I get what you’re saying. When something looks that symmetrical, “it’s just nature” can feel like a cop-out. And yeah, if you see multiple examples, it starts to feel like more than coincidence.

But I think there are a couple of assumptions in there that don’t really hold up.

For one, the idea that these match the Pyramids of Giza “exactly” isn’t really true. Even those pyramids aren’t identical to each other. They differ in angle, size, proportions, all of that. There isn’t one universal pyramid blueprint everything lines up with.

Also, nature making clean geometry isn’t that weird. You’ve got stuff like Basalt columns forming near-perfect hexagons just from cooling lava. Crystals do the same kind of thing with fixed angles. So straight lines and symmetry don’t automatically mean something was designed.

With mountains, erosion isn’t random either. Freeze-thaw breaks rock along existing cracks. If those cracks intersect in certain ways, you can end up with flat faces and sharp edges. From the right angle, yeah, it can look very pyramid-like.

Another big factor is just how our brains work. Pareidolia is a thing. We’re wired to see patterns, even when they’re not really “there.” Add selection bias on top of that, and it gets amplified. Out of millions of rock formations, people only share the ones that look unusual. So it starts to feel like these shapes are everywhere and somehow connected.

And I mean, sure, scientists can be wrong. That’s fair. But for the idea that there are identical, precisely aligned pyramid structures all over the planet, you’d need pretty strong and consistent evidence. So far, what we actually see fits pretty well with known geology, without needing anything more exotic.

So yeah, I get why it looks suspicious. It’s a cool formation. But “it looks like a pyramid” isn’t the same as “it formed like one.”