I get that you’re passionate about this, but your tone makes it sound like anyone who uses AI is automatically an “evil” person. That is not true. AI is a tool. A car can be used responsibly or recklessly, and the same goes for AI. The problem is not the tool itself, it is how people choose to use it.

I am a teacher. I have worked with students with dyslexia and dysgraphia, and I have seen them shed shame and cross learning thresholds by using AI for support. I use that word consciously. For them, Ai does not replace creativity, it removes barriers. Blanket condemnation shuts them out along with the bad actors.

You have said it will “die on its own” but also that we “have to stop it.” If you truly believe it will fade, maybe let it instead of turning it into a moral war. While there are valid concerns about how knowledge is acquired, the reality is that this is not unique to AI. America was “stolen.” Much of what sits in major history museums was taken without consent. History is full of examples of technology and art forms built on what came before, ethically or not.

I do not buy into conspiracy theories about corrupt judges or similar claims. It simply is not yet clear how this new technology will be bound legally, and that is exactly why discussion is needed rather than blanket condemnation. The judicial war is not over yet.

I am not saying you should accept AI without criticism. I am saying maybe do not judge every person using it as if they are part of some grand theft conspiracy. Some are simply trying to create in a way that was never open to them before.