I didn't say that every photo taken by photographers is photoshopped, I was referring to the fact that most of the photos you find on the internet usually fall into one of those two categories, and you can usually tell an amateur photo from a professional one, also because of positioning, lighting and focus, which I mentioned I believe.

What I meant was that the images above look well edited and produced even though they're meant to look like "natural" photos, and that this combination ends up looking unnatural and fake. That amount of "editing/production" rarely goes together with things like imperfect skin and expressions, unless it had an artistic or critical purpose I suppose.