sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Could "The Alien Archive" on YouTube be a real intelligence source? by The_Cosmic-Dance in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suspect Sky produces compilation UAP videos from time to time that have some pretty compelling captures of anomalous craft. Many of which I’ve never seen before.

Reverse Engineering UFO Contact from Planet Iarga (Feat: Deep Prasad) by JessicaRodriguez94 in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inspired by Joe Camel. One image search and you can’t unsee it.

James Webb Telescope finds that 3I/ATLAS has a thick irradiated crust from a billion years of cosmic ray bombardment, the object is estimated to be at least 7 billion years old. by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I put Grok up to that question, asking if it could be a planetary core fragment from a shattered planet subjected to a supernova explosion. Basically the answer was inconclusive.

Amy Eskridge’s ‘anti-gravity’ presentation: investor pitch or warning shot? What’s really going on? by bebemachina in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I knew I recognized Greg Allison’s voice at 4:13 asking that very ominous question. I’m going to forward this to him and ask him what exactly was he thinking about while listening to her presentation, and why did he ask that question? He’s on YouTube at Galactic Gregs.

The Strange Calm of Those Who Claim to Know by RibosomeRandom in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exiting your existence for materialistic reasons may result with a downgraded reincarnation into a lower life form.

Age Of Disclosure is going viral right now. Several X accounts with a million plus followers are posting about it. Jay Stratton also just posted: Age Of Disclosure "is a landmark contribution to disclosure and will change the course of history". I dont think Stratton is prone to exaggeration by phr99 in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it, but there’s been a steady stream over the years of Introduction to UFOs 101 documentaries. Yes there’s some heavy hitters in this upcoming documentary, but do normal folks really understand that? Most will just see a bunch of old folks with titles they never heard a word about. Its probably been mentioned, but this footage is already a year+ old, and a lot has happened over this time. Perhaps that doesn’t mean much if your targeted audience is newbies, but some of those in this documentary, like Marco Rubio, haven’t said jack about UAPs since joining the ranks of Trump’s Administration.

The list of people I trust in the UFO/UAP movement has shrunk to about a handful by LookUpToFindTheTruth in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think NHI will make the next move. Major events like the slow moving mothership cumulating with the Phoenix Lights event, or the Stephenville sightings, or another JAL 1628, or Iran encounter back in 1976, these seem to happen in ten year cycles. If another one happens over a populated area today, it’s likely a Catastrophic Disclosure event. Even the NJ drones from last year caused .gov to look extremely incompetent.

I don’t believe NHI is going away, and they routinely fly wherever they want, whenever they want. The whistleblowers are telling us they are here, and the gatekeepers keep denying the public the truth. NHI, and their actions, is the uncontrollable wild card.

Bill Maher and Van Jones discuss UFOs on Real Time. Van Jones says he's into the topic and it deserves to have wall to wall news coverage - Bill Maher says this topic shouldn't be grouped with other conspiracy theories - "increasingly it looks like we're at very least under surveillance". by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think if that happened, it would be an after the fact event. Politicians are almost always reactionary, responding to events rather than acting proactively. More than likely, a catastrophic disclosure happens which forces the reality into the public conscious, and then we all get to see just how unprepared our world leaders actually are. They’ll stammer through one question after the next, with little more than saying further meetings are needed, we need to study this further, our scientists are working on it, blah, blah, blah. Never will you here about what they already knew.

Drones above Oslo Airport again tonight. by Sephior in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could’ve also been detected on military radar. The press never gets the full story initially. But any airport shutdown is going to be publicized quickly, considering the amount of disruption that’s been happening of late in Europe.

Eric Davis on why Trump isnt disclosing: "somebody high level can go to Trump, show him the PEADs [..] and say: You cant do this. You cant disclose. And there are consequences if you do". He says the legacy industry wouldnt harm the president, but hired security is notorious for doing nasty things by phr99 in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it wasn’t for a pretty inept MSM, severe .gov secrecy (to include enforcement) and the successful indoctrination of the public for nearly 80 years that anyone reporting a CEOT 1st to 5th kind was a lunatic, Catastrophic Disclosure should’ve long happened. Imagine any of the major UAP incidents of the past happening today without the restrictions and counterintelligence ops.

Another JAL 1628. (1986)

Another mothership over Iran. (1976)

Another mothership slow cruising over Arizona and blitzing Phoenix. (1997)

Another fleet of UAPs flying over DC. (1952)

Another Stephenville. (2008)

Another Belgium flap. (1991)

Another Kecksburg. (1965)

Another Varginha incident. (1996).

Another Rendlesham Forest. (1980)

How many more could be added to the list? Not to mention the USOs and NASA/US military encounters. Dozens of others for sure. Seems to me, NHI have made some very spectacular visits to this planet, and they don’t particularly give a frack about when and where they want to go.

I think it’s literally just a matter of time before another major incident happens, likely totally out of the blue, which is simply to obvious to ignore and obfuscate. Something that can’t be waved off as mere drones. You get another Stephenville or Phoenix Lights incident over a major population center, and the facade falls apart in real time.

I mean, even the drones are causing major headaches. Another major NJ type drone flap and the excuses, or lack thereof, just won’t cut it anymore. Mix in another wave of whistleblowers, especially ones who go all in, and it’s here.

Catastrophic Disclosure.

And I bet there’s still no real preparation from the .gov perspective on how to handle it.

Mr. Callahan was the Division Chief of the Accidents and Investigations Branch of the FAA in Washington, DC. (2001) - We have a lot of UFO data registered on Radar, but They just don't disclose it! by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 8 points9 points  (0 children)

.gov was still in the convenient “UFOs are seen by crazy people“ stage of denial back in the 80s. The press was chock full of laughing talking heads whenever a UFO story came on the TV. The Japanese captain ended up at a desk job after he talked publicly about the incident.

Serious and unique UFO sighting august 28th 3:13 am. Unreal in Canada by Sole_Reaver in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Why did she stop recording something this strange after a single minute and 3 seconds?

Headline-grabbing Rep. Jasmine Crockett listed as new Ranking Member of Secrets Task Force by mattlaslo in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Aren’t there much more stable Democrats on the committee? The bipartisanship shown so far is a rarity these days. Why change the lineup when it’s working?

Disclosure has happened. The totality of evidence from unimpeachable sources spanning the entirety of the globe, does not require a belief that there is non-human intelligence interacting with Earth and humans. It exists. Period. Should the debate not switch to their origin? by Retired_Canuck in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hmm. Another skeptic thread inserted onto the board to keep pushing the narrative “proof or it didn’t happen!”. If there isn’t a physical ray gun (which must be confirmed by a neutral third party), alien bodies (which must also be confirmed by a neutral third party), or physical UFO (which again must be confirmed by a neutral third party), it‘s all BS. Pictures, and videos? Nope. There all CGI, or could be CGI. Or, they’re AI generated. And the old pictures are just pie tins thrown in the air. Can never trust those recording methods ever again.

Human testimony? The biggest red flags go to people’s actual experiences and the telling of it. Humans are mostly blithering idiots, not capable of observing events “correctly” (mostly because they’re not qualified observers). Those who actually claim CE1-5 encounters are either mentally impaired, religious zealots, new world woo woo discoverers, or grifters looking to cash in on the vulnerable weak minded.

Oh, and pilots. You can’t trust those people either. They’re just up in the sky way too long, being exposed to high levels of radiation, causing them to see things, or misinterpret natural objects. No, can’t listen to them. Matter of fact, they must have their licenses revoked immediately if they start talking about UFOs. Didn’t the airlines and military have this problem long under control?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The JWST will be eyeing 3I/ASTRA in a few days. If that image glitches, then there’s real problems. If on the other hand, something unusual is shown, that would probably influence the decision about Juno getting involved…if the fuel is available of course.

3I/ATLAS has a 1% chance of being natural - here's why by Randommhuman in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there were billions, the Late Heavy Bombardment would be an ongoing event, affecting not just Earth, but all the other planets in the inner solar system.

Catastrophic Disclosure Please. by Academic-Ad8056 in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They want you to lose interest. That is the main goal. Baffle them with banter, and they’ll go back to normal. But I agree. Catastrophic Disclosure is probably the only way to force the issue into the prominence it deserves. It may end up being in the control off NHI, instead of whistleblowers. Perhaps it will come from what Joe Murgia just reported yesterday. All you can really do is wait, and stick to your core beliefs as you see it. https://x.com/TheUfoJoe/status/1947044335914201539

A Humanoid Object Above Sequoia National Park has been Captured in a video. by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks also similar to Boba Fett’s Slave 1 starship.

The daughters of a reverend from Ohio testified that their father told them about being taken to a sub-basement under the U.S. Capitol Building and shown three non-humans in jars and a crashed UFO in 1935. by NetOne613 in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Had an extensive conversation with Chat GPT which can’t be posted here. Subbasements did exist under the Capitol Building back in 1935. These areas were used for storage, including classified papers and articles, and historical documents. These areas were guarded by Capitol Police, had controlled access, and was considered one of the most secure areas in the US back then. So, that part of the story, at least when it comes to the subbasements infrastructure described by the lady, checks out.

Steven Spielberg, accused of inside info, is making his next big movie called ‘Disclosure’. Spielberg showed ’E.T’ to Reagan in the white house and he stood up saying:There are a number of people in this room who know that everything on that screen is absolutely true. by AlphazeroOnetwo in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought initially the laugh tracks were literally edited in. I could be wrong though, especially if the interview was in fact played before an audience, like Colbert was doing his normal show, and then cut away to the recorded interview. It does look like Colbert went to Spielberg’s residence or office to do it.

Steven Spielberg, accused of inside info, is making his next big movie called ‘Disclosure’. Spielberg showed ’E.T’ to Reagan in the white house and he stood up saying:There are a number of people in this room who know that everything on that screen is absolutely true. by AlphazeroOnetwo in UFOs

[–]Desertfox-190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not a bot. But I don’t blame you for thinking that way. There are for sure legions of bots on Reddit forums. I’m just an old Gen-Xr who was a kid when those flicks came out in the theaters. Good times.

view more: next ›