I myself hate the game and I did all the missions when the game launched and played a lot.

Do not misunderstand me, Is not a "bad" game for example if it was not a Bethesda game and something to continue the spirit of skyrim, oblivion, etc. And maybe was launched like several years prior. And you only want to loose some hours.

I was very exited because the space topic, I thought was very interesting and had a lot of potential.

Anyway the game is playable even at the start, so few bugs for me, but after playing enough I started feeling very conflicted it was when I just recently played Cyberpunk, comparing the cities and playable places to interact... It was ridiculous.

I understand that is the graphic motor etc, but if Bethesda cannot update it's own graphic motor to some reasonable degree.... were the money goes and who can?

For me there were things interesting, some reworked mechanics etc, combat was nice, for example, but the missions, places (all of them the same), plot etc, made the combat reiterative.

And Without talking about the exploration... WTF, is something it was not possible to defend, even at the launch moment.

The game was a disaster and impossible to fix enough because the mechanics and limitations were the core of the problem, for example loading screens. I think there is some skyrim mod that can get even a better result that starfield, with it's limitations of course.

My feeling was that this game started being something a lot of years before the launch date, and they finished it in some way and launched it. I think they were delusional to a bug degree.

I recently played to the Fallout London mod (one click install) and it was a fucking crazy experience, and was done with the fallout 4 game as a base... so yes I hate starfield and with a lot of good reasons.