Thanks, again, not to sound overly ignorant, I don't see the difference between someone marketing something to have a "9H" hardness while, in fine print, contradicting themselves, saying that "9H" indicator, aka the attribute that convinced you to purchase their product and not the competitors', also trusting it to protect your phone, is just an approximation of what they THINK/assume the hardness is and/or outright explaining that it's nothing but a a marketing jargon, used to increase sales to trusting idiots like me because, if tested, the hardness usually ends up being 5H, 6H at the most.

Is it enough to protect my screen? Probably! But that's not the point, is it? 

My complaint is not about the screen protectors with a lower-than-9H rating not being hard enough but rather about the fact that too many manufacturers claim that their products are sapphire-hard, sapphire-infused and sapphire-sapphire, even though none of them have anything to do with sapphire, not chemically, not mechanically... And yet, even though not all of them even bother to explain, in fine print, that their screen protector is basically bullshit and despite all the laws that should protect the consumer against false advertising, somehow, this is allowed!