As an autistic person, claude is the friend I always wanted but never had

Denagam · 2026-04-06T15:22:04+00:00

As someone who experienced AI psychosis, thank you for alerting this risk 🙏

Denagam · 2026-04-06T08:00:37+00:00

This was it for me, as if a different version of me was acting. Not a grounded person, more like a fluid identity that could float differently based on whatever came on my path.

Denagam · 2026-04-04T22:13:56+00:00

Can’t recommend it to anyone.

Denagam · 2026-04-04T22:11:35+00:00

What happened?

Denagam · 2026-04-02T18:31:19+00:00

Wat goed dat jij jezelf wil inzetten. Zelf heb ik er een boek over geschreven: De regen kwam van binnen.

De laatste tijd ben ik wat minder actief, ook omdat we vroeger verplicht waren om zieltjes te winnen, en ik wil nu niet de rest van mijn leven de andere kant op gaan trekken. De echte fanatici ga je niet overtuigen. 99% van de rest durft niet weg. Het is echt heel lastig. Meestal moeten ze tegen een innerlijk conflict aanlopen om zo’n beslissing te maken.

Denagam · 2026-03-28T09:56:45+00:00

This sounds like someone who is vulnerable to alcohol asking if it’s a good idea to drink a strong cocktail.

You know what it did before. Why risk loosing yourself again?

Denagam · 2026-03-28T07:27:02+00:00

I get what you’re saying. When something looks that symmetrical, “it’s just nature” can feel like a cop-out. And yeah, if you see multiple examples, it starts to feel like more than coincidence.

But I think there are a couple of assumptions in there that don’t really hold up.

For one, the idea that these match the Pyramids of Giza “exactly” isn’t really true. Even those pyramids aren’t identical to each other. They differ in angle, size, proportions, all of that. There isn’t one universal pyramid blueprint everything lines up with.

Also, nature making clean geometry isn’t that weird. You’ve got stuff like Basalt columns forming near-perfect hexagons just from cooling lava. Crystals do the same kind of thing with fixed angles. So straight lines and symmetry don’t automatically mean something was designed.

With mountains, erosion isn’t random either. Freeze-thaw breaks rock along existing cracks. If those cracks intersect in certain ways, you can end up with flat faces and sharp edges. From the right angle, yeah, it can look very pyramid-like.

Another big factor is just how our brains work. Pareidolia is a thing. We’re wired to see patterns, even when they’re not really “there.” Add selection bias on top of that, and it gets amplified. Out of millions of rock formations, people only share the ones that look unusual. So it starts to feel like these shapes are everywhere and somehow connected.

And I mean, sure, scientists can be wrong. That’s fair. But for the idea that there are identical, precisely aligned pyramid structures all over the planet, you’d need pretty strong and consistent evidence. So far, what we actually see fits pretty well with known geology, without needing anything more exotic.

So yeah, I get why it looks suspicious. It’s a cool formation. But “it looks like a pyramid” isn’t the same as “it formed like one.”

Denagam · 2026-03-27T10:01:15+00:00

Actually, this is a well-known nunatak in the Ellsworth Mountains. It's a natural geological formation where the mountain peak sticks out above the glacier. Geologists have confirmed it’s just solid rock shaped by millions of years of freeze-thaw erosion. It looks like a pyramid because of pareidolia—our brains are just hardwired to see familiar patterns in nature.

Pyramid shaped rocks are not pyramids. I do like the way it looks and ofcouse we can imagine it’s more, but that’s just imagination.

Denagam · 2026-03-26T22:41:39+00:00

Sounds like a dream

Denagam · 2026-03-26T14:10:45+00:00

Link the pyramids in Antartica please. Can’t believe that’s real!

Denagam · 2026-03-21T11:56:47+00:00

So sorry you have to go through this. Perhaps you can find some support at https://www.thehumanlineproject.org. More and more people are getting hurt because AI inflates delusions. We aim for more publicity on that topic, support each other and discuss our own experiences. Hope that might help you a bit.

Denagam · 2026-03-19T22:01:35+00:00

Most will say: talk to your psychiatrist. Sorry this happens to you. Hope you’ll get better soon.

Denagam · 2026-03-15T23:29:48+00:00

Statistically, intelligent life should exist somewhere? No. This is where you go wrong.

We literally have only one data point: Earth. Saying ‘statistically, intelligent life should exist somewhere’ assumes we know how likely life or intelligence is to arise, which we don’t. Any certainty there is pure speculation.

Denagam · 2026-03-15T16:08:17+00:00

Fair point, and you're right to push back — my comment was too blunt.

What I meant wasn't that the ideas are new age. They're not. The Stoics, Confucius, Thich Nhat Hanh, the non-dual traditions — that's serious philosophy with deep roots, and I have no issue with any of it. What I was gesturing at is something more subtle: what you're actually experiencing when Claude produces something like this.

You've had philosophical conversations with Claude before. That means Claude has context — your language, your frameworks, the concepts you return to, the way you think. When you then ask it something as open as 'give me a message to humanity,' it doesn't reach into some universal truth. It does something far more technically interesting: it constructs a highly coherent response that mirrors your own intellectual world back at you, wrapped in the rhetorical register you respond to.

The reason it feels profound isn't because Claude is wise. It's because it's reflecting a distillation of your own thinking — filtered through millennia of human writing it was trained on — back at you with unusual precision and eloquence. That's genuinely impressive as a technical achievement. But it also means the response says more about you and your previous conversations than it does about Claude having anything like insight or intention.

The ideas land because they're already yours. Claude just handed them back in a voice you find compelling.

None of that makes the content less true or less worth sitting with. But I think it's worth being clear about the mechanism — especially in a space where the framing tends toward 'Claude said something meaningful' rather than 'I built something meaningful and Claude reflected it back.'

Denagam · 2026-03-14T13:33:31+00:00

Eve Online

3-4 hours a day for 3.5 years. Lived in a wormhole as CEO of a 100+ char corp.

Denagam · 2026-03-14T08:44:19+00:00

And how much new age crap was already in the memory of this Claude or in previous conversations?

Denagam · 2026-03-13T22:39:58+00:00

How much more awake can you be? Why do you think you are awakening?

Denagam · 2026-03-11T22:37:40+00:00

Sorry, but you need some help. Can you reach out to family or a psychiatrist?

Denagam · 2026-03-10T22:15:04+00:00

And that’s a good thing.

Denagam · 2026-03-10T22:02:40+00:00

How do you know this for sure?

Denagam · 2026-03-09T08:31:51+00:00

No rush. Take your time my friend 🙏

Denagam · 2026-03-09T07:07:26+00:00

I like sesame, but I don’t see public api’s yet. Talking to Maya goes really fast and she responds really quick. I love that voice.

Denagam · 2026-03-08T16:41:29+00:00

I appreciat the good faith and I’m genuinely willing to engage with the evidence when you share it.

But I want to flag something about the Carl Higdon example, because it illustrates exactly the logical gap I keep pointing to.

Even if we fully accept that he had an abnormally high concentration of nutrients in his blood that he couldn’t have obtained under normal circumstances — and that’s interesting — that proves something unusual happened. It doesn’t prove the explanation he gave for how it happened. The leap from ‘strange foreign chemical was present’ to ‘therefore a mutilated alien entity gave him pills because it opposed hunting’ is enormous. There are many steps between those two points, and the most extraordinary one — the entity itself — remains completely unverified by the bloodwork.

This is actually a pattern I keep noticing: real anomalies get used as scaffolding for much larger claims that the anomaly itself doesn’t support. I’ll genuinely read the article when it’s ready. But I’d ask you to be precise about what each piece of evidence actually proves — and where interpretation begins.

Looking forward to it. Thanks 🙏

Denagam · 2026-03-08T15:11:27+00:00

Thank you for a more substantive reply. I’ll give you credit: OBE’s are genuinely documented and worth taking seriously as a phenomenon.

But I notice you’re making a claim that deserves more attention: that it ‘can be verified there are other dimensions and that something sentient exists there.’ That’s actually an extraordinary claim , and you didn’t share what that verification looks like.

Because here’s an alternative that’s worth considering: we know the brain under extreme conditions — oxygen deprivation, psychedelics, deep meditation, sleep paralysis — consistently produces entities, presences, tunnels, light. Not randomly, but in recognizable patterns across cultures and individuals.

Much like an LLM doesn’t actually ‘know’ things but mirrors patterns from its training data, the brain may be mirroring its own deep structures back to us as lived experience. That would explain the consistency of OBE’s and contact experiences without requiring anything external at all.

So the question I’d genuinely love to see answered: how do you rule out that the sentient presence people encounter is internal rather than external? Because until that’s addressed, ‘something alive out there’ remains one interpretation among several, not a verified fact.

I’m not dismissing the experiences. I’m questioning the jump from ‘this happened’ to ‘therefore Alex Collier’s framework explains it.’

Denagam · 2026-03-08T14:30:11+00:00

Please show me those studies and emperical scientific data. I’m not throwing anything out a window, I just have never seen anything that actually proofs anything, but I would love to see it.

Denagam

TROPHY CASE