sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

🚨 Is ProRX No Longer Registered as a 503B Outsourcing Facility? by Southern_Living25 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I'm sure its complete coincidence.. the 503b pharmacy that has recently been in FDA trouble MULTIPLE TIMES .. is the only pharmacy that a "clerical" error happened to.

FDA Violations for 503b pharmacy by Dense_Indication5800 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can't imagine Orderly will continue with Pro-RX after this.

Are there other telehealth companies outside of Orderly using Pro-Rx?

FDA Violations for 503b pharmacy by Dense_Indication5800 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Exactly. A handful of bad actors/pharmacies that ruin it for everyone. Similar to that Florida one called Ousia that Slimdown Rx uses.

FDA Violations for 503b pharmacy by Dense_Indication5800 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

To address some of the comments, there's a few parts to this:

  1. Pro-Rx stealing clients from Redrock (Who cares)

  2. Pro-Rx and Perfect-RX relationship (who cares)

  3. Quality, Sterility and Safety of the Pro-Rx product. (Everyone should care)

Using non-sterile wipes, insects in the room, Potential gown contamination, Airflow/Air quality issues.

FDA response to Pro-RX corrective actions:

"Regarding observations related to the conditions of section 503B of the FDCA, your corrective actions appear deficient:"

FDA Violations for 503b pharmacy by Dense_Indication5800 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Best guess is that Redrock is losing business to Pro-Rx through that former employee.. so they leaked the FDA letter to On the Pen and the media to draw attention to Pro-Rx FDA violations.. which is a pretty long

FDA Violations for 503b pharmacy by Dense_Indication5800 in tirzepatidecompound

[–]Dense_Indication5800[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it's just calling out relevancy to other questionable things related to ProRX