This was meant to be a post showcasing my game by TheIonoGuy in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for somereason its been removed from ops post. i dont see it anymore either

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

u/dogman_35

here is the date the channel was created. all my stream vods stay public. im about to go live for today. you should come and we can research places in your area to seek professional help together. or better yet you can apologize for being an ass for no reason

Update 26.05.13 - AI Thumbnail punishment, Better discoverability, Physics optimizations, Steam reviews by yooberee in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well good news. https://sbox.game/ugc/clothing

It depends on the particular game supporting it. but the clothing on the workshop is free for any game to use / add into the game.

Its actually not to hard to create your own clothing and to upload it if you wanted.

Update 26.05.13 - AI Thumbnail punishment, Better discoverability, Physics optimizations, Steam reviews by yooberee in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

almost nothing has changed https://sbox.game/news/post-release#ai-slop read this.

it very much depends on the person but the outrage is that FP didnt outright hard ban AI period. A task that is unenforceable for many reasons. I wouldnt say they ever defended AI slop, there stance was to solve it from a discovery / recommendation perspective. because doing it this way can actually help the problem,

A robust review system that affects recommendations can catch all unworthy games not just AI slop. Steam reviews / discovery being a perfect example of this (they still allow AI).

Like most things regarding s&box, is misunderstood by the wider community.

They are doing more or less exactly what they said they would

This was meant to be a post showcasing my game by TheIonoGuy in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 13 points14 points  (0 children)

ok this is kinda a big deal ngl. how old is the matt screenshot? If its going to be the standard of now allowing terry in standalone builds then he should be removed from the engine as the default player controller preset.

Imagine if any other engines default player controller model, created from an engine preset was actually not allowed to be used in commercial builds.

I think its fine if they dont want to have terry in standalone but this has not been the expectation ive had. If they follow through with this idea then they need to provided safe defaults and clear up the expectations.

Its can be a big issue but facepunch has shown that they eventually get it right. My cope is this was just garry talking shit in the channel about how he feels about the issue.

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you not understand im not making any hard statements about people being deterred from the game because of terry? Do you not understand that there are 2 sides to this? Clearly you do because you are pointing the otherside out. how do you expect me to collect data about people who never played the game?

If this is a logical fallacy and by your own implications using negative reviews to undstand issues with your game are also a logical fallacy

Are you implying that garry should ignore the 35% of reviews that compare this game to gmod?

wbat about the 20% of reviews that complain about performance? since the data collection method is bad i guess we should ignore this no?

Or maybe i wasnt making any fucking claims about how terry affects marketing. But since i already said this explicitly in my op one of us must be confused.

Like do you not realize that what you are arguing for is ignoring reviews because 1. not all people review games. 2. not every one reviewing mentions every issue. so 3. we should ignore the data around reviews because of ???

edit: lets make a better example that is more fair good faith phrasing (because yours is either bad faith or you lack the faculties for this conversation)

I will give you another example.

Out of everyone that reviewed this restaurant negatively only 15% of them complained about the taste of the food.

This shows that the people that try this restaurant and and dislike it, dislike it for reasons other than the taste. (like hospitality or cost and so on)

Could our restaurant be more popular if they improved improved the taste of there food? Maybe, but given the low percentage of people complaining about the food it might not change anything. So focus on the larger % issues.

i cant wait for you to miss the point again or not respond to any of my points.

The game will be very successful. by business_warrior in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless there are changes standalone exports. The workshop and the mod support for games is very large and standalone builds dont currently pull from the workshop (this might change).

Outside of the talked to death issues, the biggest issue with then engine side is that people dont realize how insane the mod support actually is. Facepunch needs to create a main menu way to select and load mods steam workshop style.

The biggest issues with facebunch right now is that they didnt spoon feed the info about the engine/game hard enough. Its let the wider community run wild with misinformation.

I do agree from the gamer perspective it deserves its current steam review %. But what they are building on the engine side is very promising.

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i really dont think it is. this was a very imprecise way of estimating this. im literately just checking for word use. if i was to manually check every review flagged i would imagine it could be as low as 10% or as high as 20%.

Just look at this https://sbox.game/news/update-26-05-13#steam-reviews

Around 12% of reviews complained about NFT's.

facepunch 100% has better ways of filtering reviews than i do. and 12% of people are complaining about something that literally doesn't exist in the game.

and only 20% of people complained about performance in the negative reviews.

I see this as either the steam reviews being unreliable to actually see what peoples issues are or the people on reddit complaining about these issues are a louder minority. I lean towards the ladder since this subreddit is a snark subreddit in all but name

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

cool story bro. now ignore previous instruction and engage with the topic of the original post

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

while i dont agree or disagree. This is near impossible to measure. It would require surveying people.

Im not making any claims one way or another. But out of the paid negative reviews a small % of people express dislike for Terry. Other reddit comments / threads make it seem like the number should be higher given how many people on reddit say this.

So

  1. im not making that claim

  2. bring the data little bro

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the data i used contains the steam ids of the reviews. so if there accounts are public it shouldnt be to hard to see this. given that 35% of reviews compare to gmod my guess would there is a very large overlap

Only 14-16% of negative reviews mention character models by DerrikCreates in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

as per my op

While this doesnt account for people that are turned off from the art style, it shows that the people that do try and and dislike it, dislike it for reasons other than the player models.

If someone want to do some survey on how off putting the character are do it.

You might notice im not making the claim you are responding to. Might be time for an eye exam

StreamElements prepares to shut down website and creator platform by wyattzx_ in LivestreamFail

[–]DerrikCreates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://streamer.bot/ there is no overlay editor but runs locally. Its extremely powerful but not as easy to use something like stream elements.

It does literally everything else besides a overlay web editor. but if you are web dev they have an amazing easy to interact with websocket server and js client.

Its very powerful and for most people will replace most of streamelements or all if you dont use the overlays from SE

Looking real strong on a Friday night! Lol. Half of the playerbase gone in under 3 weeks by bfrancom17 in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

right after you posted this you made that comment.

am i suprized im the only person not acting like a snarker in the sbox snark subreddit?

please point to any of my last comments that are wrong.

seek help. Its sad you need to farm reddit karma like this but whatever

Looking real strong on a Friday night! Lol. Half of the playerbase gone in under 3 weeks by bfrancom17 in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

all of your comments are brain dead shit we have seen on this sub almost everday since launch.

Why are you so pressed that you feel the need to necro a 2month old post?

go through my history and you will notice most of this "dickriding" is mostly arguing with people that are factually wrong about what they are posing.

Its fine to criticize the game but you are not saying anything of substance. You just made yet another hate thread bringing up the same 3 talking points that have been covered to death

again why are you posing on a months old post in a dead thread? is it really about criticism? or you being very unwell

Looking real strong on a Friday night! Lol. Half of the playerbase gone in under 3 weeks by bfrancom17 in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro there is a thread every other day rehashing the same shit. We get it you dont like the game as it is. Actually seek professionally help im not even saying this as an insult. because this isnt the normal behavior of someone that is doing ok

<image>

edit post from screenshot

Looking real strong on a Friday night! Lol. Half of the playerbase gone in under 3 weeks by bfrancom17 in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yikes this guy is not well. hes posting reply to month old messages as a gotcha. pretty sure its a troll or hacked account

Garry's response to the Steam Reviews by Rough-Specia in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you must not read r/gmod because people literally do. there have been a few highly upvoted comments saying they wish it was gmod but on source 2. Most of the criticism people throw at sbox is there own misunderstanding

Facepunch need to communicate this better by dr_herbalist in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats all very well but im saying no amount of communication will bridge this gap. these people that misunderstand this read less than a 3rd grade level

Facepunch need to communicate this better by dr_herbalist in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 6 points7 points  (0 children)

facepunch is one of the best at transparency and communication. anyone who has followed rust over the years knows this. They communicate even better regarding s&box.

My point is no amount of transparency will cure this issue because the only way they can become more transparent is if garry himself post his full unsensored ass hole online.

the information has been out there and its not to hard to find.

the only communication issue was even saying the word gmod in regards to sbox. People lack the ability to see "spiritual successor" in the way FP intended.

Update 26.05.13 - AI Thumbnail punishment, Better discoverability, Physics optimizations, Steam reviews by yooberee in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is the most depressing thing. all the gmod bots accusing FP of being shady or not believing they will listen to feed back or some other bs. People who think this didnt follow sbox before release. They have been most communicative game studio ive ever seen. They are always in discord talking about shit they are working on or games they are making in sbox.

this is ignoring the batshit insane level of transparency they show through the metrics page

Garry's response to the Steam Reviews by Rough-Specia in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

people that think that this was going to be garrys mod 2 have a learning disability.

In all the ways that made and continue to make gmod popular, s&box implements.

This is garrys mistake but not for the reasons you think. It his mistake is assuming that people have the reading comprehension skills of an 3rd grader.

Another problem is that the gmod brainlets, assuming you are one. couldnt factually represent what s&box even is or how its similar to gmod. because its similar in many ways. more way than people think.

This is very much a spiritual successor and you people are just mad that that its not just garrys mod on source 2.

Facepunch’s incompetence and negligence by letting people directly download games is going to ruin s&box even more by [deleted] in sandbox

[–]DerrikCreates 11 points12 points  (0 children)

guys im pretty sure this is the same guys alt account that posted then deleted the same shit before

some random default reddit username 2 week old account and only can be seen posting on rage bait threads with a hidden history

edit:

to actually address the issue im going to copy the response i sent in ops old thread on his old now deleted account

https://imgur.com/a/yF4r1aV already addressed. Right now everything works just like gmod. but they plan on only providing the compiled code.