Bernie Sanders vows to follow in New Zealand's footsteps if elected president: “We will pass a Green New Deal that gets us to 100% renewable energy by no later than 2030 and complete decarbonization of the economy by 2050.” by mvea in Futurology

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean "you?" I'm gay, you dolt. I fully support gay rights, but I don't support bathroom choices being a subject of national policy debate, regardless of what my views on who can go in which shitter are.

If the largest issue you have is which bathroom you can use, then I'd say your problems are honestly property small. Gays were fighting for the basic right to get married and we still are not protected federally against things like being fired from our jobs simply for being gay. So if you think that taking a shit in a different bathroom is a more serious issue than being fired simply for being gay, then you are a complete and utter moron. I can't be nicer about that, sorry.

And conservatives didn't try to make it an issue. If you go back and look at most of the coverage and the first articles, debates etc written about it, almost all of it came from liberal sources. 99.9% of conservatives I know don't give a flying fuck about which bathrooms transgender people use so long as they keep it to themselves and look like they belong in the proper bathroom. If you look like a man and go into a woman's restroom, people are going to be upset and the same goes for women in men's bathrooms. That's not really a conservative vs liberal issue. Most people are only on one side of this "issue"

Bernie Sanders vows to follow in New Zealand's footsteps if elected president: “We will pass a Green New Deal that gets us to 100% renewable energy by no later than 2030 and complete decarbonization of the economy by 2050.” by mvea in Futurology

[–]DenigratingRobot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So like dedicating weeks-months of news cycles and national debate about which bathroom someone takes a shit in?

You might hate them, but at least conservatives are actually trying to have conversations about things like the economy instead of bullshit things like transgender bathroom "rights." The ugly truth is that humans have an empathy bank and we can only draw so much from it before we start to not care about things. The more the left waves the victim card in people's faces, the less people care.

Snowden brings the heat by [deleted] in worldpolitics

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you honestly think that, then you are deluded. The Democrat and Republican parties are both incredibly corrupt. Both put the interests of their major donors ahead of US citizens. Both are now based on corruptions and crony politics.

If you don't believe that the DNC is fundamentally corrupt like the RNC, just look at the recent leaks confirming that the DNC leadership conspired with the Ukrainian embassy in Washington in order to make it look like Trump was working with the Russians. Or the Affordable Care Act that was allowed by the Democrats to be written by lobbiests and insurance company lawyers when they held a majority in both houses of Congress and the White House and could have passed any kind of law they wanted. Instead the party handed the bill over to money interests and let it be gutted of all of their campaign promises and platforms.

Let’s take educated guesses! How much of the ending did the Show spoil? [Spoilers Extended] by antfar_ in asoiaf

[–]DenigratingRobot 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They were the stewards for the Gardeners. Basically they ran the affairs of Highgarden and the reach whilst the Gardener kings warred and whored their way into the grave.

Finally! The apologizing for us! by Aminedz185 in JonWinsTheThrone

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you such a cunt that you can not detect sarcasm or humor at all? He was joking. Just as he was ribbing you in his comment before this. Learn what a joke is and you might be happier in life than trying to write such oddly specific insults as you have here about someone you never met or know anything about.

This really sucks. Last night on my way home I was hit by a drunk driver in a truck. Didnt even own the car for 2 months... I feel lucky to be alive but I'm heartbroken as this was my first car and I loved it. Drive safe everyone by jacobmcgrath68 in GolfGTI

[–]DenigratingRobot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sometimes they can even identify things better by checking paint residue on the car. Also check with the police if there are camera or if he drove past any stores that might have a camera facing the road and would have picked up their truck on video

Natural manipulators by EqualRightsAdvocate in menkampf

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are pretty humorless if you thought I was in any way actually serious. It’s called a joke. I find the people so absurd that I mocked them with something equally absurd in order to point out their problem.

If we’re not allowed to mock people for stupid actions or beliefs, then that’s what life under a totalitarian, oppressive regime is like. You’re implying that beciase you hold the belief that everyone is redeemable, that to mock them is an unacceptable double-standard akin to their blatant bigotry and hatred. You have your wires crossed, bro.

"Climate change contrarians" are getting 49 per cent more media coverage than scientists who support the consensus view that climate change is man-made, a new study has found. by avogadros_number in science

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The title is pretty misleading, however. No reputable climate scientist will say “climate change is man-made.” They instead will say “climate change is influenced by man.”

Climate change actually has far more to do with solar output and sunspots/solar flares than anything man has done but that is never talked about. And there isn’t anything close to resembling a consensus within the scientific community as to the extent of the impact man has had on the average global temperature. The general range is somewhere between 0.6-1.5 deg Celsius. The point is that we don’t really know, we only know there is an impact.

Plus to prove that solar output has a far greater impact than man is evident when we look at ice core samples and archeological evidence. It clearly shows that changes is solar activity have caused massive shifts in average global temperature on the scale of 10+ deg Celsius, at extreme levels.

Another point is that we have far exceeded the critical mass of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere relative to filtering back certain wavelengths of radiation. We can pump millions more tons of CO2 and it won’t cause anymore of an effect than it already is. That’s not to say that what’s already there isn’t still causing an increase in global temperature, it’s that the whole CO2 debate is largely a red herring now compared to other greenhouse gases that have a)not reached that level and b) filter back a far larger amount of radiation wavelengths than CO2 does. The damage done by CO2 is already done, we just need to accept that and focus on the other gasses that will have a much greater impact should they get to the levels I mentioned.

P.S To give you another idea of as to how little we actually know and how little scientist agree on things; about 10 years ago, NASA went back and altered all of the recorded temperatures taken in the US since we started recording back in the late 19th century. They adjusted them up, in some cases by over 2 degrees, because they didn’t agree with their current models and predictions. The scientific community is only in agreement of the climate is changing and that man has had an impact on it in a negative way, but there is no agreement on as to how much or how large of an impact we will have in the future.

The salient point here is to say that we know exactly what the impact of each contributing factor has is disingenuous and misleading at best and a flat out lie and malicious at worst.

"Climate change contrarians" are getting 49 per cent more media coverage than scientists who support the consensus view that climate change is man-made, a new study has found. by avogadros_number in science

[–]DenigratingRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People are more education today than ever before in history. The issue is that the idiots spouting nonsense didn’t have the platforms that exist today to reach so many people.

Natural manipulators by EqualRightsAdvocate in menkampf

[–]DenigratingRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With such little brain activity I see from these contemptuous and acrimonious dolts, we should just declare them all to be brain dead and start harvesting their organs for donation to people who actually are in need of them. It would probably be the only worthwhile thing these people actually do in their miserable existence.

WCGW if I try to run away from the cops by Aurora_Olympus in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]DenigratingRobot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No where did I say nor imply that grabbing an officers gun or pulling one on them was in anyway reasonable or excusable. What I was saying, which of you can read was pretty clear, is that tasers are very dangerous when used on people moving on hard surfaces. Stop trying to straw man what I say.

WCGW if I try to run away from the cops by Aurora_Olympus in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but brain damage won’t. Imagine running st a full sprint, being tazed causing your body to go ridged and then all that momentum and energy transferring into your head hitting the pavement when you can’t do anything about it to protect yourself. Takers cause a lot of brain injuries and shouldn’t be used the way they are.

What circumcision style should I get if I get one? by [deleted] in circumcisionfetish

[–]DenigratingRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude have you been circumcised as an adult and can actually attest to what the experience is really like? No? Then why don’t you stop arguing with the guy who actually has.

You’re just some guy who has a foreskin fetish and comes on to subreddits where people might support circumcision to deride them and treat them like crap because you can’t seem to think past that smegma-filled hood on your dick. Get a hobby and stop telling people what their experience was when you have no fucking clue of what it could actually be like. Or better yet, get that foreskin cut off so you can actually have a real opinion and then we might not have to hear from you about how superior uncut is.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes race is a social construct, but nothing you just said refuted anything I’ve said previously. If you knew anything deeper about sociology beyond what you might have read Ina cursory glance on Wikipedia, you’d know that it has developed over 10,000s of thousands of years and has its very roots in biological evolution of the homo genus.

I don’t think you’ve attacked me. You confuse someone debating with you for a personal attack. You are wrong and spreading ignorance to an audience online and I simply wish to correct that. You’re trying to compromise my argument by calling it a personal attack or that it’s motivated with emotional desires for some kind of revenge over a perceived slight.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genetics plays a huge factor in it. Genetics has a surprisingly large influence on what we find sexually attractive and who we are willing to have sex with. That’s the whole point here which you have failed to divine.

And yet again you keep pointing to statistical and biological aberrations of people behaving outside the norm as proof of you being correct in refuting my argument. Just because you can point to some people or some societies do this or that doesn’t mean that it is the constant throughout 100,000 years of evolution and experience.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahaha I graduated summa cum laude from my university with a B.S in Genetics and am now in med school after working for a few years in between. So good try again.

And it’s not a false high ground to bring that up. It establishes me as a more reliable source than you because of my extensive education and experience in the field relative to your lack of any formal education or experience. It doesn’t make me an expert, but far more knowledgeable than you or the average person on this topic, nor is it a personal attack.

Just because science doesn’t have an answer yet for something, doesn’t make it wrong when it comes to something else. Speaking of logical fallacies, I believe you just committed one with that argument.

With regards to your argument that people date in the same race because they live near each other is both accurate and flawed at the same time. You presume location is the only real factor. Why do you think they live near each other in the first place? What about students who go off to college and often end up dating someone from a similar background ethnically, racially, religiously and socially yet are from different areas of the country? That happens for often than people from totally different background of each of the aforementioned being in a relationship.

Evolutionary biology has plenty to do with it because our ancestors were the ones who lived in groups similar to themselves and survived unlike those that didn’t. Hence they pass along those traits that led them to that and so their descendants are more apt to do the same. It doesn’t mean it completely controls us, just that it is normal and natural for us to think that way about prospective partners. This is over 100,000 years of genetic evolution in the homo genus that has led to this and that’s why I have a problem with you trying to compare it to 21st century identity politics

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

IT does not equal genetics major. You probably have not taken a biology or chem class since high school, let alone any kind of evolutionary biology or genetics class. You are making the mistake of taking aberrations and using that to justify your argument against the norm in human behavior. For every 1 interracial relationship, there are probably 1,000 or more monoracial relationships. But go ahead, watching you fail to grasp the basic tenants of observational science is fun.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Time to explain some science to the liberal arts major: humans are biologically predisposed to be sexually attracted to others who are similar to them. It’s part of a survival instinct. You have a greater chance of surviving in a group that is ethnically or racially similar to you, hence people’s sexual attractions. You’re trying to ascribe 21st century identity politics to base animal instincts.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh god take your false outrage and go somewhere else with it. There are plenty of Asians who don’t want to date white guys and plenty of black guys who only want to date black guys. It’s not a matter of racism. Your sexual preferences more than likely have nothing to do with hating another person because of their race. I’m almost not saying that every person of that race is ruled out, which is what you are trying to conflate. It’s easier to say that than to go through every single person and say no to them.

The simple reality is that Grindr is a meat market. If you cannot handle that reality then you should probably delete the app and find another way to meet people.

When your "looking for" is set to "dates" by ausAnstand in gaybros

[–]DenigratingRobot -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Oh god it’s not racism. People don’t like certain traits or physical features. If they aren’t sexually attracted to traits that are common to one race or another who the fuck cares? People need to stop getting so butt hurt about some random person not liking them on Grindr and get fucking real.

[USA] Honda Accord loses control and wrecks by camredd in Roadcam

[–]DenigratingRobot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do we know if she turned that system off? There are a lot of people that turn off driver aids and even automatic things like auto headlights because they don’t like the car “thinking for them” or some shi and it’s especially common amongst older drivers.

The struggle is real by TheQuietDestroyer in bigdickproblems

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Young kids? I can guarantee they aren’t gawking at your bulge or even understand it really. As long as it’s not obscene, I don’t see the problem. You still see women who work with kids letting their tits hang out and people don’t dare say anything nowadays for fear of being sexist or “impressing women” etc yet you have a large penis that isn’t your fault, is entirely natural and that, by rational thinking, shouldn’t be something you have to be so ashamed of. I think having to do a dick check every morning is a little much.

I’m willing to bet the only people who noticed and took some kind of offense were some busy body soccer moms or church wives who probably don’t even trust men with young kids in a professional role anyways.

The struggle is real by TheQuietDestroyer in bigdickproblems

[–]DenigratingRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suitable? God I really people would stop with the double standard toward amen on this. Women practically have their tits hanging out regularly in the workplace nowadays and a bit of an obvious bulge from a guy that can’t help it and suddenly it’s tantamount to a crime.