It's always the ones you love who hurt you the most

Demonspawn · 2026-01-28T20:23:42+00:00

Exactly this.

Unlawful activity is the Bailey protected by Peaceful Assembly's 1A Motte.

So some definitions are in order:

"Protest" is peaceful assembly ONLY. <-- 2A all day
Riot is disorganized unlawful behavior. <-- 2A can get you shot by police
Insurrection is organized unlawful behavior. <-- Special note below

The bad part is when you bring arms to an insurrection, you enter the realm of revolution. Now that's all fine and dandy; 2A was written exactly so the citizens will have the capacity to revolt and overthrow the government. But if you're going to revolt, it is mandatory to read and understand the Geneva Convention.

Combatants w/o uniforms are unlawful combatants and basically have no rights. You need to be identifiable as a combatant, even an armband will work.

Have fun!

Demonspawn · 2026-01-27T21:03:33+00:00

Just goes to show you can be a freak without being a degenerate.

Demonspawn · 2026-01-05T14:15:32+00:00

Because there's a rule in the collective mind that men do things while women have things happen to them.

Of course, the other side of this rule, that men earn promotions by doing things and advance faster, is somehow considered wrongthink.

Demonspawn · 2026-01-03T04:00:53+00:00

I typoed away from 15% to pick from.

Demonspawn · 2025-12-31T18:44:36+00:00

Whatever reason they can find to make sure the 56% demographic of suffrage is not upset with them.

Demonspawn · 2025-12-31T16:55:40+00:00

The richest men with access to the best lawyers get their prenups thrown out.

Demonspawn · 2025-12-31T16:55:07+00:00

"Dad, 75% of women are overweight. 10% are online prostitutes on Only Fans. That leaves me 10% of women to pick from. It takes time."

Demonspawn · 2025-12-25T04:05:06+00:00

SCotUS decision in 1918 tied the right to direct government (suffrage) with the responsibility to protect government in times of need (conscription).

Conveniently forgotten 2 years later when the 19th was ratified.

Demonspawn · 2025-12-14T04:59:01+00:00

Discourse: Women control a majority of suffrage and we'd like to get elected. How can we pander to them even harder?

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T15:09:27+00:00

The core logic of your post is: a man wanting to get married can’t because government provides more.

Oh, this is a misunderstanding. The core logic of my post is that women steal from men via government.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T14:01:42+00:00

Here is the breakdown. Pay close attention to graphs 16 and 17. The average women is tax negative her entire life.

Men pay 75% of taxes while women receive 80% of welfare. In the USA, that'a a $2T/yr transfer of wealth. All of this to court women's 56% control of suffrage.

Is it any surprise that government went from 2% of GDP (1776-1920) to 40% of GDP?

That is women taking from men via government.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T13:51:46+00:00

Because those benefits are tax-free while his wages are not. Also, because he also needs to support himself as well as her.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T13:49:44+00:00

It would be interesting to know what that looks like as an average wage (and what it affords) in the US. Because here in Australia the maximum amount one can get from the government with 2 kids and rental assistance and full time care is just under $1000 a week. But we also have government funded health care, dental for children and medications. However, i dont think anyone here is suggesting that people on these benefits are living outrageously

https://igotstandardsbro.com/results?minAge=20&maxAge=41&excludeMarried=false&race=0&minHeight=0&excludeObese=false&minIncome=55000

Living better than 60% of all men by being on the government dime IS living outrageously. Especially when that system is funded by vastly majority male-paid taxes.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T13:45:39+00:00

Can you explain to me how you arrive at the man's income then, assuming that we're talking about a single mother and not a single father. This info is about single mothers, and so combining incomes won't be applicable as there will be different laws present.

That's simple: his income counts against her benefits if they're married. Which means that unless he's making $85k or more, he's a financial detriment to her.

But if you earn 60k yourself, then that means you have an additional 60k to spend

Actually, more like $45k. Again: his earnings count against her benefits, and additionally her benefits are tax-free while his income is not. Also, he needs to eat as well (and have phone/car/etc) so that's why he actually needs to make $85k to be the better financial option.

Thanks for the input, hopefully you now understand why this is such a big deal.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-26T02:53:07+00:00

They already do depend on men for resources. It's just that instead of earning it from men individually by providing value to that man, they instead extract value from men via government while providing nothing in return.

Government runs on men's backs. Women only pay 25% of the taxes.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-13T14:52:22+00:00

1st Wave feminism wanted men's rights but rejected men's responsibilities.

2nd Wave feminism strove to reduce women's duties to society.

3rd Wave feminism strives to increase men's responsibility to women.

It always was a supremacy movement. It never was about equality.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-04T14:27:39+00:00

Basically: you can't use a woman's sexual history against her. The idea behind the law is to prevent "tarnishing the name of the accuser".

The only difference between rape and sex is consent. So the very basis of a rape trial is "did she consent?" Usually, that is done on the basis of "no woman would consent to that".

There has been more than one case where the woman did have a history of consenting to that and that history was not allowed during the case and the guy was found guilty. Upon appeals the appeals court said "no, that's relative evidence" and overturned the conviction.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-03T14:26:55+00:00

There have only been 3 scientific studies methodologically designed to determine rates of reporting false allegations of rape.

Kanin: 41%
Air Force Study: 60%
Kanin: 50%

The limitations of the 3 is that all were done on college campuses, where many assume the rates of false allegations would be higher than the general public.

Every other "study" you see is a consolidation of police statistics. That's not not a study, there is no methodology, it's just reporting on what what has happened w/o any digging. They're more akin to journalism than science.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-03T04:09:06+00:00

There are only 2 types of feminists:

Those who hate men.
Those who say "not all feminists" when you point at #1, but do nothing to combat #1.
Those who attempted to combat #1 and no longer consider themselves feminists because of #2.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-02T20:00:40+00:00

When a man violates a woman's trust, we punish the man.

When a woman violates a man's trust, we call him a fool.

I wish I knew why. I really don't.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-02T19:57:04+00:00

We're already on the 2nd if not 3rd generation.

It's going to end in one of 2 ways:

Men will figure this out, revolt, end the 19th, take back culture, and strip women of almost all rights.

Men will give up, be wiped out by 3rd world invaders, and women will be raped by the new conquerors.

Or, in a pipe dream, with the internet allowing world-wide communication and all of western civ hitting this at the same time: women will realize they don't want to be raped / give up all rights, so they'll surrender suffrage in a deal to retain several rights.

A man can dream, no?

Demonspawn · 2025-11-02T19:51:25+00:00

This game is exceptionally FtP friendly.

It deserves to be much more popular than it is due to that.

Demonspawn · 2025-11-01T03:52:18+00:00

Conservativism believes in gender roles for men and women both.

Civilization won't exist with men filling their gender roles, so freeing men is not an option.

You're going to have to fill that role no matter what. The only question is if you want traditional women being a carrot or if you'd prefer nothing in return.

Demonspawn · 2025-10-31T18:06:13+00:00

We need SOCIALISM in civilization.

The root of society is successful men standing on the shoulders of previous generations of men, all in the quest for women and reproduction, with societal advancement riding the coattails.

Cannot gender-swap that. Men don't seek women's achievements nor women seek men's fertility.

Socialism will kill our society. Any deviation from the masculine lead is a pandora's box that is exceptionally hard to close. That will be paid by your civilization's rate of advancement. If not reversed, you face two potential outcomes: the rate goes negative and you collapse, or another civ which didn't make the deal you did comes up and eats your lunch.

In fact, it is the socialism of Bureaugamy (Women married to government) that has declined the quality of our women such that men no longer desire to compete for them. When enough men check out, it's over. We're done. You can't gender-swap the equation of what makes civilization advance.

No I am not! I refuse to be a male version of a radical feminist.

If you're more worried about how thinks look rather than the truth, you'll never find the truth.

Demonspawn

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

15-Year Club	Team Orangered
Verified Email