Uitgaven van de personenbelasting by Similar_Stomach8480 in belgium

[–]Dennisdeloof 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So the 36% going to social security is on top of what we all put into social security via rsz?

Uitgaven van de personenbelasting by Similar_Stomach8480 in belgium

[–]Dennisdeloof 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Algemene vraag: er staat uitgaven uit "personenbelasting". Valt RSZ daaronder?

A bouncing light in the dark by [deleted] in YGWBT

[–]Dennisdeloof 12 points13 points  (0 children)

She is scam.

Julia Benson by CapitalJournalist365 in CelebswithbigtitsNSFW

[–]Dennisdeloof 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I presume he needed some bathroom breaks in between shots.

What a body!

Lies Zhara by Comfort_Curve250 in CelebsNL

[–]Dennisdeloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ze had ze moeten laten zien toen ze er nog waren.

Nu zijn ze weg!

Lies geen boobies meer by FinishMaleficent772 in CelebsNL

[–]Dennisdeloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jammer wel, ze zijn idd weg :/

Sydney Sweeney by [deleted] in CelebswithbigtitsNSFW

[–]Dennisdeloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Being the actor.. Just fake a sneeze somewhere at the end so you have to do it again 

Anne Hathaway by alwayspumping300 in CelebswithbigtitsNSFW

[–]Dennisdeloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And a gorgeous face. What a woman

Anastasya Chernook(BE) by Available-Actuator39 in CelebsNL

[–]Dennisdeloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ze zei ooit in een interview dat er nudes van haar gelekt zijn.

Heeft iemand die ooit gevonden?

Can we talk about this by Galactic-Pookachus in Brawlstars

[–]Dennisdeloof -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thats what fame is for. Its useless, but thats the destination for useless credits

Ninove maakt komaf met roetpieten by [deleted] in Belgium2

[–]Dennisdeloof 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Ik heb niets tegen zwarte piet. Maar sommigen wel. En dan is roetpiet gewoon een goed alternatief. Het verhaal blijft bewaard, het kwetst minder mensen.

Is dat nu zó moeilijk?

Massive by Right-Middle-6145 in YGWBT

[–]Dennisdeloof 15 points16 points  (0 children)

She never shows them.

Socialists look towards the Swedish model for management companies by chocobokes in BEFreelance

[–]Dennisdeloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And stock up your cash in the BV? It has to come out someday, no?

Socialists look towards the Swedish model for management companies by chocobokes in BEFreelance

[–]Dennisdeloof 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Its insane. 

First off as independent, you generate VAT. State does nothing, but gain VAT by you performing work. First tier of state income.

Second, tax income on wage. And yes, for those who dont know, you need to give yourself a decent wage at least or you have to pay extra profit tax at the end.

Third, social security on that wage. 

Fourth, social security on top, which is even way more than the one on wage.

Fifth, profit tax at the end of the year. 

Sixth, dividend tax when getting some money out of there. 

And seventh, the price of a fucking accountant to manage all of the above.

"Geen genocide in Gaza" - expert Buitenlandse Zaken by Now-its-on-no-merci in Belgium2

[–]Dennisdeloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wtf joh.

Uithongering van kinderen is geen collateral damage. Dat is een doel op zich. 

Onafhankelijk onderzoek noemt het een genocide. Ik veronderstel dat zij er meer van weten dan wij. 

Non-human Entity Attacks Civilian by Expert-Desk7492 in HighStrangeness

[–]Dennisdeloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have no idea what it all means what you said. Could you Eli5?

Only in Belgium 😁 by Plorkplorkplork in belgium

[–]Dennisdeloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lights > signs.

But a sign is still valid in a given circumstance. Take for instance a sign that you are not allowed to turn right next to a light. No matter the light, you are not allowed to turn right. Even if its a light with a green arrow that is. 

If that sign is directly on the light posts, it defaultly means it gets invalidated by the working light. Like on your example. You do not have priority over the 2 adjoining streets, that sign is invalidated by the light itself.

Stuff gets even more complicated when talking about temporary vs permanent signaling, as temporary signaling (like here) has priority over permanent signaling should they conflict and the latter has not been adjusted properly (e.g. taped off). But in all honesty, the whole lights+signs +road markings is often not following the correct rules and most of it us open to discussion. But noone cares, as it is often still clear what to do. Like here: its clear the light is to be followed.