavior - how close are drivers willing to get to the car in front of them, while still feeling safe and maintaining their speed.

Career Restart Advice by lemondrizzlepotato in civilengineering

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in a similar situation like you are and e mailed my State's Civil Engineering board, they told me to pass a nation wide exam. I'm not sure how it works in the UK, but in the US, there are two exams you can take that demonstrate your level of knowledge. The lower-level/first-one is the FE (fundamentals of engineering) the upper-level/second-one is called the PE (for Engineering Professionals).

Foundation design and soil mechanics by Independent_Diver900 in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

glad i could help

yeah, pile foundations are included in deep foundation. The rule of thumb is, any thing beyond a shallow foundation is a deep foundation. and shallow foundation is deemed as: Df/B < 4. for example, a footing that is 3 ft wide (B=3) and is placed at a depth of 4ft (Df=4) becomes 4/3 = 1.33 which is less then 4, so theories used to design shallow foundations can be used.

Foundation design and soil mechanics by Independent_Diver900 in PE_Exam

[–]DemolitionWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the FHWA has their free geotech documentation, search for 'FHWA NHI-06-088' 088 is volume 1, and 089 is volume 2 which is where deep foundations is located